Skip to main content
Log in

Zu viele Schmerzzeitschriften und zu wenig Gutachter

Too many pain journals and too few reviewers

  • Leserbriefe
  • Published:
Der Schmerz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Junker C, Egger M, Schneider M, Zellweger T, Antes G (1996) The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:1876–1877 (author reply 1877)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eysenbach G (2004) Improving the quality of web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E‑Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 6:e34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Radbruch.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

L. Radbruch und H.-G. Schaible geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radbruch, L., Schaible, HG. Zu viele Schmerzzeitschriften und zu wenig Gutachter. Schmerz 31, 405–406 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-017-0224-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-017-0224-z

Navigation