Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coupling annual, monthly and daily weather generators to simulate multisite and multivariate climate variables with low-frequency variability for hydrological modelling

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weather generators are usually used to produce an ensemble of climate time series for vulnerability assessments and impact studies in hydrological and agricultural communities. Multisite and multivariate weather generators (MMWGs) have many advantages over single-site counterparts in terms of coupling with distributed models for the assessment of spatial variability in various impact sectors. However, the existing MMWGs usually suffer from limitations in preserving multisite and multivariate dependencies at multiple time scales, as well as preserving the low-frequency variability of climate variables. This study proposes a new MMWG which preserves low-frequency climate variability by coupling annual, monthly and daily weather generators into a single model. Specifically, the daily precipitation and temperature time series generated by a widely used multisite daily weather generator is adjusted using monthly and annual climate time series generated by a first-order linear autoregressive model. This combination preserves the multisite and multivariate attributes, as well as low-frequency variability at monthly and annual scales. The performance of the proposed MMWG was evaluated by comparing the baseline model against that of its variants with monthly or annual adjustments for climate generation. The performance was also assessed using a hydrological model over two watersheds with different hydroclimatic characteristics. The results show that the proposed weather generator performs well with respect to reproducing the marginal distributional attributes, multisite and multivariate dependencies, and climate variability at the daily, monthly and annual scales. Weather generators with either monthly or annual adjustments (and not both) only improve the simulations in multisite and multivariate dependencies and low-frequency variability at the corresponding time scales. In terms of hydrological modeling, the proposed model consistently performs better than the baseline model and its variants with only monthly or annual adjustments in representing the mean and variance of monthly and annual streamflows. It also performs better in representing the frequency distribution of mean and extreme streamflow events. Overall, the proposed MMWG can effectively produce multisite and multivariate climate time series with low-frequency variability and has a strong potential for use in climate change impact studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour KC, Johnson CA, van Genuchtenb MTh (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J 3:1340–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apipattanavis S, Podesta G, Rajagopalan B, Katz RW (2007) A semiparametric multivariate and multisite weather generator. Water Resour Res 43(11):W11401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS et al (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development. Jawra J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault R, Malo JS, Brissette F, Minville M, Leconte R (2013) Structural and non-structural climate change adaptation strategies for the Péribonka water resource system. Water Resour Manag 27(7):2075–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault R, Poulin A, Côté P, Brissette F (2014) A comparison of stochastic optimization algorithms in hydrological model calibration. J Hydrol Eng 19(7):1374–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault R, Latraverse M, Duchesne T (2016) An efficient method to correct under-dispersion in ensemble streamflow prediction for seasonal volumetric forecasting. Water Resour Manage 30(12):4363–4380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breinl K, Turkington T, Stowasser M (2013) Stochastic generation of multi-site daily precipitation for applications in risk management. J Hydrol 498:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brissette FP, Khalili M, Leconte R (2007) Efficient stochastic generation of multi-site synthetic precipitation data. J Hydrol 345(3–4):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buishand TA, Brandsma T (2001) Multisite simulation of daily precipitation and temperature in the Rhine basin by nearest-neighbor resampling. Water Resour Res 37(11):2761–2776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton A, Kilsby CG, Fowler HJ, Cowpertwait PSP, O’Connell PE (2008a) RainSim: a spatial-temporal stochastic rainfall modelling system. Environ Model Software 23(12):1356–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton A, Kilsby CG, Fowler HJ, Cowpertwait PSP, O’Connell PE (2008b) RainSim: a spatial–temporal stochastic rainfall modelling system. Environ Model Software 23(12):1356–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon A (2008) Probabilistic multisite precipitation downscaling by an expanded Bernoulli–Gamma density network. J Hydrometeorol 9(6):1284–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau R, Fortin J-P, Morin G (1977) The CEQUEAU model: description and examples of its use in problems related to water resource management/Le modèle CEQUEAU: Description et exemples d’utilisation dans le cadre de problèmes reliés à l’aménagement. Hydrol Sci Bull 22(1):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP (2015) Combining stochastic weather generation and ensemble weather forecast for short term streamflow prediction. Water Resour Manag 29:3329–3342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Zhang X, Liu W, Li Z (2009) Evaluating and extending CLIGEN precipitation generation for the Loess Plateau of China. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(2):378–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2010) A daily stochastic weather generator for preserving low-frequency of climate variability. J Hydrol 388(3):480–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2011) Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology. J Hydrol 401:190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2012a) Downscaling of weather generator parameters to quantify the hydrological impacts of climate change. Clim Res 51(3):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R, Caron A (2012b) A versatile weather generator for daily precipitation and temperature. Tran ASABE 55(3):895–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Li Z (2014a) Post-processing of ensemble weather forecasts using a stochastic weather generator. Mon Weather Rev 142:1106–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Zhang X (2014b) A multi-site stochastic weather generator for daily precipitation and temperature. Tran ASABE 57(5):1375–1391

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Chen H, Guo S (2018a) Multi-site precipitation downscaling using a stochastic weather generator. Clim Dyn 50(5–6):1975–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Li C, Brissette FP, Chen H, Wang M, Essou GRC (2018b) Impacts of correcting the inter-variable correlation of climate model outputs on hydrological modeling. J Hydrol 560:326–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Rui H, Zuo T, Li Q, Zheng D, Chen A, Xu Y, Xu C-Y (2013) Hydrological simulation by SWAT model with fixed and varied parameterization approaches under land use change. Water Resour Manag 27(8):2823–2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubrovsky M, Buchteke J, Zalud Z (2004) High-frequency and low-frequency variability in stochastic daily weather generator and its effect on agricultural and hydrologic modeling. Clim Change 63:145–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evin G, Favre AC, Hingray B (2018) Stochastic generation of multi-site daily precipitation focusing on extreme events. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:655–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HJ, Kilsby CG, O’Connell PE, Burton A (2005) A weather-type conditioned multi-site stochastic rainfall model for the generation of scenarios of climatic variability and change. J Hydrol 308(1–4):50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • François B, Hingray B, Hendrickx F, Creutin JD (2014) Seasonal patterns of water storage as signatures of the climatological equilibrium between resource and demand. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18(9):3787–3800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JW, Mavromatis T (2001) Correcting low-frequency variability bias in stochastic weather generators. Agr Forest Meteorol 109:297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson CL, Cumming KA, Woolhiser DA, Richardson CW (1994) Microcomputer program for daily weather simulations in the contiguous United States. Publ. ARS-114. USDA-ARS, Washington D.C.

  • Harris CNP, Quinn AD, Bridgeman J (2014) The use of probabilistic weather generator information for climate change adaptation in the UK water sector. Meteorol Appl 21(2):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higham NJ (1988) Computing a nearest symmetric positive semidefinite matrix. Linear Algebra Appl 103:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Conover WJ (1982) A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Commun Stat Simul Comput 11(3):311–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GL, Daly C, Taylor GH, Hanson CL (1999) Spatial variability and interpolation of stochastic weather simulation model parameters. J Appl Meteor 39(6):778–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili M, Leconte R, Brissette F (2007) Stochastic multisite generation of daily precipitation data using spatial autocorrelation. J Hydrometeorol 8(3):396–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King LM, McLeod AI, Simonovic SP (2014) Simulation of historical temperatures using a multi-site, multivariate block resampling algorithm with perturbation. Hydrol Process 28(3):905–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King LM, Mcleod AI, Simonovic SP (2015) Improved weather generator algorithm for multisite simulation of precipitation and temperature. J Am Water Resour Assoc 51(5):1305–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall U, Sharma A (1996) A nearest neighbour bootstrap for resampling hydrologic time series. Water Resour Res 32(3):679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leander R, Buishand TA (2009) A daily weather generator based on a two-stage resampling algorithm. J Hydrol 374(3–4):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (2014) A new framework for multi-site weather generator: a two-stage model combining a parametric method with a distribution-free shuffle procedure. Clim Dyn 43(3–4):657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Babovic V (2018) A new scheme for multivariate, multisite weather generator with inter-variable, inter-site dependence and inter-annual variability based on empirical copula approach. Clim Dyn 5:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4249-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Jin J (2017) Evaluating climate change impacts on streamflow variability based on a multisite multivariate GCM downscaling method in the Jing River of China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:5531–5546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Sinha E, Horton DE, Diffenbaugh NS, Michalak AM (2014) Joint bias correction of temperature and precipitation in climate model simulations. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(23):13153–13162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Lü Z, Li J, Shi X (2017a) Links between the spatial structure of weather generator and hydrological modeling. Theor Appl Climatol 128(1):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Shi X, Li J (2017b) Multisite and multivariate GCM downscaling using a distribution-free shuffle procedure for correlation reconstruction. Clim Res 72:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust HW, Sauter T, Theme M, Venema VKC, Chun KP, Goodess CM, Jones RG, Onof C, Vrac M, Thiele-Eich I (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change: recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys 48(3):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason SJ (2004) Simulating climate over Western North America using stochastic weather generators. Clim Change 62(1–3):155–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matalas NC (1967) Mathematical assessment of synthetic hydrology. Water Resour Res 3:937–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra R, Sharma A (2007) A semi-parametric model for stochastic generation of multi-site daily rainfall exhibiting low-frequency variability. J Hydrol 335(1–2):180–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin G, Fortin JP, Charbonneau R (1975) Utilisation du modèle hydrophysiographique CEQUEAU pour l’exploitation des reservoirs artificiels.” IAHS Publication No. 115, IAHS Press, Wallingford, U.K., pp 176–184 (in French)

  • Nicks AD, Lane LJ (1989) Weather generator. In: Lane LJ, Nearing MA (eds) USDA water erosion prediction project. NSERL Report No. 2. West Lafayette, Ind.: USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory

  • Nicks AD, Lane LJ, Gander GA (1995) Chapter 2: Weather generator. In: Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (eds) USDA water erosion prediction project: hillslope profile and watershed model documentation. NSERL Report No. 10. West Lafayette, Ind.: USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory

  • Palma A, González F, Cruickshank C (2015) Managed aquifer recharge as a key element in Sonora River basin management, Mexico. J Hydrol Eng https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001114, B4014004

  • Palutikof JP, Goodess CM, Watkins SJ, Holt T (2002) Generating rainfall and temperature scenarios at multiple sites: examples from the Mediterranean. J Clim 15(24):3529–3548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian B, Corte-Real J, Xu H (2002) Multisite stochastic weather models for impact studies. Intl J Climatol 22(11):1377–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan B, Lall U (1999) A K-nearest neighbor simulator for daily precipitation and other variables. Water Resour Res 35(10):3089–3101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner D, Achberger C, Chen D (2016) A multi-state weather generator for daily precipitation for the Torne River basin, northern Sweden/western Finland. Adv Clim Change Res 7:70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CW (1981) Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water Resour Res 17(1):182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CW, Wright DA (1984) WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables. Publ. ARS-8. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C.

  • Semenov MA, Barrow EM (2002) LARS-WG: A stochastic weather generator for use in climate impact studies. User manual. Harpenden, Rothamsted Research, UK

  • Singh VP, Frevert DK (2001) Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology. Water Resour Publ, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks NJ, Hardwick SR, Schmid M, Toumi R (2018) IMAGE: a multivariate multi-site stochastic weather generator for European weather and climate. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:771–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanthan R, McMahon TA (2001) Stochastic generation of annual, monthly and daily climate data: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5(4):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanthan R, Pegram GGS (2009) A nested multisite daily rainfall stochastic generation model. J Hydrol 371(1–4):142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinschneider S, Brown C (2013a) A semiparametric multivariate, multisite weather generator with low-frequency variability for use in climate risk assessments. Water Resour Res 49(11):7205–7220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinschneider S, Brown C (2013b) A semiparametric multivariate, multisite weather generator with low-frequency variability for use in climate risk assessments. Water Resour Res 49(11):7205–7220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockle CO, Campbell GS, Nelson R (1999) ClimGen manual. Washington State University, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Pullman

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarpanelli A, Franchini M, Brocca L, Camici S, Melone F, Moramarco T (2012) A simple approach for stochastic generation of spatial rainfall patterns. J Hydrol 472–473:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Themeßl MJ, Gobiet A, Leuprecht A (2011) Empirical statistical downscaling and error correction of daily precipitation from regional climate models. Int J Climatol 31:1530–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Nathan RJ (2007) A method for coupling daily and monthly time scales in stochastic generation of rainfall series. J Hydrol 346:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RW, Tomlinson OJ, Dawson CW (2003) Multisite simulation of precipitation by conditional resampling. Clim Res 23(3):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1992) Adapting stochastic weather generation algorithms for climate change studies. Clim Change 22:67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1998) Multisite generalization of a daily stochastic precipitation generation model. J Hydrol 210(1–4):178–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1999a) Multisite downscaling of daily precipitation with a stochastic weather generator. Clim Res 11:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1999b) Interannual variability and extreme-value characteristics of several stochastic daily precipitation models. Agr Forest Meteorol 93:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (2008) High-resolution spatial interpolation of weather generator parameters using local weighted regressions. Agric For Meteor 148(1):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Xu C-Y, Sælthun NR, Xu Y, Zhou B, Chen H (2015) Entropy theory based multi-criteria resampling of rain gauge networks for hydrological modelling—a case study of humid area in southern China. J Hydrol 525:138–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XC (2005) Spatial downscaling of global climate model output for site-specific assessment of crop production and soil erosion. Agric For Meteor 135:215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Garbrecht JD (2003) Evaluation of CLIGEN precipitation parameters and their implication on WEPP runoff and erosion prediction. T ASAE 46(2):311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 51779176, 41811520121, 51539009), the Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project) funded by Ministry of Education and State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs P.R. China (Grant no. B18037) and the Thousand Youth Talents Plan from the Organization Department of CCP Central Committee (Wuhan University, China). The authors wish to thank the China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System and the Hydrographic office of Hunan Province for respectively providing meteorological and streamflow data for the Xiangjiang watershed, and the Rio Tinto Alcan Company (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) for providing datasets for the Lac–Saint–Jean watershed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Arsenault, R., Brissette, F.P. et al. Coupling annual, monthly and daily weather generators to simulate multisite and multivariate climate variables with low-frequency variability for hydrological modelling. Clim Dyn 53, 3841–3860 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04750-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04750-z

Keywords

Navigation