Skip to main content
Log in

Source identification for mobile devices, based on wavelet transforms combined with sensor imperfections

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most relevant applications of digital image forensics is to accurately identify the device used for taking a given set of images, a problem called source identification. This paper studies recent developments in the field and proposes the mixture of two techniques (Sensor Imperfections and Wavelet Transforms) to get better source identification of images generated with mobile devices. Our results show that Sensor Imperfections and Wavelet Transforms can jointly serve as good forensic features to help trace the source camera of images produced by mobile phones. Furthermore, the model proposed here can also determine with high precision both the brand and model of the device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayram S, Sencar HT, Memon N (2008) Classification of digital camera-models based on demosaicing artifacts. Digit Investig 5(1–2):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boutell M, Luo, J (2004) Photo classification by integrating image content and camera metadata. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on pattern recognition, vol 4. IEEE Computer Society, pp 901–904. doi: 10.1109/ICPR.2004.1333918

  3. Boutell M, Luo J (2005) Beyond pixels: exploiting camera metadata for photo classification. Pattern Recogn 38(6):935–946. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2004.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Celiktutan O, Avcibas I, Sankur B, Ayerden NP, Capar C (2006) Source cell-phone identification. In: 2006 IEEE 14th signal processing and communications applications, pp 1–3. doi: 10.1109/SIU.2006.1659882

  5. Chang C, Lin C (2001) LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. Tech. rep. Software available at: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm

  6. Do MN, Vetterli M (2005) The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(12):2091–2106

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Geradts ZJ, Bijhold J, Kieft M, Kurosawa K, Kuroki K, Saitoh N (2001) Methods for identification of images acquired with digital cameras. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, vol 4232. Spie, pp 505–512. doi: 10.1117/12.417569

  8. Khannaa N, Mikkilinenib AK, Chiub GT, Allebacha JP, Delpa EJ (2006) Forensic classification of imaging sensor types. In: Rfc. Purdue University, USA

  9. Luka J, Fridrich J, Goljan M (2006) Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Security 1(2):205–214. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2006.873602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mckay C, Swaminathan A, Gou H, Wu M (2008) Image acquisition forensics: forensic analysis to identify imaging source. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics speech and, signal processing, pp 1657–1660. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4517945

  11. Meng FJ, Kong XW, You XG (2008) Source camera identification based on image bi-coherence and wavelet features. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual IFIP WG 11.9 international conference on digital forensics. Kyoto, Japan

  12. Ozparlak L, Avcibas I (2011) Differentiating between images using wavelet-based transforms: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Security 6(4):1418–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pudil P, Novovičová J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recogn Lett 15(11):1119–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Randen T, Husøy JH (1999) Filtering for texture classification: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21(4):291–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baer R (2010) Resolution limits in digital photography: the looming end of the pixel wars - OSA technical digest (CD). In: Proceedings of the imaging systems. Optical Society of America, p ITuB3

  16. Romero NL, Chornet VG, Cobos JS, Carot AS, Centellas FC, Mendez MC (2008) Recovery of descriptive information in images from digital libraries by means of EXIF metadata. Library Hi Tech 26(2):302–315. doi:10.1108/07378830810880388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tesic J (2005) Metadata practices for consumer photos. IEEE Multimed 12(3):86–92. doi:10.1109/MMUL.2005.50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsai MJ, Lai CL, Liu J (2007) Camera/mobile phone source identification for digital forensics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics speech and signal processing ICASSP 07, pp II-221-II-224

  19. Van Lanh T, Chong KS, Emmanuel S, Kankanhalli MS (2007) A survey on digital camera image forensic methods. IEEE Int Conf Multimed Expo 2007:16–19. doi:10.1109/ICME.2007.4284575

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang B, Guo Y, Kong X, Meng F (2009) Source camera identification forensics based on wavelet features. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent information hiding and multimedia signal processing, vol 0. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 702–705

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID, Spain) through Acción Integrada MAEC-AECID MEDITERRÁNEO A1/037528/11.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. J. García Villalba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandoval Orozco, A.L., Arenas González, D.M., Rosales Corripio, J. et al. Source identification for mobile devices, based on wavelet transforms combined with sensor imperfections. Computing 96, 829–841 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-013-0313-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-013-0313-5

Keywords

Navigation