Skip to main content
Log in

Reciprocal Links Between Teacher-Student Relationships and Peer Victimization: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Early Adolescence

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although teachers play a central role in tackling peer victimization at school, no study so far has investigated transactional associations between positive and negative teacher-student relationship dimensions and peer victimization in early adolescence. Investigating both dimensions simultaneously in upper elementary school allows to examine differential effects on peer victimization (and vice versa) and could aid tailored prevention and intervention efforts. At three time points within one school year, self-reported teacher-student closeness and conflict and self- and peer-reported peer victimization were assessed in a sample of 930 fourth to sixth grade students (Mage = 10.55 years, 53.1% girls). Cross-lagged models revealed negative within-time associations between closeness and self-reported peer victimization, and positive within-time associations between conflict and self-reported peer victimization at most time points. Whereas closeness and conflict negatively predicted each other across the school year, no bidirectional longitudinal effects were found between teacher-student relationships and peer victimization. The current findings highlight the need for early prevention and intervention efforts to tackle peer victimization, build positive teacher-student relationships, and especially reduce negative teacher-student relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D., Williams, R., & Moral-Benito, E. (2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117710578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault, L. (2018). The persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, H.-o, Choo, H., & Lim, C. (2019). Bullying experience of racial and ethnic minority youth in South Korea. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(4), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618776121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjereld, Y. (2018). The challenging process of disclosing bullying victimization: A grounded theory study from the victim’s point of view. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(8), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316644973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. L. W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793-828). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82-99). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1998). Children’s treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. In M. E. Hertzig, & E. A. Farber (Eds.), Annual progress in child psychiatry and child development 1997 (pp. 79–92). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.

  • De Laet, S., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Van den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., & Janssens, A., et al. (2016). Transactional links between teacher–student relationships and adolescent rule-breaking behavior and behavioral school engagement: Moderating role of a dopaminergic genetic profile score. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1226–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0466-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Laet, S., Doumen, S., Vervoort, E., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., & Goossens, L., et al. (2014). Transactional links between teacher–child relationship quality and perceived versus sociometric popularity: a three‐wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 85(4), 1647–1662. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demol, K., Leflot, G., Verschueren, K., & Colpin, H. (2020). Revealing the transactional associations among teacher-child relationships, peer rejection and peer victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2311–2326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01269-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duong, M. T., Pullmann, M. D., Buntain-Ricklefs, J., Lee, K., Benjamin, K. S., & Nguyen, L., et al. (2019). Brief teacher training improves student behavior and student–teacher relationships in middle school. School Psychology, 34(2), 212 https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elledge, L. C., Elledge, A. R., Newgent, R. A., & Cavell, T. A. (2016). Social risk and peer victimization in elementary school children: the protective role of teacher-student relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(4), 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0074-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Claes, S., et al. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: a longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriadis, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., Tsigilis, N., & Verschueren, K. (2020). Teachers’ and children’s perceptions about their relationships: examining the construct of dependency in the Greek sociocultural context. Attachment & Human Development, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1751990.

  • Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., Mainhard, T., Boor-Klip, H. J., & Brekelmans, M. (2017a). Teacher liking as an affective filter for the association between student behavior and peer status. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., Mainhard, T., Oudman, S., Boor-Klip, H. J., & Brekelmans, M. (2017b). Teacher behavior and peer liking and disliking: The teacher as a social referent for peer status. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications (Second ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. N. (2012). Teachers as managers of students’ peer context. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 189–218). Information Age.

  • Inchley, J., Currie, D., Budisavljevic, S., Torsheim, T., Jåstad, A., Cosma, A., et al. (2020). Findings from the 2017/2018 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey in Europe and Canada.: World Health Organization.

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 57(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.2.239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincade, L., Cook, C., & Goerdt, A. (2020). Meta-analysis and common practice elements of universal approaches to improving student-teacher relationships. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 710–748. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320946836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimstra, T. A., Bleidorn, W., Asendorpf, J. B., Van Aken, M. A., & Denissen, J. J. (2013). Correlated change of Big Five personality traits across the lifespan: a search for determinants. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 768–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Košir, K., Klasinc, L., Špes, T., Pivec, T., Cankar, G., & Horvat, M. (2020). Predictors of self-reported and peer-reported victimization and bullying behavior in early adolescents: the role of school, classroom, and individual factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(2), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00430-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, B. J., & Hoglund, W. L. (2009). The effects of peer victimization and physical aggression on changes in internalizing from first to third grade. Child Development, 80(3), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01301.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, B. J., Sukhawathanakul, P., Smith, D., & Bowen, F. (2015). Reciprocal associations between interpersonal and values dimensions of school climate and peer victimization in elementary school children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.873985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Chiu, M. M. (2016). Affective teacher-student relationships and students’ externalizing behavior problems: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1311 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo, D., Settanni, M., Prino, L. E., Parada, R. H., & Longobardi, C. (2019). Exploring the dimensional structure of bullying victimization among primary and lower-secondary school students: Is one factor enough, or do we need more? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 770 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00770.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, P. E. L., Babcock, B., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Crick, N. R. (2013). The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures. Social Development, 22(3), 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Newman, D. A. (2014). Missing data: five practical guidelines. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114548590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

  • Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 751–780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). An empirical comparison of methods of sampling aggression and victimization in school settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C. (2001). Student-teacher relationship scale: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. M. Reynolds, & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 7) Educational psychology (pp. 199-234). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Relationships between children and kindergarten teachers from the teachers’ perspective. In R. C. Pianta (Ed.), Beyond the parent: the role of other adults in children’s lives (pp. 61-80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Raskauskas, J. L., Gregory, J., Harvey, S. T., Rifshana, F., & Evans, I. M. (2010). Bullying among primary school children in New Zealand: Relationships with prosocial behaviour and classroom climate. Educational Research, 52(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881003588097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reavis, R. D., Keane, S. P., & Calkins, S. D. (2010). Trajectories of peer victimization: the role of multiple relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: a meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runions, K. C., & Shaw, T. (2013). Teacher–child relationship, child withdrawal and aggression in the development of peer victimization. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A. (2009). The transactional model. In A. Sameroff (Ed.), The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other (pp. 3–21): American Psychological Association.

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, R. H., Engels, R. C., Overbeek, G., De Kemp, R. A., & Haselager, G. J. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9074-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2008). Peer victimization in Korean preschool children: the effects of child characteristics, parenting behaviours and teacher-child relationships. School Psychology International, 29(5), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308099203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., Thijs, J. T., & Van der Leij, A. (2012). Supporting teachers’ relationships with disruptive children: the potential of relationship-focused reflection. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troop-Gordon, W., & Kopp, J. (2011). Teacher-child relationship quality and children’s peer victimization and aggressive behavior in late childhood. Social Development, 20(3), 536–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00604.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancraeyveldt, C., Verschueren, K., Wouters, S., Van Craeyevelt, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Colpin, H. (2015). Improving teacher-child relationship quality and teacher-rated behavioral adjustment amongst externalizing preschoolers: effects of a two-component intervention. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9892-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verschueren, K., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2020). Dependency in teacher–child relationships: Deepening our understanding of the construct. Attachment & Human Development, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1751986.

  • Verschueren, K., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2012). Teacher–child relationships from an attachment perspective. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vervoort, E., Doumen, S., & Verschueren, K. (2015). Children’s appraisal of their relationship with the teacher: preliminary evidence for construct validity. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.989984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walden, T. A., & Ogan, T. A. (1988). The development of social referencing. Child Development, 59(5), 1230–1240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weyns, T., Colpin, H., De Laet, S., Engels, M., & Verschueren, K. (2018). Teacher support, peer acceptance, and engagement in the classroom: a three-wave longitudinal study in late childhood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0774-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J., Bauman, S., & Corcoran, C. (2020). Role of adults in prevention and intervention of peer victimization. In L. H. Rosen, S. R. Scott, & S. Y. Kim (Eds.), Bullies, Victims, and Bystanders (pp. 179–212): Springer.

  • Zajac, K., & Kobak, R. (2006). Attachment. In G. G. Bear, & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 379–389): National Association of School Psychologists.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants of the study and the master students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at KU Leuven who assisted in the data collection.

Author contributions

I.t.B. conceived the study, created the hypotheses, coordinated the data collection, performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript; K.V. conceived the study, created the hypotheses, interpreted the results, and helped to draft the manuscript; K.D. coordinated the data collection, assisted with the statistical analysis, and gave feedback on the manuscript; F.v.G. coordinated the data collection and gave feedback on the manuscript; H.C. conceived the study, created the hypotheses, interpreted the results, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Grants from Research Foundation Flanders (G071317N) and KU Leuven Research Fund (C24/17/026) supported this study.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel M. ten Bokkel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted in line with ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Social and Societal Ethics Committee (SMEC) of KU Leuven provided ethical approval.

Consent to Participate

Active informed consent was obtained from legal guardians of all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

ten Bokkel, I.M., Verschueren, K., Demol, K. et al. Reciprocal Links Between Teacher-Student Relationships and Peer Victimization: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Early Adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 50, 2166–2180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01490-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01490-4

Navigation