Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification and location of label retaining cells in mouse liver

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In most somatic tissues, adult stem cells are crucial for the maintenance of tissue homeostasis under normal physiological states and during recovery from injuries. Label retaining cell (LRC) assay remains the well-known method to identify possible somatic stem/progenitor cells and their location both in situ and in vivo.

Methods

Here, BrdU was used to tag the possible hepatic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) in newborn pups, followed by a trace period of up to 23 months. Additionally, we report a method to rapidly kill proliferating cells in adult liver tissue, and activate and label (KAL) surviving possible HSPCs.

Results

We found that LRCs definitively exist in the liver tissues of adult mice, that LRCs express cell cycle proteins cyclind3 and cdk6, but do not express sca-1 or c-kit, and that LRCs locate primarily in the periportal and pericentral regions. Moreover, the number of these LRCs remains nearly constant during the lifespan of the mice. After injury induced by 5-fluorouracil, we observed that the activation of possible HSPCs tagged by the BrdU label was almost completely inhibited at day 4. The cellular kinetics of repair of BrdU-tagged HSPCs were different every 12 h between day 3 and day 4. Moreover, HSPCs still retained labels and located definitively in the periportal region after a prolonged chase.

Conclusions

The LRC method together with our novel KAL method reported here may be used to identify and locate possible HSPCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASCs:

Adult stem cells

LRCs:

Label retaining cells

HSCs/HPCs:

Hepatic stem/progenitor cells

NPC:

Non-parenchymal cell (s)

5-Fu:

5-Fluorouracil

Ck:

Cytokeratin

Sca-1:

Stem cell antigen-1

BrdU:

5-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine

DAPI:

4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

References

  1. Michalopoulos GK, DeFrances MC. Liver regeneration. Science. 1997;276:60–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sell S. Heterogeneity and plasticity of hepatocyte lineage cells. Hepatology. 2001;33:738–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon GJ, Coleman WB, Hixson DC, et al. Liver regeneration in rats with retrorsine-induced hepatocellular injury proceeds through a novel cellular response. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:607–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li WL, Su J, Yao YC, et al. Isolation and characterization of bipotent liver progenitor cells from adult mouse. Stem Cells. 2006;24:322–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Azuma H, Hirose T, Fujii H, et al. Enrichment of hepatic progenitor cells from adult mouse liver. Hepatology. 2003;37:1385–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Clark JB, Rhee GS, et al. Proliferation and hepatic differentiation of adult-derived progenitor cells. Cells Tissues Organs. 2003;173:193–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright N, Samuelson L, Walkup MH, et al. Enrichment of a bipotent hepatic progenitor cell from naive adult liver tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;366:367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujikawa T, Hirose T, Fujii H, et al. Purification of adult hepatic progenitor cells using green fluorescent protein (GFP)-transgenic mice and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. J Hepatol. 2003;39:162–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore KA, Lemischka IR. Stem cells and their niches. Science. 2006;311:1880–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomès D, Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:677–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bickenbach JR. Identification and behavior of label-retaining cells in oral mucosa and skin. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1611–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duvillié B, Attali M, Aiello V, et al. Label-retaining cells in the rat pancreas: location and differentiation potential in vitro. Diabetes. 2003;52:2035–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith GH. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development. 2005;132:681–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan RW, Gargett CE. Identification of label-retaining cells in mouse endometrium. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1529–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oliver JA, Maarouf O, Cheema FH, et al. The renal papilla is a niche for adult kidney stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:795–804.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Urbanek K, Cesselli D, Rota M, et al. Stem cell niches in the adult mouse heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9226–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JH, Ilic Z, Sell S. Cell kinetics of repair after allyl alcohol-induced liver necrosis in mice. Int J Exp Pathol. 1996;77:63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hodgson GS, Bradley TR. Properties of haematopoietic stem cells surviving 5-fluorouracil treatment: evidence for a pre-CFU-S cell? Nature. 1979;281:381–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McNiece I, Andrews R, Stewart M, et al. Action of interleukin-3, G-CSF, and GM-CSF on highly enriched human hematopoietic progenitor cells: synergistic interaction of GM-CSF plus G-CSF. Blood. 1989;74:110–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Zant G. Studies of hematopoietic stem cells spared by 5-fluorouracil. J Exp Med. 1984;159:679–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart FM, Temeles D, Lowry P, et al. Post-5-fluorouracil human marrow: stem cell characteristics and renewal properties after autologous marrow transplantation. Blood. 1993;81:2283–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Braun KM, Niemann C, Jensen UB, et al. Manipulation of stem cell proliferation and lineage commitment: visualisation of label-retaining cells in wholemounts of mouse epidermis. Development. 2003;130:5241–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sell S. Electron microscopic identification of putative liver stem cells and intermediate hepatocytes following periportal necrosis induced in rats by allyl alcohol. Stem Cells. 1997;15:378–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Petersen BE, Zajac VF, Michalopoulos GK. Hepatic oval cell activation in response to injury following chemically induced periportal or pericentral damage in rats. Hepatology. 1998;27:1030–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Evarts RP, Hu Z, Fujio K, et al. Activation of hepatic stem cell compartment in the rat: role of transforming growth factor alpha, hepatocyte growth factor, and acidic fibroblast growth factor in early proliferation. Cell Growth Differ. 1993;4:555–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature. 1975;255:197–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rando TA. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction. Cell. 2007;129:1239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kubota Y, Takubo K, Suda T. Bone marrow long label-retaining cells reside in the sinusoidal hypoxic niche. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;366:335–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kiel MJ, He S, Ashkenazi R, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU. Nature. 2007;449:238–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lansdorp PM. Immortal strands? Give me a break. Cell. 2007;129:1244–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kotton DN, Fabian AJ, Mulligan RC. A novel stem-cell population in adult liver with potent hematopoietic-reconstitution activity. Blood. 2005;106:1574–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hussain SZ, Strom SC, Kirby MR, et al. Side population cells derived from adult human liver generate hepatocyte-like cells in vitro. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1755–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Karpowicz P, Morshead C, Kam A, et al. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:721–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagasue N, Kobayashi M, Iwaki A, et al. Effect of 5-fluorouracil on liver regeneration and metabolism after partial hepatectomy in the rat. Cancer. 1978;41:435–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Theise ND, Saxena R, Portmann BC, et al. The canals of Hering and hepatic stem cells in humans. Hepatology. 1999;30:1425–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paku S, Schnur J, Nagy P, et al. Origin and structural evolution of the early proliferating oval cells in rat liver. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1313–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks go to Xuedong Wang (Institute of Biochemistry, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University) for help in the use of the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope. This work was greatly supported by the National Support Program for Science and Technology (No. 2006BAI01B04), by the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 30740015), and by a grant for key projects from the Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation (No. Y205449).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fusheng Li.

Additional information

F. Li and L. Lu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, F., Lu, L. & Lu, J. Identification and location of label retaining cells in mouse liver. J Gastroenterol 45, 113–121 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-009-0139-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-009-0139-2

Keywords

Navigation