Abstract
The heuristic approach to decision-making holds that the selection process becomes more efficient when part of the information available is ignored. One element involved in selecting information is emotional valence. If emotional congruency is related to simplified decision-making strategies, then the interaction of this factor with task complexity should exist. The present study explored how factors of this nature influence decision-making efficiency. We hypothesized that emotional congruency would have a positive effect on task execution and that the magnitude of that effect would increase with greater task complexity because in that condition the amount of information to be processed is greater, meaning that a heuristic approach to the problem would be more efficient. We design a decision in browser decision-making task in which participants had to select emotional images to gain points. Depending on the correlation between emotional valence and in-task image value, we defined three emotional congruency conditions: direct, null, and inverse. Our results show that distinct types of emotional congruency have differential effects on behavior. While direct congruency-enhanced overall decision-making performance, inverse congruency interacted with task complexity to modify the pace at which task feedback affected behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguado L, Martínez-García N, Solís-Olce A, Dieguez-Risco T, Hinojosa JA (2018) Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands. Acta Physiol (oxf) 187:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.013
Aïte A, Borst G, Moutier S, Varescon I, Brown I, Houdé O, Cassotti M (2013) Impact of emotional context congruency on decision making under ambiguity. Emotion 13(2):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031345
Bland CE, Howe ML, Knott L (2016) Discrete emotion-congruent false memories in the DRM paradigm. Emotion 16(5):611–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000153
Buck L (1966) Reaction time as a measure of perceptual vigilance. Psychol Bull 65(5):291–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023207
Campbell DJ (1988) Task Complexity: a review and analysis. Acad Manag Rev 13(1):40–52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306775
Chikovani G, Babuadze L, Iashvili N, Gvalia T, Surguladze S (2015) Empathy costs: negative emotional bias in high empathisers. Psychiatry Res 229(1):340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.001
Choi E, Johnson DA, Moon K, Oah S (2018) Effects of positive and negative feedback sequence on work performance and emotional responses. J Organ Behav Manag 38(2–3):97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1423151
Coricelli G, Dolan RJ, Sirigu A (2007) Brain, emotion and decision making: the paradigmatic example of regret. Trends Cogn Sci 11(6):258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.003
Cortes PM, García-Hernández JP, Iribe-Burgos FA, Hernández-González M, Sotelo-Tapia C, Guevara MA (2021) Temporal division of the decision-making process: an EEG study. Brain Research 1769:147592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147592
Davis JI, Senghas A, Ochsner KN (2009) How does facial feedback modulate emotional experience? J Res Personal 43(5):822–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.06.005
DeShazo JR, Fermo G (2002) Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. J Environ Econ Manag 44(1):123–143. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1199
Dietrich C (2010) Decision making: factors that influence decision making, heuristics used, and decision outcomes. Inq uiries J 2(02):12
Gao C, Weber CE, Wedell DH, Shinkareva SV (2020) An fMRI study of affective congruence across visual and auditory modalities. J Cogn Neurosci 32(7):1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01553
Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 62(1):451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
Girz L, Driver-Linn E, Miller GA, Deldin PJ (2017) Evaluation of life events in major depression: assessing negative emotional bias. Clin Psychol Psychother 24(3):661–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2033
Greifeneder R, Scheibehenne B, Kleber N (2010) Less may be more when choosing is difficult: choice complexity and too much choice. Acta Physiol (oxf) 133(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.005
Gutnik LA, Hakimzada AF, Yoskowitz NA, Patel VL (2006) The role of emotion in decision-making: a cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior. J Biomed Inform 39(6):720–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2006.03.002
Heilman R, Crisan L, Houser D, Miclea M, Miu A (2010) Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion (Washington, D.C.) 10:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018489
Hu Y, Dolcos S (2017) Trait anxiety mediates the link between inferior frontal cortex volume and negative affective bias in healthy adults. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 12(5):775–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx008
Ito TA, Larsen JT, Smith NK, Cacioppo JT (1998) Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J Pers Soc Psychol 75(4):887–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887
Jeung H, Walther S, Korn CW, Bertsch K, Herpertz SC (2018) Emotional responses to receiving peer feedback on opinions in borderline personality disorder. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat 9(6):595–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000292
Juster FT, Stafford FP (1991) The allocation of time: empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. J Econ Lit 29(2):471–522
Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1997) International affective picture system (IAPS): technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Cent Study Emot Atten 1:39–58
Lea RG, Qualter P, Davis SK, Pérez-González J-C, Bangee M (2018) Trait emotional intelligence and attentional bias for positive emotion: an eye tracking study. Personality Individ Differ 128:88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.017
Madera-Carrillo H, Zarabozo D, Ruiz-Díaz M, Berriel-Saez P (2015) El sistema internacional de imágenes afectivas (IAPS) en población mexicana. Autoevaluación con maniquíes y etiquetas.[Reporte Técnico] Universidad de Guadalajara, pp 1–267
Mayer JD, McCormick LJ, Strong SE (1995) Mood-congruent memory and natural mood: new evidence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 21(7):736–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295217008
Newcombe MJ, Ashkanasy NM (2002) The role of affect and affective congruence in perceptions of leaders: an experimental study. Leadersh Q 13(5):601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00146-7
Niedenthal PM, Setterlund MB (1994) Emotion congruence in perception. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 20(4):401–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294204007
Pool E, Brosch T, Delplanque S, Sander D (2016) Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: a meta-analytic investigation. Psychol Bull 142(1):79–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000026
Quartz SR (2009) Reason, emotion and decision-making: risk and reward computation with feeling. Trends Cogn Sci 13(5):209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.003
Rampone G, Makin ADJ, Bertamini M (2014) Electrophysiological analysis of the affective congruence between pattern regularity and word valence. Neuropsychologia 58:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.005
Robinson P (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework. Appl Linguis 22(1):27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27
Robinson MD, Moeller SK, Fetterman AK (2010) Neuroticism and responsiveness to error feedback: adaptive self-regulation versus affective reactivity. J Pers 78(5):1469–1496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00658.x
Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, MacGregor DG (2005) Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychol 24(4Suppl):S35–S40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35
Smith SM, Petty RE (1995) Personality moderators of mood congruency effects on cognition: the role of self-esteem and negative mood regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol 68(6):1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1092
Song S, Zilverstand A, Song H, d’OleireUquillas F, Wang Y, Xie C, Cheng L, Zou Z (2017) The influence of emotional interference on cognitive control: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies using the emotional Stroop task. Sci Rep 7(1):2088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02266-2
Suedfeld P, Coren S (1992) Cognitive correlates of conceptual complexity. Personality Individ Differ 13(11):1193–1199
Taesler P, Jablonowski J, Fu Q, Rose M (2019) Modeling implicit learning in a cross-modal audio-visual serial reaction time task. Cogn Syst Res 54:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.002
Teroni F (2021) Emotions and memory. The Emotion Researcher, India
Tsiourti C, Weiss A, Wac K, Vincze M (2019) Multimodal Integration of emotional signals from voice, body, and context: effects of (In) congruence on emotion recognition and attitudes towards robots. Int J Soc Robot 11(4):555–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00524-z
Volokhov RN, Demaree HA (2010) Spontaneous emotion regulation to positive and negative stimuli. Brain Cogn 73(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.015
Wadlinger HA, Isaacowitz DM (2006) Positive mood broadens visual attention to positive stimuli. Motiv Emot 30(1):87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9021-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors agreed to submit the manuscript in this, its final form, and declare that the research was conducted with no commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Neuroscience (University of Guadalajara) and complied with the Helsinki Declaration and APA ethical standards.
Informed consent
All the participants gave their informed consent before testing.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Editor: Don Ross (University of Cape Town); Reviewers: Two researchers who prefer to remain anonymous.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cortes, P.M., García-Hernández, J.P., Iribe-Burgos, F.A. et al. Effects of emotional congruency and task complexity on decision-making. Cogn Process 24, 161–171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01129-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01129-1