Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of peripheral stent placement after failed balloon angioplasty in patients with grafts who are on hemodialysis. We examined 30 Wallstents that were placed in 26 patients because balloon angioplasty failed or early restenosis (<3 months) occurred within 3 months. We retrospectively reviewed 267 consecutive balloon angioplasties performed in 71 patients with graft access between August 2000 and March 2007. Stent placements accounted for 30 (11.2%) of the 267 balloon angioplasties. The clinical success rate of stent placement was 93.3% (28 of 30 stent placements). The 3-, 6-, and 12-month primary patency rates were 73.3%, 39.3%, and 17.7%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year secondary patency rates were 90.2%, 83.8%, and 83.8%, respectively. Primary patency was significantly prolonged by stent placement after early restenosis compared with previous balloon angioplasty alone (P = 0.0059). Primary patency after stent placement was significantly lower than after successful balloon angioplasty without indications for stent placement (P = 0.0279). Secondary patency rates did not significantly differ between stent placement and balloon angioplasty alone. The mean number of reinterventions required to maintain secondary patency after stent placement was significantly larger than that after balloon angioplasty alone (Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.0419). We concluded that peripheral stent placement for graft access is effective for salvaging vascular access after failed balloon angioplasty and for prolonging patency in early restenosis after balloon angioplasty. However, reinterventions are required to maintain secondary patency after stent placement. Furthermore, peripheral stent placement for graft access cannot achieve the same primary patency as balloon angioplasty alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Trerotola SO, Stavropoulos SW, Shlansky-Goldberg R, Tuite CM, Kobrin S, Rudnick MR (2004) Hemodialysis-related venous stenosis:treatment with ultrahigh-pressure angioplasty balloons. Radiology 231(1):259–262
Kariya S, Tanigawa N, Kojima H et al (2007) Primary patency with cutting and conventional balloon angioplasty for different types of hemodialysis access stenosis. Radiology 243(2):578–587
Peregrin JH, Rocek M (2007) Results of a peripheral cutting balloon prospective multicenter European registry in hemodialysis vascular access. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(2):212–215
Tsetis D, Morgan R, Belli AM (2006) Cutting balloons for the treatment of vascular stenoses. Eur Radiol 16(8):1675–1683
National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (1997) NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 30(4 Suppl 3):S150–S191
Aruny JE, Lewis CA, Cardella JF et al (1999) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous management of the thrombosed or dysfunctional dialysis access. Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10(4):491–498
Gray RJ, Sacks D, Martin LG, Trerotola SO (2003) Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9; Pt 2):S433–S442
Turmel-Rodrigues LA, Blanchard D, Pengloan J et al (1997) Wallstents and Craggstents in hemodialysis grafts and fistulas: results for selective indications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8(6):975–982
Vogel PM, Parise C (2004) SMART stent for salvage of hemodialysis access grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(10):1051–1060
Sreenarasimhaiah VP, Margassery SK, Martin KJ, Bander SJ (2005) Salvage of thrombosed dialysis access grafts with venous anastomosis stents. Kidney Int 67(2):678–684
Maya ID, Allon M (2006) Outcomes of thrombosed arteriovenous grafts: comparison of stents vs. angioplasty. Kidney Int 69(5):934–937
Patel RI, Peck SH, Cooper SG et al (1998) Patency of Wallstents placed across the venous anastomosis of hemodialysis grafts after percutaneous recanalization. Radiology 209(2):365–370
Haage P, Vorwerk D, Piroth W, Schuermann K, Guenther RW (1999) Treatment of hemodialysis-related central venous stenosis or occlusion: results of primary Wallstent placement and follow-up in 50 patients. Radiology 212(1):175–180
Mickley V, Gorich J, Rilinger N, Storck M, Abendroth D (1997) Stenting of central venous stenoses in hemodialysis patients: long-term results. Kidney Int 51(1):277–280
Vorwerk D, Guenther RW, Mann H et al (1995) Venous stenosis and occlusion in hemodialysis shunts: follow-up results of stent placement in 65 patients. Radiology 195(1):140–146
Raynaud AC, Angel CY, Sapoval MR, Beyssen B, Pagny JY, Auguste M (1998) Treatment of hemodialysis access rupture during PTA with Wallstent implantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9(3):437–442
Kolakowski S Jr, Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD (2003) Salvaging prosthetic dialysis fistulas with stents: forearm versus upper arm grafts. J Vasc Surg 38(4):719–723
Cynamon J, Lakritz PS, Wahl SI, Bakal CW, Sprayregen S (1997) Hemodialysis graft declotting: description of the “lyse and wait” technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8(5):825–829
Beathard GA (1993) Gianturco self-expanding stent in the treatment of stenosis in dialysis access grafts. Kidney Int 43(4):872–877
Quinn SF, Schuman ES, Demlow TA et al (1995) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus endovascular stent placement in the treatment of venous stenoses in patients undergoing hemodialysis: intermediate results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6(6):851–855
Hoffer EK, Sultan S, Herskowitz MM, Daniels ID, Sclafani SJ (1997) Prospective randomized trial of a metallic intravascular stent in hemodialysis graft maintenance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8(6):965–973
Trerotola SO, Ponce P, Stavropoulos SW et al (2003) Physical examination versus normalized pressure ratio for predicting outcomes of hemodialysis access interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(11):1387–1394
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kariya, S., Tanigawa, N., Kojima, H. et al. Peripheral Stent Placement in Hemodialysis Grafts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32, 960–966 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9580-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9580-0