Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Writing difficulties in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study addresses the scope of the writing difficulties observed in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Patients with AD, patients with MCI and healthy controls performed a written picture-naming task and a direct copy transcoding task in which phonology-to-orthography (P–O) consistency was manipulated. Written latencies, inter-letter durations, mean word pen pressure and number of errors were measured. Results revealed that there was a significant difference between the control group and both groups of patients in written latencies and number of errors. However, in inter-letter interval or mean pen pressure there were significant differences only between the group with AD and the other groups. P–O consistency and the type of task produced similar effects in the three groups of participants, suggesting a general deficit affecting the ability to access/generate orthographic representations. The relevance of these results for understanding the spelling impairment in AD and MCI are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afonso, O., & Álvarez, C. J. (2011). Phonological effects in handwriting production: Evidence from the implicit priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1474–1483. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, O., Álvarez, C. J., & Kandel, S. (2015a). Effects of grapheme-to-phoneme probability on writing durations. Memory & Cognition, 43, 579–592. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0489-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, O., Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2015b). Spelling impairments in Spanish dyslexic adults. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, O., Suárez-Coalla, P., González-Martín, N., & Cuetos, F. (2017). The impact of word frequency on peripheral processes during handwriting: A matter of age. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1275713.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349

  • Beauvois, M. F., & Derouesné, J. (1981). Lexical or orthographic agraphia. Brain, 104, 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, P., Méot, A., Lagarrigue, A., & Roux, S. (2015). Written object naming, spelling-to-dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1268–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, P., Roux, S., Barry, C., & Canell, L. (2012). Evidence for a limited-cascading account of written word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1741–1758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bub, D., & Kertesz, A. (1982). Deep agraphia. Brain and Language, 17, 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A. (1988). Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: The lexical system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 11, 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertkow, H., & Bub, D. (1990). Semantic memory loss in dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Brain, 113, 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese, M. J., Balota, D. A., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., & Buckner, R. L. (2003). Spelling via semantics and phonology: Exploring the effects of age, Alzheimer’s disease, and primary semantic impairment. Neuropsychologia, 41, 942–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croisile, B., Brabant, M., Carmol, T., Lepage, Y., Aimard, G., & Trillet, M. (1996). Comparison between oral and written spelling in Alzheimer disease. Brain and Language, 54, 361–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuetos, F. (1991). Psicología de la Escritura: Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de los Trastornos de Escritura. Madrid: Escuela Española, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuetos, F., Martínez, T., Martínez, C., Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2003). Lexical processing in Spanish patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuetos, F., Samartino, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2012). Age acquisition norms from elderly Spanish people: Characteristics and the prediction of word recognition performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Psicológica, 33, 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. L., Benson, F., Hill, M. A., & Read, S. (1985). Aphasia in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology, 35, 394–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delattre, M., Bonin, P., & Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1330–1340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K. E., Shanks, M. F., & Venneri, A. (2004). The evolution of dysgraphia in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Research Bulletin, 63, 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. L., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (1997). Progressive dysgraphia: Co-occurrence of central and peripheral impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 975–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. L., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). The impact of semantic memory impairment on spelling: Evidence from semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 8, 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinet, E., & Kandel, S. (2010). Ductus: A software package for the study of handwriting production. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 326–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (1995). Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neurospsychologia, 33, 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 115–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. C., Graham, N., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. (1997). Dysgraphia in mild dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Neuropsychologia, 35, 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, S., & Perret, C. (2015). How does the interaction between spelling and motor processes build up during writing acquisition? Cognition, 136, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBarge, E., Smith, D. S., Dick, L., & Storandt, M. (1992). Agraphia in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 49, 1151–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E., Alamargot, D., Larocque, D., & Caporossi, G. (2011). Dynamics of the spelling process during a copy task: Effects of regularity and frequency. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., Graham, N., Dawson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2003). Homogeneity and heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of 55 cases. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 126, 2350–2362. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatti, C., Laiacona, M., & Agazzi, D. (2003). Multiple patterns of writing disorders in dementia of the Alzheimer type and their evolution. Neuropsychologia, 41, 759–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the NINCDS–ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 34, 939–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, G., Benvegnù, B., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The independence of phonological and orthographic forms: Evidence from aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 35–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebes, R. D., Brady, C. B., & Huff, F. J. (1989). Automatic and attentional mechanisms of semantic priming in Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onofri, E., Mercuri, M., Donato, G., & Ricci, S. (2015). Cognitive fluctuations in connection to dysgraphia: A comparison of Alzheimer’s disease with dementia Lewy bodies. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 625–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (1985). Surface dyslexia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. C., Doody, R., Kurz, A., Mohs, R. C., Morris, J. C., Rabins, P. V., et al. (2001). Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology, 58, 1985–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 797–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J. J., Turkeltaub, P. E., Eden, G. F., & Rapp, B. (2011). Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapcsak, S. Z., Arthur, S. A., Bliklen, D. A., & Rubens, A. B. (1989). Lexical agraphia in Alzheimer’s disease. Archives of Neurology, 46, 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Martínez, C., Pérez-Carbajal, A. J., & Cuetos, F. (2014). Neural correlates of spelling difficulties in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropshycologia, 65, 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, J. S., McKeeff, T. J., Grosjacques, G., Afonso, O., & Kandel, S. (2013). The interaction between central and peripheral processes in handwriting production. Cognition, 127, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Informatizado del Español. Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universitat de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1981). Phonological agraphia and the lexical route in writing. Brain, 104, 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveri, M. C., Corda, F., & Di Nardo, M. (2007). Central and peripheral aspects of writing disorders in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The Handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 263–289). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2003). Is a single graphemic buffer used in reading and spelling? Aphasiology, 17, 537–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10(2–3), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, P., Rosenblum, S., Bar-On, G., Heinik, J., & Korczyn, A. (2006). Handwriting process variables discriminating mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. The Journals of Gerontology, 61, 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., & Feng, C. (2017). The interaction between central and peripheral processing in Chinese handwritten production: Evidence from the effect of lexicality and radical complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Grant PSI2015-64174P and Grant PSI2013-47959-P from the Spanish Government. Olivia Afonso was the recipient of a research Grant AP2007-00065 from the “Canarian Foundation Doctor Manuel Morales”. The authors would like to thank Margaret Gillon Dowens for her helpful comments on earlier drafts. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Olivia Afonso, Department of Psychology, Health and Professional Development, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, OX3 0BP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivia Afonso.

Appendix

Appendix

Experimental stimuli used in the written picture-naming task and in the direct copy transcoding task.

Words

WF

NL

NS

BF

N

AoA

NA (%)

Consistent

Ce_pillo

5.18

7

3

201

1

3.93

89

Galli_na

13.04

7

3

517

0

3.43

95

Le_ón

30

4

2

172

2

5.13

100

Man_zana

11.07

7

3

39

1

3.03

98

Mari_posa

6.25

8

4

26

0

3.43

100

Rue_da

22.86

5

2

39

3

3.93

92

Te_nedor

3.75

7

3

130

1

2.9

100

To_mate

6.79

6

3

140

0

4.13

98

Inconsistent

Ár_bol

35

5

2

35

0

3.2

97

Ca_ballo

63.21

7

3

270

2

3.2

100

Cala_baza

2.5

8

4

24

0

4.27

87

Ce_bolla

9.46

7

3

74

0

3.17

95

Cor_bata

17.14

7

3

72

1

4.67

100

Esco_ba

2.86

6

3

258

0

3.13

97

Glo_bo

10.18

5

2

20

0

3.04

100

Ti_jeras

4.82

7

3

24

0

3.4

94

  1. The underscore symbol (_) marks the position of the critical inter-letter interval
  2. WF word frequency, NL number of letters, NS number of syllables, BF frequency of the critical bigram, N orthographic neighbourhood, AoA age of acquisition, NA name agreement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afonso, O., Álvarez, C.J., Martínez, C. et al. Writing difficulties in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Read Writ 32, 217–233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9813-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9813-6

Keywords

Navigation