Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction of Intimal Hyperplasia withRe-188-labeled Stents in a Rabbit Model at 7and 26 Weeks: An Experimental Study

  • Laboratory investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of 188Re-labeled stents to reduce neointimal formation in a rabbit atherosclerosis model and to test the long-term effects at 7 and 26 weeks. Fifty-nine male New Zealand White rabbits were fed a 0.5% cholesterol diet for 4 weeks before balloon angioplasty and insertion of Palmaz stents in the infrarenal aorta. The animals were sacrificed 7 and 26 weeks after stent implantation. Control stents were compared with 188Re stents: (dose 1) 11.3 ± 1.8 MBq; (dose 2) 37.3 ± 4.2 MBq, and (dose 3) 80.1 ± 7.8 MBq. Each activity group consisted of a short-term (7 weeks) and a long-term group (26 weeks), resulting in a total of eight study groups. No thrombotic occlusion was observed. The neointimal formation in the control group was 2.11 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–6.52] mm2 at 7 weeks and 2.10 (0.62–7.11) at 26 weeks. In the treatment groups, neointima reduction was detectable at 7 weeks [dose 1: 0.33 (0.09–1.22) mm2; dose 2: 0.17 (0.05–0.57) mm2; dose 3: 0.03 (0.01–0.13) mm2]. After 26 weeks, a catch-up of neointimal formation in the radioactive groups was most obvious in the low-dose group [dose 1: 0.80 (0.28–2.29) mm2; dose 2: 0.18([0.06–0.52) mm2; dose 3: 0.50 (0.17–1.42) mm2]. Compared to the long-term control group, neointimal reduction was still >60%. No induction of neointimal formation was observed at the edges of the stents. Radiation resulted in delayed re-endothelialization. 188Re stents were capable to reduce intimal hyperplasia and did not cause thrombosis. The edge effect, which was the major limitation of 32P stents, was not observed in 188Re stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PW Serruys P Jaegere Particlede F Kiemeneij et al. (1994) ArticleTitleA comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group N Engl J Med 331 489–495 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czhs1anuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199408253310801 Occurrence Handle8041413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DL Fischman MB Leon DS Baim et al. (1994) ArticleTitleA randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators N Engl J Med 331 496–501 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czhs1amsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199408253310802 Occurrence Handle8041414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J Wiskirchen H Dittmann R Gebert et al. (2001) ArticleTitleDosisabhängige Auswirkungen des kombinierten Alpha/Beta-emitters 186-Rhenium auf das Wachstum humaner Gefaßwandzellen Rofo Fortschr GebRontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173 72–76 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7otFOitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2001-10234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J Wiskirchen H Dittmann R Kehlbach et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRhenium-188 for inhibition of human aortic smooth muscle cell proliferation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49 809–815 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXhtFegtrg%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01452-8 Occurrence Handle11172964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. G Tepe LM Dinkelborg U Brehme et al. (2001) ArticleTitleProphylaxis of restenosis with (186)Re-labeled stents in a rabbit model Circulation 104 480–485 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXmtFerurw%3D Occurrence Handle10.1161/hc3001.091457 Occurrence Handle11468213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. C Hehrlein M Stintz R Kinscherf et al. (1996) ArticleTitlePure beta-particle-emitting stents inhibit neointima formation in rabbits Circulation 93 641–645 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283jtFOrsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.93.4.641 Occurrence Handle8640989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. AJ Carter JR Laird LR Bailey et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of endovascular radiation from a beta-particle-emitting stent in a porcine coronary restenosis model. A dose-response study Circulation 94 2364–2368 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XntlehtL4%3D Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.94.10.2364 Occurrence Handle8921774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. C Hehrlein (2002) ArticleTitleRadioactive stents: problems and potential solutions Herz 27 17–22 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s15010-002-2338-0 Occurrence Handle11951792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. K Wilczek P Walichiewicz B Petelenz et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePost-stenting intravascular brachytherapy trials on hypercholesterolemic rabbits using 32P liquid sources: implications for prevention of in-stent restenosis Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25 307–313 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00270-002-1879-z Occurrence Handle12042990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P Wexberg G Beran I Lang et al. (2003) ArticleTitlePercutaneous interventions in radiation-associated coronary in-stent restenosis Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26 154–157 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3osFChtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00270-002-2644-z Occurrence Handle12638038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duda SH, Poerner TC, Wiesinger B, et al. (2003) Drug-eluting stents: potential applications for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. RS Schwartz KC Huber JG Murphy et al. (1992) ArticleTitleRestenosis and proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model J Am Coll Cardiol 19 267–274 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387itFGltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0735-1097(92)90476-4 Occurrence Handle1732351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. W Sapirstein B Zuckerman J Dillard (2003) ArticleTitleFDA approval of coronary artery brachytherapy N Engl J Med 344 297–302 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200101253440410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. MA Grise V Massullo S Jani et al. (2002) ArticleTitleFive-year clinical follow-up after intracoronary radiation: results of a randomized clinical trial Circulation 105 2737–2740 Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.0000018126.87045.E0 Occurrence Handle12057987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. P Rubin JP Williams MC Schell et al. (1999) ArticleTitleRadiation inhibition of arterial restenosis—a new frontier Acta Oncol 38 407–424 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzksFSnug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/028418699431933 Occurrence Handle10418707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. I Crocker (1999) ArticleTitleRadiation therapy to prevent coronary artery restenosis Semin Radiat Oncol 9 134–143 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzgvFalsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1053-4296(99)80003-4 Occurrence Handle10092705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. AJ Taylor PD Gorman A Farb et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLong-term coronary vascular response to (32)P beta-emitting stents in a canine model Circulation 100 2366–2372 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FlsVWgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.100.23.2366 Occurrence Handle10587342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. R Albeiro M Adamian N Kobayashi et al. (2000) ArticleTitleShort- and intermediate-term results of (32)P radioactive beta-emitting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: The Milan dose–respose study Circulation 101 18–26 Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.101.1.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DJ Brenner RC Miller (2001) ArticleTitleLong-term efficacy of intracoronary irradiation in inhibiting in-stent restenosis Circulation 103 1330–1332 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3msFGjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.103.9.1330 Occurrence Handle11238281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. IP Kay AJ Wardeh K Kozuma et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRadioactive stents delay but do not prevent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia Circulation 103 14–17 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fosl2qsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.103.1.14 Occurrence Handle11136678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. A Farb AL Tang S Shroff et al. (2000) ArticleTitleNeointimal responses 3 months after (32)P beta-emitting stent placement Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48 889–898 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FgvFamuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00661-1 Occurrence Handle11020587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. A Farb S Shroff M John W Sweet et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLate arterial responses (6 and 12 months) after (32)P beta-emitting stent placement: sustained intimal suppression with incomplete healing Circulation 103 1912–1919 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3gvFOntQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.103.14.1912 Occurrence Handle11294812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. H Hanke J Kamenz S Hassenstein et al. (1995) ArticleTitleProlonged proliferative response of smooth muscle cells after experimental intravascular stenting Eur Heart J 16 785–793 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fns1Wjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7588922

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. JN Wilcox R Waksman SB King et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe role of the adventitia in the arterial response to angioplasty: the effect of intravascular radiation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36 789–796 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s7hvFygsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00299-4 Occurrence Handle8960504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunnar Tepe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tepe, G., Dietrich, T., Grafen, F. et al. Reduction of Intimal Hyperplasia withRe-188-labeled Stents in a Rabbit Model at 7and 26 Weeks: An Experimental Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28, 632–637 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0308-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0308-x

Keywords

Navigation