Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ultimate recommendation system: proposed Pranik System

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today's fast-paced world, recommendation systems have become indispensable tools, aiding users in making personalized decisions amidst an overwhelming array of choices. These systems leverage user data and preferences to generate tailor-made recommendations based on individual tastes and behaviors. This research paper introduces the development and implementation of Pranik Movies, an ultimate recommendation system for personalized movie suggestions. The system incorporates collaborative and content-based filtering techniques, utilizing machine learning algorithms to analyze user behaviors, ratings, and viewing histories. A comprehensive overview of the research framework is provided, encompassing system architecture, data pre-processing, feature engineering techniques, and model selection and design. Text processing methods such as stemming, bag-of-words (BoW), and TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency) are employed for processing and analyzing textual movie data. The accuracy of recommendations is enhanced through the assessment of film similarities, utilizing algorithms like cosine similarity and Euclidean distance. The paper concludes by outlining future directions for advanced machine learning techniques, social media integration, expanded content support, and the refinement of the evaluation framework. Pranik Movies signifies a significant advancement in recommendation systems, enabling personalized and precise movie recommendations within a vast and diverse cinematic landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Jiang L, Cheng Y, Yang Li, Li J, Yan H, Wang X (2018) A trust-based collaborative filtering algorithm for e-commerce recommendation system. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(8):3023–3034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0928-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Iwahama K, Hijikata Y, Nishida S (2004) “Content-based filtering system for Music Data,” 2004 International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops. 2004 Workshops. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/saintw.2004.1268677

  3. Wang H, Zhang P, Lu T, Gu H, Gu N (2017) “Hybrid recommendation model based on incremental collaborative filtering and content-based algorithms,” 2017 IEEE 21st International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/cscwd.2017.8066717

  4. He X, Liao L, Zhang H, Nie L, Hu X, Chua (2017) “Neural collaborative filtering,” Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052569

  5. Sharma P, Yadav L (2020) Movie recommendation system using item based collaborative filtering. Int J Innov Res Comput Sci Technol 8(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.21276/ijircst.2020.8.4.2

  6. Zhang H, Gan M, Sun X (2021) Incorporating memory-based preferences and point-of-interest stickiness into recommendations in location-based social networks. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 10(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10010036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tintarev N, Masthoff J (2007) A Survey of Explanations in Recommender Systems. 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 801–810, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2007.4401070

  8. Rendle S (2010) Factorization machines. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp 995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2010.127

  9. Chen B (2022) Data Collection and preprocessing. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science, pp. 5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7369-7_2

  10. Camizuli E, Carranza EJ (2018) Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA). The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, pp. 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0271

  11. Camizuli E, Carranza E (2018) Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA). The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, pp. 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0271

  12. Gallavotti G, Bonetto F, Gentile G (2004) General qualitative properties. Aspects of Ergodic, Qualitative and Statistical Theory of Motion, pp. 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05853-4_1

  13. Dr PN (2020) Leukemia drug prediction using machine learning techniques with feature engineering. J Adv Res Dynamic Control Syst 12(SP4):141–146. https://doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v12sp4/20201475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapoor N, Vishal S, KKS (2020) Movie recommendation system using NLP Tools. 2020 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/icces48766.2020.9137993

  15. Arifsiswandi A, Permana Y, Emarilis A (2021) Stemming analysis indonesian language news text with Porter algorithm. J Phys: Confer Series 1845(1):012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1845/1/012019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohmann S, Heimerl F, Bopp F, Burch M, Ertl T (2015)Concentri Cloud: Word cloud visualization for multiple text documents. 2015 19th International Conference on Information Visualisation. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/iv.2015.30

  17. Passalis N, Tefas A (2018) Learning bag-of-embedded-words representations for textual information retrieval. Pattern Recogn 81:254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Christian H, Agus MP, Suhartono D (2016) “Single Document Automatic text summarization using term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF)”, ComTech: Computer. Math Eng Appl 7(4):285. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v7i4.3746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan X, Cheng J, Xia Y, Zhang X, Wang H (2012) “Which feature is better? TF*IDF feature or topic feature in text clustering,” 2012 Fourth International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/mines.2012.249

  20. Chiny M, Chihab M, Bencharef O, Chihab Y (2021) Netflix recommendation system based on TF-IDF and cosine similarity algorithms. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Modelling and Machine Learning. doi:https://doi.org/10.5220/0010727500003101

  21. Hancock JM (2004) Jaccard distance (Jaccard Index, Jaccard similarity coefficient). Dictionary Bioinform Comput Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471650126.dob0956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kryszkiewicz M (2014)The cosine similarity in terms of the Euclidean distance. Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization, pp. 2498–2508. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6.ch223

  23. Alodadi M, Janeja VP (2015) Similarity in patient support forums using TF-IDF and cosine similarity metrics. 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ichi.2015.99

  24. Alfakih AY (2018) Euclidean distance matrices (EDMS). Euclidean Distance Matrices and Their Applications in Rigidity Theory, pp. 51–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97846-8_3

  25. Adate A, Tripathy BK (2018) 3. Deep Learning techniques for Image Processing. Machine Learning for Big Data Analysis, pp. 69–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551433-003

  26. Besancon R, Rajman M, Chappelier J-C (1999) Textual similarities based on a distributional approach. Proceedings. Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 99 [Preprint]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/dexa.1999.795163

  27. Prajna KB, et al. (2022) Implementation of a hybrid recommendation system for Movies. 2022 IEEE 2nd Mysore Sub Section International Conference (MysuruCon) [Preprint]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/mysurucon55714.2022.9972580

  28. Aggarwal K, et al. (2022) Has the future started? the current growth of artificial intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning. Iraqi J Comput Sci Math, pp. 115–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2022.01.01.013

  29. Wenzel T, et al. (2022) Providing personalised recommendations of critical incident narratives in a cross-platform mobile application. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications [Preprint]. doi:https://doi.org/10.5220/0011528400003323

Download references

Funding

No funding has been received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi NCR Ghaziabad, India

    Vipin Kumar, Amit Kumar Gupta, Nikhil Kumar & Rajeev Kumar

  2. Meerut Institute of Engineering & Technology, Meerut, India

    Ruchi Rani Garg

Authors
  1. Vipin Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amit Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruchi Rani Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nikhil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rajeev Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeev Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Gupta, A.K., Garg, R.R. et al. The ultimate recommendation system: proposed Pranik System. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 43177–43198 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17370-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17370-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation