Abstract
I offer some theoretical insights to help us better understand the moderator effect of political orientation that Larry Hamilton and others have found in recent years. Reflexive modernization theory highlights an emerging tension between those who direct attention to the negative consequences of industrial capitalism such as climate change (e.g., the scientific community and environmental organizations) and those who defend the economic system against such critiques (e.g., the conservative movement). Political divisions in the American public increasingly map onto these societal divisions between critics and defenders of the industrial capitalist order—especially for the issue of climate change. This alignment is facilitated by increased polarization among political elites and balkanization of the news media. Strong evidence of the moderator effect is consistent with the expectations of information processing theory and elite cues hypothesis from political science. Recent empirical findings in political psychology and neuroscience also seem pertinent for explaining this moderator effect. I end by outlining a few implications for climate change research and communication.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amodio DM, Jost JT, Master SL, Yee CM (2007) Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nat Neurosci 10:1246–1247
Baum MA, Groeling T (2008) New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Polit Commun 25:345–365
Beck U (1992) Risk society: toward a new modernity. Sage, London
Beck U (1997) The reinvention of politics. Polity, Cambridge
Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (eds) (1994) Reflexive modernization: politics, traditions, and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Change 14:125–136
Cohen R, Bell P (2007) Congressional insiders poll. Natl J 39(5):6–7
Dispensa JM, Brulle RJ (2003) Media’s social construction of environmental issues. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 23:74–105
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment 50(5):26–35
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2010) Climate change denial: sources, actors, and strategies. In: Lever-Tracy C (ed) The Routledge international handbook of climate change and society, pp 240–259
Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1984) Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Soc Sci Q 65:1013–1028
Dunlap RE, Xiao C, McCright AM (2001) Politics and environment in America: partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Env Polit 10(4):23–48
Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE (2010) System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of ‘system-sanctioned change’. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 36:326–338
Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity, Oxford
Gleeson B (2000) Reflexive modernization. Int Plan Stud 5:117–135
Hall RFL (1994) The fairness doctrine and the first amendment: phoenix rising. Mercer Law Rev 45:705–772
Hamilton LC (2008) Who cares about polar regions? Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:671–678
Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics, and opinions about climate change: evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change
Hamilton LC, Keim BD (2009) Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int J Climatol 29:2348–2352
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007, vol 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Published for the intergovernmental panel on climate change
Iyengar S, Hahn K (2009) Red media, blue media. J Commun 59:19–39
Jost JT, Nosek BA, Gosling SD (2008) Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspect Psychol Sci 3(2):126–136
Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Visser PS (2000) The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Underst Sci 9:239–260
Lahsen M (2005) Technocracy, democracy, and U. S. climate politics. Sci Technol Human Values 30:137–169
Lahsen M (2008) Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: a cultural analysis of a physicist ‘trio’ supporting the backlash against global warming. Glob Environ Change 18:204–219
Lupia A, McCubbins MD (1998) The democratic dilemma. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G (2009) The association of knowledge with concern about global warming. Risk Anal 29:633–647
McCarty N, Poole K, Rosenthal H (2006) Polarized America. MIT, Cambridge
McCright AM (2007) Dealing with climate change contrarians. In: Moser SC, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 200–212
McCright AM (2009) The social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and policy support in the US general public. Hofstra Law Rev 34:1017–1047
McCright AM (2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul Environ 32:66–87
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2000) Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter claims. Soc Probl 47(4):499–522
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc Probl 50(3):348–373
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2010) Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory Cult Soc 27(2–3):100–133
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change: political polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociol Quart 52:Forthcoming
McCright AM, Shwom RL (2010) Newspaper and television coverage. In: Schneider SH, Rosencranz A, Mastrandrea MD, Kuntz-Duriseti K (eds) Climate change science and policy. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 405–413
Michaels D (2008) Doubt is their product. Oxford University Press, New York
Mol APJ (2000) The environmental movement in an era of ecological modernization. Geoforum 31:45–56
Mol APJ, Spaargaren G (2000) Ecological modernization theory in debate. Env Polit 9:17–49
Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New York
Oreskes N, Conway EM, Shindell M (2008) From chicken little to dr. pangloss: William Nierenberg, global warming, and the social deconstruction of scientific knowledge. Hist Stud Nat Sci 38:109–152
Schnaiberg A (1980) The environment: from surplus to scarcity. Oxford University Press, New York
Wood BD, Vedlitz A (2007) Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. Am J Polit Sci 51:552–568
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCright, A.M. Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concern about climate change. Climatic Change 104, 243–253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9946-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9946-y