Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing Disability in Socially Responsible Companies

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incorporation of People with Disability (PWD) in organizations is a subject taken up by international organizations, such as the European Union and the United Nations, which has had subsequent consequences in Spain with the development of legislation and specific initiatives. In this paper we have considered the concept of disability as part of diversity and, above all, as a fundamental subject of human rights and justice, which has allowed us to include the collective of PWD among the stakeholders of companies. The research on the incorporation of disability as an integral part of the policies of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in companies is very recent, although the term Corporate Social Responsibility and Disability is already used. The main objective of this paper is to analyze the commitment with PWD of Spanish companies considered socially responsible by the sustainability indices used. We have included in four large dimensions (Stakeholders, Visibility, Human Resources and Accessibility) the indicators that have allowed us to analyze the information on PWD published by these companies in their sustainability reports or similar documents accessible through their websites. The results suggest that the companies are more concerned about improving their image towards the exterior than for the commitment with their own employees, which is consistent with the dimension Visibility being where the companies carry out more actions in favor of PWD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For further information, you can check: http://www.ncil.org/about/aboutil/.

  2. www.forovidaindependiente.org.

  3. www.enil.eu.

  4. https://csr-d.eu/en.

  5. www.fundaciononce.es.

  6. www.globalreporting.org.

  7. www.globalreporting.org/reporting/g4.

  8. The SWC originated in Spain in the year 1985 as an employment formula for the PWD, with its main objective being to promote the labor and social integration of this collective. In accordance with RD 364/2005, one of the alternative measures that Spanish companies can adopt in order to fulfil the current regulations and cover the personnel quota of PWD are the actions carried out with these centers.

  9. In 1989, Peter Kinder, Steve Lydenberg and Amy Domini founded KLD. They offer institutional investors easy-to-use, comprehensive and accurate social research on US KLD maintains the Domini 400 Social Index (DSI), a common stock index consisting of 400 corporations that have passed multiple, broad-based social screens. For further information, you can check: http://web.net/~robrien/papers/sri/players/kld.html.

  10. In 1999, The Dow Jones Sustainability World Index was launched as the first global sustainability benchmark and is offered cooperatively by RobecoSAM Indices and S&P Dow Jones Indices. The indices provide an effective engagement platform for companies who want to adopt sustainable best practices. For further information, you can check: http://www.sustainability-indices.com/.

  11. The FTSE4Good Index Series is designed to measure the performance of companies demonstrating strong Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices. Transparent management and clearly-defined ESG criteria make FTSE4Good indices suitable tools to be used by a wide variety of market participants when creating or assessing responsible investment products. For further information, you can check: http://www.ftse.com/products/indices/FTSE4Good.

  12. www.sustainability-indices.com/sustainability-assessment/corporate-sustainability.jsp.

  13. Data of the FTSE4Good and of the DJSI Europe referring to September 2014.

  14. The Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) brings together individuals and organizations from around the world to develop strategies, guidelines, and resources to help make the Web accessible to PWD. One of the functions of WAI is to develop guidelines and techniques that provide accessible solutions for the Web software and for the Web developers. The WAI guidelines are considered as international standards of Web accessibility. For further information, you can check: http://www.w3.org/WAI/about.html.

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic, A. (2003). Systems approach to corporate sustainability: A general management framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81(5), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 639–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcellos de Paula, L. (2010). Modelos de gestión aplicados a la sostenibilidad empresarial. Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España. Retrieved November 25, 2014 from http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/35386/2/LBP_TESIS.pdf.

  • Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón, M. J., & Calderón, B. (2012). Los Centros Especiales de Empleo como mecanismo de tránsito hacia el mercado de trabajo ordinario. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 75, 223–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campoy Cervera, I., & Palacios, A. (2007). Igualdad, no discriminación y discapacidad: una visión integradora de las realidades española y argentina. Madrid: Dykinson. Retrieved February 26, 2015 from http://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=lINECe-8p6wC&oi=fnd&pg=PA9&dq=campoy+cervera&ots=Jgf67gHWEH&sig=hfPC0UaMawpNqT4w-fFz2qzXbE8#v=onepage&q=campoy%20cervera&f=false.

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility—Evolution of a definitional construction. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlo Molina, M. J., & Moya Clemente, I. (2010). El comportamiento financiero de las empresas socialmente responsables. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16(2), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivite Cebolla, M. P., Enciso de Yzaguirre, V., García Osma, B., & Túa Pereda, J. (2014). Determinantes de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa: la crisis y el Efecto Contagio. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 81, 127–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivite, M. P., & Gallardo, S. (2014). La bioética en la empresa: el caso particular de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. RIO: Revista Internacional de Organizaciones, 13, 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consolandi, C., Jaiswal-Dale, A., Poggiani, E., & Vercelli, A. (2009). Global standards and ethical stock indexes: The case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Ministers of Spain. (2014). Plan de acción de la estrategia española sobre discapacidad 2014–2020. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://www.msssi.gob.es/ssi/discapacidad/docs/plan_accion_EED.pdf.

  • Council of the EU. (2001). Decision of the Council of the European Union on the European Year of PWD. Retrieved April 27, 2015 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=URISERV:c11413.

  • Cronje, F., & Van Wyk, J. (2013). Measuring corporate personality with social responsibility bench marks. Journal of Global Responsibility, 4(2), 188–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSR+D. (2011). CSR and disability indicators. Retrieved May 6, 2015 from https://www.csr-d.eu/wp-content/uploads/CSR__Disability_Indicators_EN1.pdf.

  • De la Cuesta González, M. (2004). El porqué de la responsabilidad social corporativa. Boletín Económico de ICE, Información Comercial Española, 2813, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Cuesta González, M., & Valor Martínez, V. (2003). Responsabilidad social de la empresa. Concepto, medición y desarrollo en España. Boletín Económico de ICE, Información Comercial Española, 2755, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roeck, K., & Delobbe, N. (2012). Do environmental CSR initiatives serve organizations’ legitimacy in the oil industry? Exploring employees’ reactions through organizational identification theory. Journal of Business Theory, 110, 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, D., Berens, G., & Li, T. (2013). The impact of interactive corporate social responsibility communication on corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-Izquierdo, M. A. (2010). Socially responsable investing: Sustainability índices, ESG rating and information provider agencies. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 2(4), 442–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). European strategy 2020. Retrieved April 23, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. 23/04/2015.

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibility. Retrieved April 23, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/index_en.htm.

  • Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small-business owner-managers’ perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 425–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasterling, B., & Demuijnck, G. (2013). Human rights in the void? Due diligence in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, M. A., Muñoz, M. J., & Balaguer, M. R. (2005). La Responsabilidad Social Corporativa: Relaciones entre la performance social, financiera y bursátil de la empresa (p. 23). Castellón, Documento de Trabajo: Universitat Jaume I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontrodona, J., & Argandoña, A. (2011). Una visión panorámica de la ética empresarial. Universia Business Review, 30, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13. Retrieved May 5, 2015 from http://www.umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf.

  • García Alonso, J. V. (2003). Introducción. In J. V. García Alonso (Ed.), El movimiento de vida independiente: Experiencias internacionales (pp 29–53). Madrid: Fundación Luis Vives.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, E. J., Sánchez, I., & de Miguel, N. (2010). Selección de indicadores y control del grado de sostenibilidad de una industria de procesos. Técnica Industrial, 285, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-de-Madariaga, J., & Rodríguez-de-Rivera-Cremades, F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and the classical theory of the firm: Are both theories irreconcilable? Innovar, 20(37), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomiz, P. (2004). La dimensión social y la creación de valor en la empresa de hoy. Bolsa de Madrid, 131, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI & ONCE. (2015). Disability in sustainability reporting. Retrieved April 30, 2015 from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-y-Fundacion-ONCE-La-Discapacidad-en-las-Memorias-de-Sostenibilidad.pdf.

  • Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawn, O., Chatterji, A., & Mitchell, W. (2014). How firm performance moderates the effect of changes in status on investor perceptions: Additions and deletions by the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Boston U. School of Management Research Paper, 2418300. Retrieved January 12, 2015 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2418300.

  • INE. (2008). Encuesta de Discapacidad Autonomía personal y situaciones de Dependencia. Retrieved April 22, 2015 from http://www.ine.es/revistas/cifraine/1009.pdf.

  • INE. (2013). Encuesta de población Activa. Retrieved April 22, 2015 from http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736055502&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735976595.

  • Ioannou, I. (2010). Profiting from corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy Review, 4, 39–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, J. J., Topiol, S., & Berkeley, S. (2003). Using indicators to measure sustainibility performance at a corporate and project level. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel, I. (2001). Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index: A global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, A., & Schalock, R. L. (1991). Supported employment: Equal opportunities for severely disabled men and women. International Labour Review, 130(1), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2003). Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 5, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2005). A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9, 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law 13/1982. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1982-9983.

  • Law 41/2003. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2003-21053.

  • Law 51/2003. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2003-22066.

  • Law 53/2003. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2003-22717.

  • Law 49/2007. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2007-22293.

  • Law 2/2011. Retieved from http://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2011-4117.

  • Law 26/2011. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2011-13241.

  • Legislative RD 1/2013. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2013-12632.

  • Long, J. A., Nelson, T. A., & Wulder, M. A. (2010). Local indicators for categorical data: Impacts of scaling decisions. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 54(1), 15–28. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00300.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, M. V., García, A., & Rodríguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, M. V., Pérez, M. C., & Rodríguez, L. (2012). Incidencia de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y de la innovación en los resultados de las empresas. AECA: Revista de la Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas, 97, 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Pino, C. M., & Seco Martín, E. (2005). Discapacidad y empleo en España: su visibilidad. Innovar, 15(26), 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D., & Sánchez-Runde, C. (2013). Cultural diversity and universal ethics in a global world. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 681–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteleone, R., & Mozzana, C. (2009). Integrated employment policies for disabled people. Organisational innovation between obstacles and opportunities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(11/12), 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Martín, J. (2013). Business ethics, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and creating shared value (CSV). Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability, 7(3), 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro Espigares, J. L., & González López, J. M. (2006). Responsabilidad social corporativa y crecimiento económico. Estudios de economía aplicada, 24(2), 723–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J. L., & Hernández, E. (2005). Outsourcing and Corporate Social Responsibility in Public Services. In XXV annual conference of european association for research on services (RESER). Retrieved January 20, 2015 from http://www.reser.net.

  • Núñez, P. T. (1989). La evolución en la protección de la vulnerabilidad por el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Revista Española de Relaciones Internacionales, 4, 125–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez, G. (2003). La responsabilidad social corporativa en un marco de desarrollo sostenible. Serie Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa Berganza, J. (2013). Finanzas para una economía humana sostenible: hacia la banca ética. Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas, 20, 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal EU. (2010). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. Retrieved April 23, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm.

  • Official Journal EU. (2011). European disability strategy. Retrieved April 23, 2015 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011IP0453&qid=1435054036812&from=EN.

  • Official Journal EU. (2012). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU. Retrieved April 23, 2015 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT.

  • ONCE Foundation. (2009). Guía de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial y Discapacidad. Retrieved April 30, 2015 from http://rsed.fundaciononce.es/.

  • Organic Law 4/2011. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2011-4551.

  • Pajuelo Moreno, M. L. (2014). Un análisis de la investigación en España sobre los aspectos éticos, sociales y medioambientales: una visión de la situación actual y perspectivas. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20, 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios Rizzo, A. (2004). La discapacidad frente al poder de la normalidad. Una aproximación desde tres modelos teóricos. Tesina doctoral, Instituto de Derechos Humanos Bartolomé de las Casas, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid.

  • Patel, T., & Schaefer, A. (2009). Making sense of the diversity of ethical decision making in business: An illustration of the indian context. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RD 1414/2006. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2006-22080.

  • RD 1856/2009. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2009-20891.

  • RD 1971/1999. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2000-1546.

  • RD 290/2004. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2004-3277.

  • RD 364/2005. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2005-6308.

  • RD 505/2007. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/05/11/pdfs/A20384-20390.pdf.

  • RD 173/2010. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2010-4056.

  • Robinson, M., Kleffner, A., & Bertels, S. (2011). Signaling sustainability leadership: Empirical evidence of the value of DJSI membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Calero, J. (2013). La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial y la Buena Administración. Revista Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad, 7(3), 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz Santolaria, C. J., & Alda García, M. (2009). Análisis de las web de las empresas del índice FTSE4Good IBEX. Partida Doble, 214, 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, S., Malzer, V., & Bruyère, S. (2014). Perspectives on disability disclosure: The importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26, 237–255. doi:10.1007/s10672-013-9227-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. W. (2011). You support diversity, but are you ethical? Examining the interactive effects of diversity and ethical climate perceptions on turnover intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strandberg, L. (2010). La medición y la comunicación de la RSE: indicadores y normas. Cuadernos de la Cátedra La Caixa de RSE y Gobierno corporativo 9. Barcelona: IESE.

  • Su, H.-Y. (2014). Business ethics and the development of intellectual capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis, J., Seaton, B., & Shepherd, P. L. (2014). Business Ethics Index: Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1994). Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. Retrieved December 12, 2014 from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A%2FRES%2F48%2F96&Submit=Search&Lang=E.

  • UN. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved December 12, 2014 from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.

  • Velasco Gámez, M. M., Puentes Poyatos, R., & Vilar Hernández, J. (2010). El código unificado de buen gobierno: su nivel de seguimiento por empresas socialmente responsables. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Época, 2, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victoria Maldonado, J. A. (2013). Hacia un modelo de atención a la discapacidad basado en los Derechos Humanos. Boletín mexicano de Derecho Comparado, 138, 1093–1109. Retrieved November 16, 2014 from http://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx/revista/pdf/DerechoComparado/138/art/art8.pdf.

  • Villanueva Flores, M., & Valle Cabrera, R. (2011). La discriminación de los empleados con discapacidad en las organizaciones: el rol de la asignación del puesto de trabajo. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20(3), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, A. (2014). Guías para la responsabilidad social en las Pymes: efectividad de herramientas de autoevaluación. Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad, 8(2), 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. A. (2013). Feeling Good by doing good: Employee CSR-induced attributions, job satisfaction, and the role of charismatic leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 577–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Mavin, S. (2012). Disability as constructed difference: A literature review and rsesearch agenda for management and organization studies. International Journal of Management, 14, 159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2011). World Report on Disability. Retrieved November 25, 2014 from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/.

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Pº/ Senda del Rey, nº 11, 28040, Madrid, Spain

      Ana Isabel Segovia-San-Juan

    2. Department of Business Organization, Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Pº/ Senda del Rey, nº 11, 28040, Madrid, Spain

      Irene Saavedra & Victoria Fernández-de-Tejada

    Authors
    1. Ana Isabel Segovia-San-Juan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Irene Saavedra
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Victoria Fernández-de-Tejada
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Irene Saavedra.

    Additional information

    The authors contributed equaly to this work.

    Appendices

    Appendix 1

    See Table 7.

    Table 7 Glossary of Terms
    Full size table

    Appendix 2

    See Table 8.

    Table 8 Sources of Information of Analyzed Companies
    Full size table

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Segovia-San-Juan, A.I., Saavedra, I. & Fernández-de-Tejada, V. Analyzing Disability in Socially Responsible Companies. Soc Indic Res 130, 617–645 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1198-9

    Download citation

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1198-9

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation