Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Islam’s democracy paradox: Muslims claim to like democracy, so why do they have so little?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this brush-clearing paper, we demonstrate that there is a deficit both of democracy and of freedom in Muslim-majority countries by comparison with the rest of the world. We further demonstrate that these deficits are not fully explained by poverty or by oil but seem to have something to do with Islam itself. We further demonstrate that the democracy and freedom deficits are larger in the Islamic heartland than elsewhere in Muslim-majority countries. We show that the democracy deficit is not driven by demands for autocracy in Muslim-majority countries, and indeed, that individual Muslims value democracy more than non-Muslims. We suggest that the lack of religious freedom in Muslim-majority countries (the supreme power concept) may be a significant variable in explaining the democracy deficit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. (2002). Islam: a short history. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), S158–S183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. (2006). International political system: supreme values and terrorism. Public Choice, 128(1–2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M. (2003). Briefing: Islam, democracy, and public opinion in Africa. African Affairs (2003), 102, 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, N. (2003). After Jihad: America and the struggle for freedom and democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. (2007). Economic and security consequences of supreme values. Public Choice, 131(3–4), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York.

  • Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L. R. Berman, E. (2006). Religious extremism: The good, the bad, and the deadly. Public Choice, 128(1–2), 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2001). The true clash of civilizations. Foreign Policy, 135, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A., & Tessler, M. (2008). The Democracy barometers: attitudes in the Arab world. The Journal of Democracy, 19, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatnycky, A. (2002). Muslim countries and the democracy gap. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: the social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melia, T. O. (2003). What Muslims want: in Afghanistan and elsewhere—Democracy. HeinOnline-4 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 155.

  • Midlarsky, M. I. (1998). Democracy and Islam: implications for civilizational conflict and the democratic peace. International Studies Quarterly, 42, 485–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munger, M. (2006). Preference modification vs. incentive manipulation as tools of terrorist recruitment: The role of culture. Public Choice, 128(1–2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (2002). Democracy and economic development. In E. D. Mansfield & R. Sisson (Eds.), Political science and the public interest (pp. 1–27). Columbus: Columbus Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. L. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53, 325–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (2002). How Muslims view democracy. Journal of Democracy, 13(4).

  • Rowley, C. K. (2000). Political culture economic performance in sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. K. (2004). Conservatism and economics: A sweet Turkish delight. Public Choice, 119(1–2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. K., & Dobra, M. (2003). The glorious revolution of 1688: successful constitutional and institutional adjustment in a period of rapid change. In R. Mudambi, P. Navarra, & G. Sobbrio (Eds.), Economic welfare, international business and global institutional change (pp. 264–293). Cheltenham Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W. F. (2006). An analytical history of terrorism 1945–2000. Public Choice, 128(1–2), 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • www.freedom_house.org./template.cfm?page=351&ana_page=333&year=2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles K. Rowley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowley, C.K., Smith, N. Islam’s democracy paradox: Muslims claim to like democracy, so why do they have so little?. Public Choice 139, 273–299 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9393-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9393-8

Keywords

Navigation