Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Taxonomic Resolution and Quantification of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Samples from an Australian Dryland River: The Benefits and Costs of Using Species Abundance Data

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In studies using macroinvertebrates as indicators for monitoring rivers and streams, species level identifications in comparison with lower resolution identifications can have greater information content and result in more reliable site classifications and better capacity to discriminate between sites, yet many such programmes identify specimens to the resolution of family rather than species. This is often because it is cheaper to obtain family level data than species level data. Choice of appropriate taxonomic resolution is a compromise between the cost of obtaining data at high taxonomic resolutions and the loss of information at lower resolutions. Optimum taxonomic resolution should be determined by the information required to address programme objectives. Costs saved in identifying macroinvertebrates to family level may not be justified if family level data can not give the answers required and expending the extra cost to obtain species level data may not be warranted if cheaper family level data retains sufficient information to meet objectives. We investigated the influence of taxonomic resolution and sample quantification (abundance vs. presence/absence) on the representation of aquatic macroinvertebrate species assemblage patterns and species richness estimates. The study was conducted in a physically harsh dryland river system (Condamine-Balonne River system, located in south-western Queensland, Australia), characterised by low macroinvertebrate diversity. Our 29 study sites covered a wide geographic range and a diversity of lotic conditions and this was reflected by differences between sites in macroinvertebrate assemblage composition and richness. The usefulness of expending the extra cost necessary to identify macroinvertebrates to species was quantified via the benefits this higher resolution data offered in its capacity to discriminate between sites and give accurate estimates of site species richness. We found that very little information (<6%) was lost by identifying taxa to family (or genus), as opposed to species, and that quantifying the abundance of taxa provided greater resolution for pattern interpretation than simply noting their presence/absence. Species richness was very well represented by genus, family and order richness, so that each of these could be used as surrogates of species richness if, for example, surveying to identify diversity hot-spots. It is suggested that sharing of common ecological responses among species within higher taxonomic units is the most plausible mechanism for the results. Based on a cost/benefit analysis, family level abundance data is recommended as the best resolution for resolving patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages in this system. The relevance of these findings are discussed in the context of other low diversity, harsh, dryland river systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Meteorology, 2003. http://www.bom. gov.au/

  • Bailey R. C., Norris R. H. and Reynoldson T. B. (2001). Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 280–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton D. R. (1996). The use of percent model affinity to assess the effects of agriculture on benthic invertebrate communities in headwater streams of southern Ontario, Canada. Freshwater Biology 36: 397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belbin L. (1993). PATN Technical Reference. CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • (1992). A National Strategy for the Conservation of Australia’s Biological Diversity. Department of Arts, Sports, Environment and Territories, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman M. F. and Bailey R. C. (1998). Does taxonomic resolution effect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate communities?. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1802–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray J. R. and Curtis J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities in Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn S. E. and Davies P. M. (1999). Aquatic food webs in turbid, arid-zone rivers: preliminary data from Cooper Creek, western Queensland. In: Kingsford, R. T. (eds) Free-flowing River: the Ecology of the Paroo River, pp 67–76. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalkley S., Brendan E. and Gowland K. (1999). Who is watching our water? Waterwatch Australia. In: Rutherford, I. D. and Bartley, R. (eds) The Challenge of Rehabilitating Australia’s Streams, pp 163–168. CRC for Catchment Hydrologh, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessman B. C. (1995). Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: a procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman B. C. (2003). New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates. Marine and Freshwater Research 54: 95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman B. C., Grownes J. E. and Kotlash A. R. (1997). Objective derivation of macroinvertebrate sensitivity grade numbers for the SIGNAL biotic index: application to the Hunter River system, New South Wales. Marine and Freshwater Research 48: 159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choy S. C. and Marshall J. C. (2000). Predictive modelling for river health assessment. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung Limnologie 27: 828–833

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choy S. C., Marshall J. C. and Conrick D. L. (2000). Flow requirements of aquatic invertebrates. In: Arthington, A. H.,, Brizga, S. O., Choy, S. C., Kennard, M. J., Mackay, S. J., McCosker, R. O., Ruffini, J. L., and Zalucki, J. M. (eds) Environmental Flow Requirements of the Brisbane River Downstream from Wivenhoe Dam, pp. South East Queensland Water Corporation and Centre for Catchment and In-Stream Research, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy S. C., Thomson C. B. and Marshall J. C. (2001). Ecological condition of central Australian arid-zone rivers. Water Science and Technology 45: 225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K. R. and Gorley R. N. (2001). Primer v5: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K. R. and Warwick R. M. (1994). Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Cransten P. and Hillman T. (1992). Rapid assessment of biodiversity using “Biological Diversity Technicians”. Australian Biologist 5: 144–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies P. E. (1994). National River Process and Management Program Monitoring River Health Initiative. River Bioassessment Manual Version 1.0. Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Derraik J. G. B., Closs G. P., Dickenson K. J. M., Sirvid P., Barratt B. I. P. and Patrick B. H. (2002). Arthropod morphospecies versus taxonomic species: a case study with aranae, coleoptera and lepidoptera. Conservation Biology 16: 1015–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro S. P. and Cole F. A. (1992). Taxonomic level sufficient for assessing a moderate impact on macrobenthic communities in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 1184–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furse M. T., Moss D., Wright J. F. and Armitage P. D. (1984). The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running-water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 14: 257–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch H. G. (1982). Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower J. C. (1971). Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In: Hodson, F. R., Kendall, D. G. and Tautu, P. (eds) Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, pp 138–149. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Growns J. E. and Growns I. O. (1997). Predicting species richness for Australasian freshwater macroinvertebrates: do we want to know? Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56: 483–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerold F. (2000). Influence of taxonomic determination level on several community indices. Water Research 34: 487–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawking J. and Theischinger G. (1999). Dragonfly Larvae (Odonata), A Guide to the Identification of Larvae of Australian Families and Identification and Ecology of Larvae from New South Wales. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Albury and Australian Water Technologies Pty Ltd, West Ryde, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins C. P. and Norris R. H. (2000). Effects of taxonomic resolution and use of subsets of the fauna on the performance of RIVPACS-type models. In: Wright, J. F., Sutcliffe, D. W. and Furse, M. T. (eds) Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques, pp 217–228. Freshwater Biological Association, UK, Ambleside

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins C. P., Norris R. H., Hogue J. N. and Feminella J. W. (2000). Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring the biological integrity of streams. Ecological Applications 10: 1456–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett R. (2000). Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S. H. (1997). Functional importance vs keystoneness: reformulating some questions in theoretical biocenology. Australian Journal of Ecology 22: 369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett I. G. (1993). A method for objectively identifying pool, run and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 27: 241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway S. J. (1993). Water Quality Management in the Condamine-Balonne-Culgoa Catchment. Condamine Balonne Water Committee, Dalby, Queensland, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • King R. S. and Richardson C. J. (2002). Evaluating subsampling approaches and macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution for wetland bioassessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21: 150–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat D. R. (1988). Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat D. R. (1993). A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat D. R. and Penrose D. L. (1980). Discussion of “Hierarchical diversity of communities of aquatic insects and fishes” by R.L. Kaesler and E.E. Herricks. Water Research Bulletin 16: 361–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant R. (1989). A subsampler for samples of benthic invertebrates. Bulletin of the Australian Society for Limnology 12: 49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant R. (1990). Robustness of classification and ordination techniques applied to macroinvertebrate communities from the La Trobe River, Victoria. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 41: 493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant R., Barmuta L. A. and Chessman B. C. (1995). Influence of sample quantification and taxonomic resolution on the ordination of macroinvertebrate communities from running waters in Victoria, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 46: 501–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J. C. (2001). Factors influencing the composition of faunal assemblages in rainforest stream pools. Ph.D. Thesis. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J., S. Choy, G. McGregor, B. Cockayne, P. Negus, C. Marshall, D. Conrick, C. Thomson, J. Lobegeiger, D. Johnson, P. Davies, D. Moffatt & B. Harch, 2001. Relationships between the ecological condition of rivers and modifications to their flow regimes: an integrated study using multiple indicators. In Rutherford, I., F. Sheldon, G. Brierley & C. Kenyon (eds), Proceedings of the Third Australian Stream Management Conference: The Value of Healthy Streams; 27–29 August 2001, Brisbane, Australia. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Monash University, (2): 413–419

  • Marshall J. C., Hoang H., Choy S. and Recknagel F. (2002). Relationships between habitat properties and the occurrence of macroinvertebrates in Queensland streams (Australia) discovered by a sensitivity analysis with artificial neural networks. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung Limnologie 28: 1415–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J., Steward A., McGregor G., Marshall C., Negus P., Johnson D., Lobegeiger J., Davies P., Harch B., Winning W., Choy S. and Cockayne B. (2003). Condamine-Balonne Integrated Monitoring Pilot Project: Methods. Aquatic Ecosystems Technical Report No. 41. Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzeling L., Chessman B., Hardwick R. and Wong V. (2003). Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the role of experience, and comparisons with quantitative methods. Hydrobiologia 510: 39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzeling L. and Miller J. (2001). Evaluation of the sample size used for the rapid bioassessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 444: 159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzeling L., Robinson D., Perriss S. and Marchant R. (2002). Temporal persistence of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in south-eastern Australian streams: taxonomic resolution and implications for the use of predictive models. Marine and Freshwater Research 53: 1223–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsgard F., Somerfield P. J. and Carr M. R. (1998). Relationships between taxonomic resolution, macrobenthic community patterns and disturbance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 172: 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff N. L. (1997). Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh V. H. and McElravy E. P. (1993). Contemporary quantitative approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg, D. M. and Resh, V. H. (eds) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, pp 159–194. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh V. H., Norris R. H. and Barbour M. T. (1995). Design and implementation of rapid assessment approaches for water resource monitoring using macroinvertebrates. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh V. H. and Unzicker J. D. (1975). Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 47: 9–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson T. B., Norris R. H., Resh V. H., Day K. E. and Rosenberg D. M. (1997). The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 833–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutt G. P., Weatherley N. S. and Ormerod S. J. (1990). Relationships between the physicochemistry and macro-invertebrates of British upland streams: the development of modelling and indicator systems for predicting fauna and detecting acidity. Freshwater Biology 24: 463–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J. and Norris R. H. (2000). Biological assessment of water quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In: Wright, J. F., Sutcliffe, D. W. and Furse, M. T. (eds) RIVPACS and Similar Techniques for Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters, pp 125–142. Freshwater Biological Association and Environment Agency, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns S. C. (1989). The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. BioScience 39: 436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stribling J. B. and Lester G. T. (2003). Determining the quality of taxonomic data. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 621–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoms M. C. and Sheldon F. (2000). Lowland rivers: an Australian perspective. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 16: 375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueman J. W. H. and Cranston P. S. (1997). Prospects for the rapid assessment of terrestrial invertebrate biodiversity. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56: 349–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift M. A., Ward T. J. and Jacoby C. A. (1996). Effect of reducing taxonomic resolution on ordinations to detect pollution-induced gradients in macrobenthic infaunal assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 136: 137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift M. A., Ward T. J. and Phillips J. C. (1998). Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity. Biological Conservation 86: 307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite I. R., Herlihy A. T., Larsen D. P., Urquhart N. S. and Klemm D. J. (2004). The effects of macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution in large landscape bioassessments: an example from the Mid-Atlantic Highlands, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 49: 474–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker K. F., Sheldon F. and Puckridge J. T. (1995). A perspective on dryland river ecosystems. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11: 85–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P. H. and Gaston K. J. (1994). Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher taxon-richness predict wholesale species richness?. Biological Conservation 67: 211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright I. A., Chessman B. C., Fairweather P. G. and Benson L. J. (1995). Measuring the impact of sewage effluent on the macroinvertebrate community of an upland stream: the effect of different levels of taxonomic resolution and quantification. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J. F. (1995). Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J. F., Armitage P. D., Furse M. T. and Moss D. (1985). The classification and prediction of macroinvertebrate communities in British rivers. Fifty-third annual report of the Freshwater Biological Association. Freshwater Biological Association, Windemere, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J. F., Armitage P. D., Furse M. T. and Moss D. (1989). Prediction of invertebrate communities using stream measurements. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 4: 147–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan C. Marshall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, J.C., Steward, A.L. & Harch, B.D. Taxonomic Resolution and Quantification of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Samples from an Australian Dryland River: The Benefits and Costs of Using Species Abundance Data. Hydrobiologia 572, 171–194 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-9007-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-9007-0

Keywords

Navigation