Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clival chordoma: a single-centre outcome analysis

  • Original Article - Brain Tumors
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The treatment of clival chordomas remains challenging. Total tumour resection is often impossible without hampering adjacent anatomical structures and causing functional sequelae. On the other hand, chordomas show limited response to non-surgical treatment modalities. Up to now, no well-established interdisciplinary treatment algorithms for clival chordomas exist. In this regard, we analysed the data from all patients that underwent interdisciplinary treatment for clival chordoma in our institution over the last 10 years.

Method

Retrospective report of all patients treated at the authors’ institution from 2005 to 2015.

Results

Thirteen patients underwent 24 surgeries, of which 2 (8%) were gross total resections and 22 (92%) incomplete resections. Neurological deterioration, endocrinological disturbances and other surgical complications were observed in six (25%), three (13%) and nine (38%) cases, respectively. Three surgeries (13%) led to an improvement of the initial preoperative neurological condition. All patients were discussed on the interdisciplinary tumour board and all underwent one type of radiotherapy following initial surgery: proton beam in 11 cases (85%) and photon beam in two (15%) cases. In the course of their recurrent disease, three patients (23%) received systemic therapy (imatinib, pazopanib and nivolumab). One patient received a personalised cellular immunotherapy. One patient (8%) was lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 12 patients, four patients (33%) died in the period of analysis; all deaths were chordoma-related. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was 83% (52–97%, CI 95%), 5-year progression-free survival rate was 53% (26-79%, CI 95%). The eight patients (66%) still alive had favourable outcome (KPS, 90 ± 10.7%). SF36 analysis among the survivors revealed 43 points for the Physical Component Summary (12% above, 38% at and 50% below the general population norm) and 47 points for the Mental Component Summary (25% above, 38% at and 38% below).

Conclusions

Our patients show a low rate of gross total resection but an outcome well comparable to other published results. This emphasises the importance of interdispiplinary treatment strategies, with surgery supplying maximal safe resection and avoiding severe neurological deficit, allowing patients to undergo adjusted radiotherapy and other treatment options in a good condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almefty K, Pravdenkova S, Colli BO, Al-Mefty O, Gokden M (2007) Chordoma and chondrosarcoma: similar, but quite different, skull base tumors. Cancer 110:2457–2467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin-Seymour M, Munzenrider J, Goitein M, Verhey L, Urie M, Gentry R, Birnbaum S, Ruotolo D, McManus P, Skates S et al (1989) Fractionated proton radiation therapy of chordoma and low-grade chondrosarcoma of the base of the skull. J Neurosurg 70:13–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azzarelli A, Quagliuolo V, Cerasoli S, Zucali R, Bignami P, Mazzaferro V, Dossena G, Gennari L (1988) Chordoma: natural history and treatment results in 33 cases. J Surg Oncol 37:185–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bompas E, Le Cesne A, Tresch-Bruneel E, Lebellec L, Laurence V, Collard O, Saada-Bouzid E, Isambert N, Blay JY, Amela EY, Salas S, Chevreau C, Bertucci F, Italiano A, Clisant S, Penel N (2015) Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic chordomas: a phase II trial of the French sarcoma group (GSF/GETO). Ann Oncol 26:2168–2173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brada M, Pijls-Johannesma M, De Ruysscher D (2007) Proton therapy in clinical practice: current clinical evidence. J Clin Oncol 25:965–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Maio S, Temkin N, Ramanathan D, Sekhar LN (2011) Current comprehensive management of cranial base chordomas: 10-year meta-analysis of observational studies. J Neurosurg 115:1094–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferraresi V, Nuzzo C, Zoccali C, Marandino F, Vidiri A, Salducca N, Zeuli M, Giannarelli D, Cognetti F, Biagini R (2010) Chordoma: clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of a case series of 25 patients. BMC Cancer 10:22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2010) Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 112:1061–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hindi N, Casali PG, Morosi C, Messina A, Palassini E, Pilotti S, Tamborini E, Radaelli S, Gronchi A, Stacchiotti S (2015) Imatinib in advanced chordoma: a retrospective case series analysis. Eur J Cancer 51:2609–2614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito E, Saito K, Okada T, Nagatani T, Nagasaka T (2010) Long-term control of clival chordoma with initial aggressive surgical resection and gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrence. Acta Neurochir 152:57–67 discussion 67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen AD, Nikoghosyan A, Ellerbrock M, Ecker S, Debus J, Munter MW (2011) Re-irradiation with scanned charged particle beams in recurrent tumours of the head and neck: acute toxicity and feasibility. Radiother Oncol 101:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaiser TE, Pritchard DJ, Unni KK (1984) Clinicopathologic study of sacrococcygeal chordoma. Cancer 53:2574–2578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipplaa A, Dijkstra S, Gelderblom H (2016) Efficacy of pazopanib and sunitinib in advanced axial chordoma: a single reference centre case series. Clin Sarcoma Res 6:19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. McMaster ML, Goldstein AM, Bromley CM, Ishibe N, Parry DM (2001) Chordoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973-1995. Cancer Causes Control 12:1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Migliorini DVR, Belkouch MC, Luy P, Blaser S (2015) First in man, phase 1 clinical trial combining encapsulation cell technology and irradiated autologous tumor cells for personalized cell-based immunotherapy. Safety, feasibility and clinical outcome results. Eur J Cancer 51:S114–S114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Potluri S, Jefferies SJ, Jena R, Harris F, Burton KE, Prevost AT, Burnet NG (2011) Residual postoperative tumour volume predicts outcome after high-dose radiotherapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base and spine. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 23:199–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Samii A, Gerganov VM, Herold C, Hayashi N, Naka T, Mirzayan MJ, Ostertag H, Samii M (2007) Chordomas of the skull base: surgical management and outcome. J Neurosurg 107:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stacchiotti S, Longhi A, Ferraresi V, Grignani G, Comandone A, Stupp R, Bertuzzi A, Tamborini E, Pilotti S, Messina A, Spreafico C, Gronchi A, Amore P, Vinaccia V, Casali PG (2012) Phase II study of imatinib in advanced chordoma. J Clin Oncol 30:914–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stuer C, Schramm J, Schaller C (2006) Skull base chordomas: management and results. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 46:118–124 discussion 124-115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Suit H, Kooy H, Trofimov A, Farr J, Munzenrider J, DeLaney T, Loeffler J, Clasie B, Safai S, Paganetti H (2008) Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? No. Radiother Oncol 86:148–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamaki M, Aoyagi M, Kuroiwa T, Yamamoto M, Kishimoto S, Ohno K (2007) Clinical course and autopsy findings of a patient with clival chordoma who underwent multiple surgeries and radiation during a 10-year period. Skull Base 17:331–340

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tzortzidis F, Elahi F, Wright D, Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN (2006) Patient outcome at long-term follow-up after aggressive microsurgical resection of cranial base chordomas. Neurosurgery 59:230–237 discussion 230-237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Mohyeldin A, Coumans JV, Kahle KT, Ferreira MJ (2012) Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol 13:e69–e76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Jägersberg.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this retrospective type of study formal consent is not required.

Disclosures

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jägersberg, M., El Rahal, A., Dammann, P. et al. Clival chordoma: a single-centre outcome analysis. Acta Neurochir 159, 1815–1823 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3163-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3163-7

Keywords

Navigation