Abstract
Mindfulness is related to a number of positive health outcomes, such as decreased stress, anxiety and improved physical functioning. Recent studies have found that mindfulness is related to a range of cognitive outcomes, including better decision making. In one example, higher trait mindfulness and brief mindfulness inductions are associated with resistance to the influence of sunk costs, where mindful individuals were more willing to discontinue a costly, but disadvantageous, course of action. However, some previous studies examining mindfulness and sunk costs have methodological limitations which make it difficult to determine if mindfulness is specifically related to sensitivity to the sunk cost bias, or rather than to a general willingness to continue an unprofitable course of action (independent of the level of prior investment). The present study extends previous work by replicating the finding that trait mindfulness is positively related to resistance to the effects of sunk costs and also demonstrates that mindfulness is related to reduced escalation of commitment, an individual’s willingness to continue their commitment to an unprofitable course of action through the further investment of resources or time. Overall, trait mindfulness was most consistently related to reduced escalation of commitment, whereas the relationship between trait mindfulness and resistance to the effects of sunk costs was less consistently observed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anicha CL, Ode S, Moeller SK, Robinson MD (2012) Toward a cognitive view of trait mindfulness: distinct cognitive skills predict its observing and nonreactivity facets. J Pers 80(2):255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00722.x
Arch JJ, Craske MG (2010) Laboratory stressors in clinically anxious and non-anxious individuals: the moderating role of mindfulness. Behav Res Ther 48(6):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.02.005
Arkes HR, Blumer C (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 35(1):124–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4
Baer RA (2003) Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 10(2):125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bpg015
Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB (2004) Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment 11(3):191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029
Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L (2006) Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment 13(1):27–45
Boehne DM, Paese PW (2000) Deciding whether to complete or terminate an unfinished project: a strong test of the project completion hypothesis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 81(2):178–194. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2877
Bohlmeijer E, Prenger R, Taal E, Cuijpers P (2010) The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy on mental health of adults with a chronic medical disease: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 68(6):539–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.005
Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, Chichester
Bowlin SL, Baer RA (2012) Relationships between mindfulness, self-control, and psychological functioning. Pers Individ Differ 52(3):411–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.050
Brown KW, Ryan RM (2003) The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 84(4):822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
Bruine DB, Parker AM, Fischhoff B (2007) Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(5):938–956. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938
Crawley R (2015) Trait mindfulness and autobiographical memory specificity. Cogn Process 16(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0631-3
Garland H, Conlon DE (1998) Too close to quit: the role of project completion in maintaining commitment. J Appl Soc Psychol 28(22):2025–2048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01359.x
Giluk TL (2009) Mindfulness, big five personality, and affect: a meta-analysis. Pers Individ Differ 47(8):805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.026
Goh JX, Hall JA, Rosenthal R (2016) Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: some arguments on why and a primer on how mini meta-analysis. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 10(10):535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
Grossman P, Niemann L, Schmidt S, Walach H (2004) Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 57(1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00573-7
Hafenbrack AC, Vohs KD (2018) Mindfulness meditation impairs task motivation but not performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 147:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.05.001
Hafenbrack AC, Kinias Z, Barsade SG (2014) Debiasing the mind through meditation: mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychol Sci 25(2):369–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613503853
Lee JS, Keil M, Wong KFE (2018) Does a tired mind help avoid a decision bias? The effect of ego depletion on escalation of commitment. Appl Psychol Int Rev 67(1):171–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12109
Long EC, Christian MS (2015) Mindfulness buffers retaliatory responses to injustice: a regulatory approach. J Appl Psychol 100(5):1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000019
Molden DC, Hui CM (2011) Promoting de-escalation of commitment: a regulatory-focus perspective on sunk costs. Psychol Sci 22(1):8–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610390386
Ostafin BD, Kassman KT (2012) Stepping out of history: mindfulness improves insight problem solving. Conscious Cognit Int J 21(2):1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.014
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36(4):717–731
Raphiphatthana B, Jose P, Salmon K (2018) Does dispositional mindfulness predict the development of grit? J Individ Differ 39(2):76–87. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000252
Ruedy NE, Schweitzer ME (2010) In the moment: the effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making. J Bus Ethics 95:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0796-y
Schmitzer-Torbert NC (2014) Mindfulness and bias: more than sunk-costs. http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTk3. Accessed 1 Mar 2020
Sleesman DJ, Conlon DE, McNamara G, Miles JE (2012) Cleaning up the big muddy: a meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Acad Manag J 55(3):541–562. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0696
Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16(1):27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2
Staw BM (1981) The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad Manag Revi 6(4):577–587
Staw BM, Ross J (1980) Commitment in an experimenting society: a study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. J Appl Psychol 65(3):249–260
Strough J, Schlosnagle L, Karns T, Lemaster P, Pichayayothin N (2014) No time to waste: restricting life-span temporal horizons decreases the sunk-cost fallacy. J Behav Decis Mak 27(1):78–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1781
Wilson BM, Mickes L, Stolarz-Fantino S, Evrard M, Fantino E (2015) Increased false-memory susceptibility after mindfulness meditation. Psychol Sci 26(10):1567–1573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615593705
Wong KFE, Yik M, Kwong JYY (2006) Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: the role of negative affect. J Appl Psychol 91(2):282–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.282
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank A. Hafenbrack for his comments on an earlier draft of this article. This research was supported by Wabash College.
Funding
This study was funded by Wabash College.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Neil Schmitzer-Torbert declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handling editor: Luca Simione (ISTC-CNR, Rome).
Reviewers: Antonino Esposito (Sapienza University of Rome), Andrew C. Hafenbrack (University of Washington).
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitzer-Torbert, N. Mindfulness and decision making: sunk costs or escalation of commitment?. Cogn Process 21, 391–402 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00978-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00978-4