Abstract
Casadevante et al. (Curr Psychol 42: 4272–4285, 2023) used an objective test and found that regulation of response speed was related to better performance in a category learning task. The present study aims at analysing whether the relation between regulation of response speed and learning exists in an associative learning task. We developed ad hoc the Treasure Forest, an objective test consisting of a computerized associative learning task. We conducted a first study with 86 university students to assess the relation between spontaneous response speed and learning. Results showed that participants who acted slowly learned more than their mates who acted faster (t (83) = 8.898, p < .001, η2 = .672). Moreover, some students who began the task acting too fast to learn decreased their response speed by the second half of the task and simultaneously their learning index improved (t (11) = 2.325, p < .05, d = .721). Hence, self-regulating the response speed was linked to associative learning. We conducted a second study to analyse the influence of an external speed regulation on learning. The intervention group (N = 99) was prevented from clicking more than one click per second while the control group (N = 85) acted without restrictions. The intervention group achieved a higher learning index than the control group, who acted faster (t (160) = 4.828, p < .001, η2 =.117). Hence, regulating response speed promoted associative learning. We concluded that regulating response speed promoted associative learning, and we hypothesized that training self-regulation of response speed may improve learning and academic performance. Besides, we highlight the utility of employing objective test for analysing self-regulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (CC).
Change history
19 June 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00721-5
05 June 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00712-6
References
Casadevante, C., Romero, M., Fernández-Marcos, T., & Hernández, J. M. (2019). Category learning in schoolchildren. Its relation to age, academic marks and resolution patterns. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22, E48. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.56
Casadevante, C., Ortner, T., Romero, M., Hernández, J. M., & Santacreu, J. (2023). How to foster learning by limiting the response speed. Current Psychology, 42, 4272–4285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01784-7
Azevedo, R., & Gašević, D. (2019). Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.025
Bembenutty, H., & White, M. C. (2013). Academic performance and satisfaction with homework completion among college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.013
Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
Bernacki, M. L., Byrnes, J. P., & Cromley, J. G. (2012). The effects of achievement goals and self-regulated learning behaviors on reading comprehension in technology-enhanced learning environments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.12.001
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405
Cattell, R. B., & Kline, P. E. (1977). The scientific analysis of personality and motivation. Academic Press.
Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of school psychology, 47(5), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002
Crombach, M. J., Boekaerts, M., & Voeten, M. J. (2003). Online measurement of appraisals of students faced with curricular tasks. Educational and psychological measurement, 63(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402239319
DiBenedetto, M. K., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2010). Differences in self-regulatory processes among students studying science: A microanalytic investigation. International Journal of Educational & Psychological Assessment, 5, 1 https://www.academia.edu/20702300/Differences_in_Self_Regulatory_Processes_among_Students_Studying_Science_A_Microanalytic_Investigation
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational psychology review, 20(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
Dörrenbächer, L., & Perels, F. (2016). Self-regulated learning profiles in college students: Their relationship to achievement, personality, and the effectiveness of an intervention to foster self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.015
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological science, 16(12), 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Dryden Press.
Fan, Y., Lim, L., van der Graaf, J., Kilgour, J., Raković, M., Moore, J., Molenaar, I., Bannert, M., & Gašević, D. (2022). Improving the measurement of self-regulated learning using multi-channel data. Metacognition Learning, 17, 1025–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09304-z
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational psychologist, 45(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935
Greene, J. A., Robertson, J., & Costa, L. J. C. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using think-aloud methods. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 313–328). Routledge.
Guo, L. (2022). Using metacognitive prompts to enhance self‐regulated learning and learning outcomes: A meta‐analysis of experimental studies in computer‐based learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12650
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge.
Heirweg, S., De Smul, M., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2019). Profiling upper primary school students’ self-regulated learning through self-report questionnaires and think-aloud protocol analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.001
Jamieson-Noel, D., & Winne, P. H. (2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students’ studying and achievement. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1024//1010-0652.17.34.159
Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Jak, S., & Kester, L. (2019). Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292
Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1-2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.2190/AX2D-Y9VM-V7PX-0TAD
Khiat, H. (2022). Using automated time management enablers to improve self-regulated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787419866304
Li, Q., Baker, R., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Using clickstream data to measure, understand, and support self-regulated learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100727
Li, S., Huang, X., Wang, T., Pan, Z., & Lajoie, S. P. (2022). Examining the interplay between self-regulated learning activities and types of knowledge within a computer-simulated environment. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(3), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7571
Loeffler, S. N., Bohner, A., Stumpp, J., Limberger, M. F., & Gidion, G. (2019). Investigating and fostering self-regulated learning in higher education using interactive ambulatory assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 71, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.03.006
McDonald, J. D. (2008). Measuring personality constructs: The advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, informant reports and behavioural assessments. Enquire, 1(1), 1–19 https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/sociology/documents/enquire/volume-1-issue-1-dodorico-mcdonald.pdf
Musso, M. F., Boekaerts, M., Segers, M., & Cascallar, E. C. (2019). Individual differences in basic cognitive processes and self-regulated learning: Their interaction effects on math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 71, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.03.003
Niemivirta, M. (1998). Individual differences in motivational and cognitive factors affecting self-regulated learning: A pattern-oriented approach. In P. Nenniger, R. S. Jager, & M. Wosnitza (Eds.), Advances in motivation (pp. 23–42). Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
Núñez, J. C., Solano, P., González-Pienda, J. A., & Rosário, P. (2006). Evaluación de los procesos de autorregulación mediante autoinforme. Psicothema, 18(3), 353–358. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=72718304
Ortner, T. M., & Proyer, R. T. (2018). Behavioral and performance measures of personality. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1281-1
Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into practice, 41(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422–450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2019). Exploring autonomous learning capacity from a self-regulated learning perspective using learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 3138–3155. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12747
Pawlik, K. (1985). Cross-situational consistency behavior: Models, theories, and in-field tests of the consistency issue. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.), Measurement amd personality assessment (pp. 307–314). North Holland.
Perry, N., Phillips, L., & Dowler, J. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1854–1878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00408.x
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, School of Education.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 452–502). Academic Press.
Quiroga Estévez, M. A., Santacreu Mas, J., Montoro, A., Martínez-Molina, A., & Chun Shih, P. C. (2011). Evaluación informatizada de la atención para niños de 7 a 11 Años: El DiViSA-UAM y el TACI-UAM [Computerized assessment of attention for children from 7 to 11 years old: DiViSA-UAM and TACI-UAM]. Clínica y Salud, 22(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.5093/cl2011v22n1a1
Romero, M., Hernández, J. M., Juola, J. F., Casadevante, C., & Santacreu, J. (2019). Goal orientation test: An objective behavioral test. Psychological Reports, 123, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119845847
Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2
Saint, J., Fan, Y., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2022). Temporally-focused analytics of self-regulated learning: A systematic review of literature. Computers and education: Artificial intelligence, 2022, 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100060
Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Investigating prompts for supporting students’ self-regulation–A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches? The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791
Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777
Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2019). Using process mining to examine the sustainability of instructional support: How stable are the effects of metacognitive prompting on self-regulatory behavior? Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.003
Theobald, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976
Torrano Montalvo, F., & González Torres, M. (2004). Self-regulated learning: Current and future directions. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1), 1–34 http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/english/ContadorArticulo.php?27
Van Merriënboer, J. J., & de Bruin, A. B. (2019). Cue-based facilitation of self-regulated learning: A discussion of multidisciplinary innovations and technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.021
Veenman, M. V. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x
Veenman, M. V., Prins, F. J., & Verheij, J. (2003). Learning styles: Self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903322275885
Wang, Q., & Mousavi, A. (2023). Which log variables significantly predict academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 142–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13282
Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). H & H Publishing.
Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 15–32). Routledge.
Winne, P., & Azevedo, R. (2014). Metacognition. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 63–87). Cambridge University Press.
Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00006-1
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 531–566). Academic Press.
Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2021). College students’ time management: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1319–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z
Wong, J., Baars, M., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2021). Examining the use of prompts to facilitate self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106596
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–40). Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614
Acknowledgements
This paper and the research behind it would not have been possible without the exceptional support of the PSI+D team. We thank the PsInvestiga system of the Faculty of Psychology for the possibility of collecting the sample data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Ethics and Research Committee approved the study protocol. At the start of the study, the participants were just briefly informed about the study, avoiding biasing the results. They were told that the procedure aimed at assessing different competences. They signed an informed consent document to participate in the investigation. After the assessment, they were fully informed about the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Current themes of research:
Objective assessment of personality and individual differences
Objective assessment of learning and associated performance variables
Most relevant publications:
Casadevante, Cristina; Romero, Miriam; Fernández-Marcos, Tatiana; & Hernández, José Manuel. (2019) Category learning in schoolchildren. Its relation to age, academic marks and resolution patterns. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22, e48. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.56
Casadevante, Cristina; Ortner, Tuulia; Romero, Miriam; Hernández, José Manuel & Santacreu, José. (2021). How to foster learning by limiting the response speed. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01784-7
Romero, M.; Hernández, J.M.; Juola, J.F.; Casadevante, C.; & Santacreu; J. (2019). Goal orientation test: An objective behavioral test. Psychological Reports, 123(4), 1425-1451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119845847
Romero, M.; Hernández, J.M.; Juola, J. F. , Casadevante, C.; & Santacreu, J. (2021). A complementary methodology to assess time management behaviors. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01578-x
Romero, Miriam; Casadevante, Cristina; & Montoro, Helena. (2020). Cómo construir un chatbot psicólogo. Papeles del Psicólogo / Psychologist Papers, 41(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2920
Casadevante, Cristina; Romero, Miriam; Fernández-Marcos, Tatiana; & Hernández, José Manuel. (2019). Category learning in schoolchildren. Its relation to age, academic marks and resolution patterns. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22, e48. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.56
Romero, M., Hernández, J. M., Juola, J. F., Casadevante, C., & Santacreu, J. (2019). Goal orientation test: An objective behavioral test. Psychological Reports, 123(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119845847
Fernández-Marcos, T., de la Fuente Casadevante, C., Santacreu, J. (2017). Test–retest reliability and convergent validity of attention measures. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 25(5), 464-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1329145
The original online version of this article was revised: A data was inadvertently added in the title of the paper.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Casadevante, C., Romero, M., Fernández-Marcos, T. et al. Regulating Response Speed Promotes Associative Learning. Eur J Psychol Educ 39, 557–576 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00707-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00707-3