Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MEASURING SCIENCE INTEREST: RASCH VALIDATION OF THE SCIENCE INTEREST SURVEY

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Students in the USA have fallen near the bottom in international competitions and tests in mathematics and science. It is thought that extrinsic factors such as family, community, and schools might be more influential than intrinsic attitudes toward science interest. However, there are relatively few valid and reliable measures of intrinsic factors such as interest relating to science. With the lack of intrinsic measures, it is difficult to determine the impact of extrinsic factors on the intrinsic construct. A fuller picture of the factors affecting intrinsic factors such as science interest will allow interventions to become more refined and targeted. Several studies suggest that student interest toward science affects the likelihood of the student pursuing advanced courses in science. The goal of this paper is to establish the validity and reliability of the Science Interest Survey and to determine if the survey meets the formal requirements of measurements as defined by the Rasch model. Results using both IRT and CRT analysis suggest that Science Interest Survey is an adequate measure of the unidimensional construct known as science interest. Results further suggest the Science Interest Survey is a valid and reliable measure for assessing science interest levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S. & Berndorff, D. (1999). Situational and individual interest in cognitive and affective aspects of learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meetings. Montreal, Quebec, Canada

  • Ainely, M., Hidi, S. & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological process that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, M. (2006). Connection with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition of interest. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B. & Ginns, I. S. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annetta, L., Minogue, M., Holmes, S. & Cheng, M. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics, Computers in Education, 53(1), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, M. M., Wiggins, J. & Gardner, C. M. (1995). A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 665–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercises of control. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A., Tan, E. & Rivet, A. (2010). Creating spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betemps, E., Smith, R. & Baker, D. (2003). Measurement precision of the clinician administered PTSD scale: A Rasch model analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(1), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davis, C., Bassett, P. & Chowne, A. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group work on pupil–pupil and teacher–pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 750–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S. & Michelli, N. (2006). Complex by design. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Roundtable (2005). Tapping America’s potential: The education for innovation initiative. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.itic.org/archives/TAP%20Statement.pdf

  • Bulunuz, M. & Jarret, O. (2010). Developing an interest in science: Background experience of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christidou, V. (2011). Interest, attitudes and images related to science: Combining students’ voices with voices of school, science teachers and popular science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(2), 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, S. (2001). Closing gaps in middle grades. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 479 781.

  • Edgar, K. & Fox, N. (2006). Temperamental contributions to children’s performance in an emotion-word processing task: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Brain and Cognition, 65(1), 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Workforce Commission (2008) Engineering and technology degrees, 2007 (Washington, DC). www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/tabc-8.pdf

  • Falk, J. H. & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from Museums. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. 272 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L., MacCallum, R., Wegener, D. & Strahan, E. (1999). Evaluation the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J., Alfeld, C. & Eccles, J. (2010). Developing and fostering passion in academic and nonacademic domains. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, R. & Kaplan, D. (1997). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. Science Education, 82, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D. & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009–001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. Durik, A, Barron, K., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. & Tauer, J. (2007). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmner, A. & Columba, L. (2010). Engaging middle school students in nanoscale science, nanotechnology, and electron microscopy. Journal of Nano Education, 2(1), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, A. & Jones, L. (1998). Engaging children in science (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. (2006). Flow, enduring, and situational involvement in the Web environment: A tripartite second-order examination. Psychology and Marketing, 23(5), 383–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., Alexander, J., Spencer, S., Leibham, M. & Neitzel, C. (2004). Factors associate with the early emergence of intense interests within conceptual domains. Cognitive Development, 19(3), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. C. & Viadero, D. (2000). Unmet promise: Raising minority achievement. Edweek.org.

  • Jones, M. & Eick, C. (2007). Implementing inquiry kit curriculum: Obstacles, adaptations, and practical knowledge development in two middle school science teachers. Science Education, 91(3), 492–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2005). Learning implicit user interest hierarchy for web personalization, A dissertation submitted to Florida Institute of Technology, In Computer Science.

  • Krapp, A., Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. (1992). The role of interest and learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2007). An educational–psychological conceptualization of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamoureux, E., Pallant, J., Pesudovs, K., Hassell, J. & Keefe, J. (2006). The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: An evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47(11), 4732–4741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzilotti, R. & Montinaro, F. (2009). Influence of students’ motivation on their experience with e-learning systems: And experimental study. Universal Access in Human and Computer Interaction, 56(16), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (1997). Investigating judge local independence. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 11(1), 546–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness, Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. B. (1995). Coefficient alpha: A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(3), 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2003). Program for International Student Assessment. http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2003highlights.asp.

  • Nieswandt, M. (2006). Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 908–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou, C. (2002). School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science: Based on TIMSS data for Cyprus. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, L., Alonso, J. & Lamarca, R. (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, Oxford, England: Nielsen & Lydiche. Xiii, 184.

  • Rennie, L. J. & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). The communication of science and technology: Past, present and future agendas. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 759–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A. J. (1991). The middle schooling process: Influences on science and mathematics achievement from the longitudinal study of American youth. Adolescence, 26, 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. & Vollmeyer, R. (1998). Does motivation affect performance via persistence. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, J. & Golombok, S. (2009). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1998). Individual interest and learning, what we know and what we don’t know. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. Renninger & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 91–104). Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D., Koballa, T. R., Oliver, J. S. & Crawley, F. E. (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. L. Grabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D. & Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences on commitment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 66, 763–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. M. & Hausafus, C. O. (1998). Relationship of family support and ethnic minority students’ achievement in science and mathematics. Science Education, 82, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoon, I., Ross, A. & Martin, P. (2007). Science related careers: Aspirations and outcomes in two British cohort studies. Equal Opportunities International, 26(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J., Campione-Barr, N. & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullenger, K. (2006). Beyond school walls: Informal education and the culture of science. Education Canada, 46, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V. & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talton, E. L. & Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationships between peer and individual attitudes toward science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69, 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talton, E. L. & Simpson, R. D. (1986). Relationships of attitudes toward self, family, and school with attitude toward science among adolescents. Science Education, 70, 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. (1947). Multiple Factor Analysis, Thurstone, LL., University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

  • Wright, B. D. (1996). Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9(4), 472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E. & Penick, J. E. (1986). Perceptions of four age groups toward science classes, teachers, and the value of science. Science Education, 70, 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharia, Z. & Barton, A. (2004). Urban middle-school students’ attitudes toward a defined science. Science Education, 88, 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Richard Lawrence Lamb, Leonard Annetta & David Vallett

  2. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Jeannette Meldrum

Authors
  1. Richard Lawrence Lamb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonard Annetta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeannette Meldrum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Vallett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Lawrence Lamb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamb, R.L., Annetta, L., Meldrum, J. et al. MEASURING SCIENCE INTEREST: RASCH VALIDATION OF THE SCIENCE INTEREST SURVEY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 643–668 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9314-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9314-z

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation