Skip to main content
Log in

Mindfulness and decision making: sunk costs or escalation of commitment?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness is related to a number of positive health outcomes, such as decreased stress, anxiety and improved physical functioning. Recent studies have found that mindfulness is related to a range of cognitive outcomes, including better decision making. In one example, higher trait mindfulness and brief mindfulness inductions are associated with resistance to the influence of sunk costs, where mindful individuals were more willing to discontinue a costly, but disadvantageous, course of action. However, some previous studies examining mindfulness and sunk costs have methodological limitations which make it difficult to determine if mindfulness is specifically related to sensitivity to the sunk cost bias, or rather than to a general willingness to continue an unprofitable course of action (independent of the level of prior investment). The present study extends previous work by replicating the finding that trait mindfulness is positively related to resistance to the effects of sunk costs and also demonstrates that mindfulness is related to reduced escalation of commitment, an individual’s willingness to continue their commitment to an unprofitable course of action through the further investment of resources or time. Overall, trait mindfulness was most consistently related to reduced escalation of commitment, whereas the relationship between trait mindfulness and resistance to the effects of sunk costs was less consistently observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank A. Hafenbrack for his comments on an earlier draft of this article. This research was supported by Wabash College.

Funding

This study was funded by Wabash College.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Schmitzer-Torbert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Neil Schmitzer-Torbert declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling editor: Luca Simione (ISTC-CNR, Rome).

Reviewers: Antonino Esposito (Sapienza University of Rome), Andrew C. Hafenbrack (University of Washington).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 111 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitzer-Torbert, N. Mindfulness and decision making: sunk costs or escalation of commitment?. Cogn Process 21, 391–402 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00978-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00978-4

Keywords

Navigation