Abstract
Using Holland et al.’s (Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998) theory of identity and their concept of figured worlds, this article provides an overview of how twenty-five undergraduates of color came to produce a Multiracial identity. Using Critical Race Theory methodology with ethnographic interviewing as the primary method, I specifically focus on the ways in which Multiracial figured worlds operate within a racial borderland (Anzaldúa in Borderlands: La Frontera—The New Mestiza, Aunt Lute Books, San Francisco, 1987), an alternate, marginal world where improvisational play (Holland et al. in Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998) and facultad became critical elements of survival. Participants exercised their agency by perforating monoracial storylines and developed a complex process of identity production that informed their behaviors by a multifaceted negotiation of positionalities. I end by focusing on implications for urban education that can be drawn from this study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
LGBTQ stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer/Questioning community(ies).
References
Antonio, A. L. (2001). The role of interracial interaction in the development of leadership skills and cultural knowledge and understanding. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 593–617.
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands: La Frontera—The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
Apple, M. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bishop, R. (2005). Freeing ourselves from neocolonial domination in research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without racists. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The genesis of the concepts of ‘Habitus’ and ‘Field’. Sociocriticism, 2(2), 11–24.
Chang, M., Denson, N., Sáenz, V., & Misa, K. (2006). The educational benefits of sustaining cross-racial interaction among undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 430–455.
Chang, M. J., Witt, D., Jones, J., & Hakuta, K. (2003). Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in colleges and universities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Chang-Ross, A. (2010). Reflections of a racial queer. Journal of Multicultural Perspectives., 12(2), 107–112.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.
Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 1–26.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–366.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr, Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hurtado, S., Dey, E. L., Gurin, P., & Gurin, G. (2003). College environments, diversity, and student learning. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 18, pp. 145–190). Dorddrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ifekwunigwe, J. O. (2004). Mixed race studies: A reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1986). Racial Formation in the United States from the 1960's to the 1980's. New York, NY: Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(23), 23–44.
Spivak, G. (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. London: Routledge.
Torres, E. (2003). Chicana without apology: The new Chicana cultural studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Urrieta, L. (2007). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o activist educators. Urban Review, 39(2), 117–144.
Weber, M. (Ed.). (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, A. Identity Production in Figured Worlds: How Some Multiracial Students Become Racial Atravesados/as. Urban Rev 46, 25–46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-013-0247-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-013-0247-4