Skip to main content
Log in

A machine learning approach for cost prediction analysis in environmental governance engineering

  • Machine Learning - Applications & Techniques in Cyber Intelligence
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current model design for environmental governance cost prediction is too simple, it is difficult to obtain the ideal prediction accuracy, and it has the disadvantages of slow convergence. Based on this, this study combines the particle swarm optimization algorithm to improve the support vector machine and proposes a machine learning method based on particle swarm optimization support vector machine. Through the analysis of the machine learning process and the actual project of environmental governance, this study constructs a scientific predictive index system, proposes a predictive model based on particle swarm optimization parameters, and uses system clustering analysis to classify similar sample data. At the same time, this study compares the performance of BP neural network model-based prediction model, LSSVM model-based prediction model, and PSO-LSSVM model-based prediction model. The research indicates that the prediction model based on PSO optimization LSSVM has a good guiding significance for the cost prediction of environmental governance engineering, and is more suitable for the prediction of the pre-cost of environmental governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robert C (2014) Machine learning, a probabilistic perspective. Chance 27(2):62–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen T, Du Z, Sun N et al (2014) DianNao: a small-footprint high-throughput accelerator for ubiquitous machine-learning. Acm Sigplan Notices 49(4):269–284

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nickel M, Murphy K, Tresp V et al (2015) A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. Proc IEEE 104(1):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buczak AL, Guven E (2017) A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 18(2):1153–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pillonetto G, Dinuzzo F, Chen T et al (2014) Kernel methods in system identification, machine learning and function estimation: a survey ☆. Automatica 50(3):657–682

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Libbrecht MW, Noble WS (2016) Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet 16(6):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanschoren J, Rijn JNV, Bischl B et al (2014) OpenML: networked science in machine learning. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 15(2):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stratigopoulos HG, Makris Y (2015) Error moderation in low-cost machine-learning-based analog/RF testing. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 27(2):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sidorov G, Velasquez F, Stamatatos E et al (2014) Syntactic N-grams as machine learning features for natural language processing. Expert Syst Appl 41(3):853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giusti A, Guzzi J, Dan CC et al (2017) A machine learning approach to visual perception of forest trails for mobile robots. IEEE Robotics Autom Lett 1(2):661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasan S, Shamsuddin SM, Lopes N (2014) Machine learning big data framework and analytics for big data problems. Int J Adv Soft Comput Appl 6(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xing EP, Ho Q, Dai W et al (2015) Petuum: a new platform for distributed machine learning on big data. IEEE Trans Big Data 1(2):49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shan S (2014) Big data classification: problems and challenges in network intrusion prediction with machine learning. Acm Sigmetr Perform Eval Rev 41(4):70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ (2016) Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 375(13):1216–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Landset S, Khoshgoftaar TM, Richter AN et al (2015) A survey of open source tools for machine learning with big data in the Hadoop ecosystem. J Big Data 2(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71773032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Ai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ai, D., Yang, J. A machine learning approach for cost prediction analysis in environmental governance engineering. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 8195–8203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3860-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3860-z

Keywords

Navigation