Abstract
This paper proposes a new multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model that uses a series of existing intuitive and analytical methods to systematically capture both objective and subjective beliefs and preferences from a group of decision makers (DMs). A defuzzification method that combines entropy and the theory of displaced ideal synthesizes crisp values from the DMs’ subjective judgments. This approach assists the DMs in their selection process by plotting alternatives in a four quadrant graph and considering their Euclidean distance from the “ideal” choice. A pilot study illustrates the details of the proposed method. The DMs were a group of graduate students from the University of Paderborn in Germany. The pilot study concerned the addition of new members into the European Union (EU), a decision that has profound economic and political effects on both the entering and existing members of the Union. The DMs were required to consider a large number of internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats in assessing the decision to enlarge the EU. Although the pilot study was not performed by actual DMs from the EU, it was an excellent platform for testing the proposed model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abacoumkin, C., & Ballis, A. (2004). Development of an expert system for the evaluation of conventional and innovative technologies in the intermodal transport area. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 420–436.
Ali, Y. M., & Zhang, L. (2001). A methodology for fuzzy modeling of engineering systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 181–197.
Anderson, C., & Vince, J. (2002). Strategic marketing management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Bailey, D., Goonetilleke, A., & Campbell, D. (2003). A new fuzzy multicriteria evaluation method for group site selection in GIS. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 12, 337–347.
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Norwell: Kluwer Academic.
Benoit, J. (1994). Water quality management with imprecise information. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(1), 15–27.
Buyukozkan, G., & Feyzioglu, O. (2002). A fuzzy logic based decision making approach for new product development. International Journal of Production Economics, 90, 27–45.
Costa, J. P., Melo, P., Godinho, P., & Dias, L. C. (2003). The AGAP system: a GDSS for project analysis and evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 287–303.
De Luca, A., & Termini, S. (1972). A definition of a non-probabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy set theory. Information and Control, 20, 301–312.
Duarte, C., Ettkin, L. P., Helms, M. M., & Anderson, M. S. (2006). The challenge of Venezuela: a SWOT analysis. Competitiveness Review, 16(3/4), 233–247.
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1993). Fuzzy sets and probability: misunderstandings, bridges and gaps. In Proceedings of the second international conference on fuzzy systems (pp. 1059–1068).
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (2000). Fundamentals of fuzzy sets. Norwel: Kluwer Academic.
Dyer, J. S. (1990a). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 36(3), 249–258.
Dyer, J. S. (1990b). A clarification of ‘Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process’. Management Science, 36(3), 274–275.
Eleye-Datubo, A. G., Wall, A., & Wang, J. (2008). Marine and offshore safety assessment by incorporative risk modeling in a fuzzy-Bayesian network of an induced mass assignment paradigm. Risk Analysis, 28(1), 95–112.
Expert Choice [Computer Software] (2006). Decision support software, Inc., McLean, VA.
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. London: Tavistock.
Friedlob, G. T., & Schleifer, L. L. F. (1999). Fuzzy logic: application for audit risk and uncertainty. Managerial Auditing Journal, 14(3), 127–137.
Ghazinoory, S., Esmail Zadeh, A., & Memariani, A. (2007). Fuzzy SWOT analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 18, 99–108.
Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2007). Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Science, 53, 1452–1466.
Gouveia, M. C., Dias, L. C., & Antunes, C. H. (2008). Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 54–63.
Graves, S. B., & Ringuest, J. L. (1991). Evaluating competing R&D investments. Research-Technology Management, 34(4), 32–36.
Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 33, 1383–1403.
Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1990). Reply to ‘Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process’ by J. S. Dyer. Management Science, 36(3), 269–273.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2000). Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization (4th ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 211–228.
Hsieh, T.-Y., Lu, S.-T., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 573–584.
Jahan-Shahi, H., Shayan, E., & Masood, S. (1999). Cost estimation in flat plate processing using fuzzy sets. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37(1–2), 485–488.
Kajanus, M., Kangas, J., & Kurttila, M. (2004). The use of value focused thinking and the A’WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management, 25(4), 499–506.
Kaliszewski, I. (2006). Soft computing for complex multiple criteria decision making. Berlin: Springer.
Kim, S. H., & Ahn, B. S. (1999). Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(3), 498–507.
Kleindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. C., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Decision sciences: an integrative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic, theory and applications. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41–52.
Leyva-Lopez, J. C., & Fernandez-Gonzalez, E. (2003). A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 148, 14–27.
Liesiö, J., Mild, P., & Salo, A. (2007). Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 1488–1505.
Lin, C., & Hsieh, P. J. (2003). A fuzzy decision support system for strategic portfolio management. Decision Support Systems, 38, 383–398.
Lootsma, F. A., Mensch, T. C. A., & Vos, F. A. (1990). Multi-criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long-term research planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 47(3), 293–305.
Masozera, M. K., Alavalapati, J. R. R., Jacobson, S. K., & Shrestha, R. K. (2006). Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe forest reserve, Rwanda. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(2), 206–216.
Mathieu, R. G., & Gibson, J. E. (1993). A methodology for large-scale R&D planning based on cluster analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 40(3), 283–292.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Mojsilovi, A., Ray, B., Lawrence, R., & Takriti, S. (2007). A logistic regression framework for information technology outsourcing lifecycle management. Computers and Operations Research, 34, 3609–3627.
Muzzioli, S., & Reynaerts, H. (2007). The solution of fuzzy linear systems by non-linear programming: a financial application. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2), 1218–1231.
Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M., Autry, C. W., & Bond, E. U., III (2004). Dual-perspective SWOT: a synthesis of marketing intelligence and planning. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(1), 84–94.
Osawa, Y., & Murakami, M. (2002). Development and application of a new methodology of evaluating industrial R&D projects. Research & Development Management, 32, 79–85.
Paisittanand, S., & Olson, D. L. (2006). A simulation study of IT outsourcing in the credit card business. European Journal of Operational Research, 175, 1248–1261.
Panagiotou, G. (2003). Bringing SWOT into focus. Business Strategy Review, 14(2), 8–10.
Pap, E., Bosnjak, Z., & Bosnjak, S. (2000). Application of fuzzy sets with different t-norms in the interpretation of portfolio matrices in strategic management. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 123–131.
Poyhonen, M. A., Hamalainen, R. P., & Salo, A. A. (1997). An experiment on the numerical modelling of verbal ratio statements. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6(1), 1–10.
Rolly Intan, R., & Mukaidono, M. (2004). Fuzzy conditional probability relations and their applications in fuzzy information systems. Knowledge and Information Systems, 6(3), 345–365.
Roychowdhury, S., & Pedrycz, W. (2001). A survey of defuzzification strategies. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 16, 679–695.
Runkler, T. A. (1996). Extended defuzzification methods and their properties. IEEE Transactions, 694–700.
Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary? European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85–91.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1989). Decision making, scaling, and number crunching. Decision Sciences, 20, 404–409.
Saaty, T. L. (1990a). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26.
Saaty, T. L. (1990b). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper ‘Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process’. Management Science, 36(3), 259–268.
Saaty, T. L. (2006). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsbutgh: RWS.
Saaty, T. L., & Sodenkamp, M. (2008). Making decisions in hierarchic and network systems. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 1(1), 24–79.
Saaty, T. L., & Tran, L. T. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), 962–975.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.
Shinno, H., Yoshioka, H., Marpaung, S., & Hachiga, S. (2006). Quantitative SWOT analysis on global competitiveness of machine tool industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(3), 251–258.
Shrestha, R. K., Alavalapati, J. R. R., & Kalmbacher, R. S. (2004). Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems, 81(3), 185–199.
Slyeptsov, A. I., & Sodenkamp, M. A. (2007). Decision making in complex systems. Kyjiv: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University.
Sodenkamp, M. A. (2005). Soft models of SWOT-analysis on the base of pairwise comparisons networks. Bulletin of Donetsk University, Series A: Natural sciences, 2, 375–380.
Tavana, M. (2006). A priority assessment multi-criteria decision model for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 1197–1215.
Tavana, M. (2004). A subjective assessment of alternative mission architectures for the human exploration of Mars at NASA using multicriteria decision making. Computers and Operations Research, 31, 1147–1164.
Tavana, M. (2002). Euclid: strategic alternative assessment matrix. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11, 75–96.
Tavana, M., & Banerjee, S. (1995). Strategic assessment model (SAM): a multiple criteria decision support system for evaluation of strategic alternatives. Decision Sciences, 26, 119–143.
Tavana, M., Bourgeois, B., & Sodenkamp, M. (2009). Fuzzy multiple criteria base realignment and closure (BRAC) benchmarking system at the department of defense. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(2), 192–222.
Tavana, M., & Sodenkamp, M. A. (2009). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy space center. Journal of the Operational Research Society. doi:10.1057/jors.2009.107, advance online publication.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Triantaphyllou, E., & Baig, K. (2005). The impact of aggregating benefit and cost criteria in four MCDA methods. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, 213–226.
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1–29.
Valentin, E. K. (2001). SWOT analysis from a resource-based view. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2), 54–68.
Valls, A., & Torra, V. (2000). Using classification as an aggregation tool in MCDM. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15(1), 159–168.
Van Leekwijk, W., & Kerre, E. E. (1999). Defuzzification: criteria and classification. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 108(2), 159–178.
Walters-York, M., & Curatola, A. P. (2000). Theoretical reflections on the use of students as surrogate subjects in behavioral experimentation. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 3, 243–263.
Wang, J., & Hwang, W.-L. (2007). A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega, 35, 247–257.
Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2002). On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 32(3), 289–304.
Zadeh, L. A. (1998). Roles of soft computing and fuzzy logic in the conception, design and deployment of information/intelligent systems. In Computational intelligence: soft computing and fuzzy-neuro integration with applications (pp. 1–9).
Zadeh, L. A. (1999). From computing with numbers to computing with words, from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 45(1), 105–119.
Zeleny, M. A. (1974). Concept of compromise solutions and the method of the disptaced ideal. Computers and Operations Research, 1(3–4), 479–496.
Zeleny, M. A. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2001). Multicriteria decision aid in uncertainty and financial risk management. In J. Gil-Aluja (Ed.), Handbook of management under uncertainty. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tavana, M., Sodenkamp, M.A. & Suhl, L. A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement. Ann Oper Res 181, 393–421 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0727-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0727-9