Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis for Behavioral Economics in Social Networks: An Altruism-Based Dynamic Cooperation Model

  • Published:
International Journal of Parallel Programming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at uncooperative behaviors such as free-riding, white-washing and sybil attacks, and the lack of rationality hypothesis in the traditional economic models, the paper presents an Altruism-Based Dynamic Model (ABDM) in social networks by introducing views from reciprocal altruistic theory. Considering the initiative of nodes behind reciprocal altruistic behaviors, the ABDM improves the cooperation rate of the network and promotes the propagation of cooperative behavior by using the nodes’ inherent ability of reciprocal altruism. Furthermore, based on nodes’ bounded rationality, ABDM also perfects models of traditional economic theories. The simulation results show that compared with the traditional model, the proposed ABDM has the higher level of cooperation, the stronger scalability and the better robustness. On this basis, the paper analyzes the ABDM at different scenarios: varying group sizes and population; behavior selection under varying parameter settings (cost-to-benefit ratios of the psychological payoff and etc.). With the more efficient interactions among the nodes, the ABDM model can improve the efficiency of parallel processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Hu, C., et al.: MIRACLE: a multiple independent random walks community parallel detection algorithm for big graphs. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 70, 89–101 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyerhenke, H., Sanders, P., Schulz, C.: Parallel graph partitioning for complex networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 99, 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, S., Mittal, S., Gupta, T., et al.: Parallel quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms for community detection in social networks. Appl. Soft Comput. 61, 331–353 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi, X., Chen, M., He, L., et al.: Mammoth: gearing hadoop towards memory-intensive mapreduce applications. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 26(8), 2300–2315 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, Y.X., Liu, A., Guo, S., et al.: Context-aware collect data with energy efficient in Cyber-physical cloud systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 27(2), 634–639 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, X., Zhao, S., Liu, A., et al.: Knowledge-aware Proactive Nodes Selection approach for energy management in Internet of Things. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.07.022

  7. Magnussen, S.: International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Macmillan Reference (2015)

  8. Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B., et al.: The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: an em-pirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(2), 634–639 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crnovrsanin, T., Muelder, C.W., Faris, R., et al.: Visualization techniques for categorical analysis of social networks with multiple edge sets. Soc. Netw. 37(2), 56–64 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adar, E., Huberman, B.A.: Free riding on Gnutella. First Monday 5(10), 134–139 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Izal, M., Urvoy-Keller, G., Biersack, EW., et al.: Dissecting BitTorrent: five months in a torrent’s lifetime. In: Proceedings of International Workshop, Passive and Active Network Measurement PAM 2004, Antibes Juan-Les-Pins, France. DBLP, 2017, pp. 1–11 (2004)

  12. Saghiri, A.M., Meybodi, M.R.: An approach for designing cognitive engines in cognitive peer-to-peer networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 70, 17–40 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Z., Wang, J., Zhao, Y.: The optimization model of trust for white-washing. In: International Conference on Cloud Computing and Security. Springer International Publishing, pp. 169–180 (2015)

  14. Alsaedi, N., Hashim, F., Sali, A., et al.: Detecting sybil attacks in clustered wireless sensor networks based on energy trust system (ETS). Comput. Commun. 110, 75–82 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ismail, H., Germanus, D., Suri, N.: P2P routing table poisoning: a quorum-based sanitizing ap-proach. Comput. Secur. 65, 283–299 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palomar, E., Alcaide, A., Ribagorda, A., et al.: The Peer’s Dilemma: a general framework to examine cooperation in pure peer-to-peer systems. Comput. Netw. 56(17), 3756–3766 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y., Xu, H., Cao, Q., et al.: Evolutionary game-based trust strategy adjustment among nodes in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015, 1–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Buttyn, L., Dra, L., Flegyhzi, M., et al.: Barter trade improves message delivery in opportunistic networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 8(1), 1–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ning, Z., Liu, L., Xia, F., et al.: CAIS: a copy adjustable incentive scheme in community-based socially-aware networking. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 66(4), 3406–3419 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tseng, Y.M., Chen, F.G.: A free-rider aware reputation system for peer-to-peer file-sharing net-works. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(3), 2432–2440 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez-Canovas, G., et al.: A formal model based on game theory for the analysis of cooperation in distributed service discovery. Inf. Sci. 326, 59–70 (2015)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo, J., Choi, S., Han, S.: The method of trust and reputation systems based on link prediction and clustering. In: IFIP International Conference on Trust Management. Springer, Berlin, pp. 223–230 (2017)

  23. Caverlee, J., Liu, L., Webb, S.: Towards robust trust establishment in web-based social networks with socialtrust. In: International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2008, Beijing, China. DBLP, pp. 1163–1164 (2008)

  24. Barbian G. Assessing Trust by Disclosure in Online Social Networks[C]// International Con-ference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Asonam: Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 25–27 July. DBLP 2011, 163–170 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Trifunovic, S., Legendre, F., Anastasiades, C.: Social trust in opportunistic networks. In: IN-FOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, pp. 1–6 (2010)

  26. Fu, H., Li, H., Zheng, Z., et al.: Optimal system maneuver for trust management in social networks (2016, preprint). arXiv:1604.07139

  27. Mtibaa, A., Harras, KA.: Social-based trust in mobile opportunistic networks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pp. 1–6 (2011)

  28. Najaflou, Y., Jedari, B., Xia, F., et al.: Safety challenges and solutions in mobile social net-works. IEEE Syst. J. 9(3), 834–854 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bigwood, G., Henderson, T.: IRONMAN using social networks to add incentives and repu-tation to opportunistic networks. In: Passat, socialcom: Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust. DBLP 2011, pp. 65–72 (2011)

  30. Vegni, A.M., Loscri, V.: A survey on vehicular social networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(4), 2397–2419 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhai, C., Zhang, W., Mao, G.: Cooperative spectrum sharing between cellular and ad-hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 13(7), 4025–4037 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Syue, S.J., Wang, C.L., Aguilar, T., Gauthier, V., Afifi, H.: Cooperative geographic routing with radio coverage extension for SER-constrained wireless relay networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 30(2), 271–279 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, H.C., Liao, W.I.: Cooperative strategies in wireless relay networks. EEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 30(2), 323–330 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mullainathan, S., Thaler, R.H.: Behavioral economics. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences vol. 76, pp, 1094–1100 (2001)

  35. Hursh, S.R., Roma, P.G.: Behavioral economics and the analysis of consumption and choice. Manag. Decis. Econ. 37(4–5), 224–238 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Milinski, M., Lling, D.K., Kettler, R.: Tit for Tat: sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) trusting’ a cooperating partner. Behav. Ecol. 1(1), 7–11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Takano, M., Wada, K., Fukuda, I.: Reciprocal altruism-based cooperation in a social network game. New Gener. Comput. 34(3), 257–272 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamamura, E., Tsutsui, Y., Ohtake, F.: Altruistic and selfish motivations of charitable giving: case of the hometown tax donation system. Iser Discussion Paper (2017)

  39. Guss, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B.: An experimental analysis of ul-timatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3, 367–388 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., Mcelreath, R.: In seach of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(2), 73–78 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Camerer, C.F.: Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Fehr, E., Simon, G.: Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90(4), 980–994 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Guth, W., Tietz, R.: Ultimatum bargaining behavior:a survey and comparison of experimental results. J. Econ. Psychol. 11, 417–449 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. de Quervain, D.J., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., et al.: The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305(5688), 1254–1258 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Qiu, D., Srikant, R.: Modeling and performance analysis of bittorrent-like peer-to-peer networks. In: The 2004 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM’04), Portland, pp. 367–378 (2004)

  46. Shah, V., Veciana, G.D., Kesidis, G.: A stable approach for routing queries in unstructured P2P networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 24(5), 3136–3147 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cox, J.C.: How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 46(2), 260–281 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Brosig-Koch, J., Riechmann, T., Weimann, J.: The dynamics of behavior in modified dictator games. PLoS ONE 12(4), e0176199 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rezaei, G., Kirley, M.: Dynamic social networks facilitate cooperation in the N-player prisoner’s dilemma. Physica A 391(23), 6199–6211 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. O’Riordan, C., Cunningham, A., Sorensen, H.: Emergence of cooperation in n-player games on small world networks. In: S. Bullock, J. Noble, R. Watson,M.A. Bedau (Eds.), Artificial Life XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 436–442 (2008)

  51. Kalaignanam, K., Kushwaha, T., Swartz, T.A.: The differential impact of NPD make/buy choices on immediate and future product quality: insights from the automobile industry. Social Science Electronic Publishing (2017)

  52. Boyd, R., Richerson, P.: The evolution of reciprocity in sizeable groups. J. Theor. Biol. 132, 337–356 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Loss aversion risk less choice a reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econ. 106(4), 1039–61 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under Risk. Econo-metrica 47(2), 263–91 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Arellano, M., Bond, S.: Some tests of specification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58(2), 277–297 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Ellis, T.S., Yao, X.: Evolving cooperation in the non-iterated prisoners dilemma: a social network inspired approach. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 736–743 (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61572528.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China

    Deng Li & Zhujun Chen

  2. School of Software, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China

    Jiaqi Liu

Authors
  1. Deng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhujun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiaqi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaqi Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Chen, Z. & Liu, J. Analysis for Behavioral Economics in Social Networks: An Altruism-Based Dynamic Cooperation Model. Int J Parallel Prog 47, 686–708 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10766-018-0559-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10766-018-0559-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation