Skip to main content
Log in

Mercury Biomagnification in the Aquaculture Pond Ecosystem in the Pearl River Delta

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the first study to investigate the rate of mercury (Hg) biomagnification in the aquaculture pond ecosystem of the Pearl River Delta (PRD), China, by analyzing total mercury (THg) and methyl mercury (MeHg) concentrations in various species of fish at different trophic levels (TLs). Species representing a gradient of trophic positions in the aquaculture pond food chains were chosen for analyzing THg and MeHg concentrations. In this study, there were two kinds of the aquaculture pond food chains: (1) omnivorous (fish feeds, zooplankton, grass carp [Ctenopharyngodon idellus], and bighead carp [Aristichthys nobilis]) and (2) predatory (zooplankton, mud carp [Cirrhina molitorella], and mandarin fish [Siniperca kneri]). Bighead carp and mandarin fish had the highest MeHg and THg concentrations, i.e., an order of magnitude higher than other species, in their respective food chains. More than 90% of the THg concentrations detected in bighead carp, mandarin fish, and mud carp were in the methylated form. In this study, %MeHg increased with TLs and MeHg concentrations, reflecting that MeHg is the dominant chemical species of Hg accumulated in higher concentrations in biota, especially biota associated with higher TLs in the food chains. The trophic magnification factors were 2.32 and 2.60 for MeHg and 1.94 and 2.03 for THg in omnivorous and predatory food chains, respectively, in PRD. Hg concentrations in fish tissue correlated to Hg levels in the ambient environment, and sediment seemed to be the major source for Hg accumulated in fish. In addition, feeding habit also affected Hg accumulation in different fish species. Four significant linear relationships were obtained between log-THg and δ15N and between log-MeHg and δ15N. The slope of the regression equations, as biomagnification power, was smaller in magnitude compared with those reported for temperate and arctic marine and freshwater ecosystems, indicating that THg and MeHg biomagnifications were lower in this PRD subtropical aquaculture pond ecosystem. This was probably due to low Hg bioavailability at lower TLs as well as individual feeding behavior of fish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Reasi HA, Ababneh FA, Lean DR (2007) Evaluating mercury biomagnification in fish from a tropical marine environment using stable isotopes (delta C-13 and delta N-15). Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1572–1581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bank MS, Chesney E, Shine JP, Maage A, Senn DB (2007) Mercury bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in sympatric snapper species from the Gulf of Mexico. Ecol Appl 17:2100–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom NS (1992) On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1010–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles KC, Apte SC, Maher WA, Kawai M, Smith R (2001) Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of mercury in Lake Murray, Papua New Guinea. J Fish Aquat Sci 58:888–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CE, Massaut L (1999) Risks associated with the use of chemicals in pond aquaculture. Aquacult Eng 20:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LM, Hecky RE, Nyaundi J, Muggide R, Dixon DG (2003) Distribution and food-web transfer of mercury in Napoleon and Winam Gulfs, Lake Victoria, East Africa. J Gt Lakes Res 29:267–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LM, Norstrom RJ, Hobson KA, Muir DCG, Backus S, Fisk AT (2005) Mercury and other trace elements in a pelagic Arctic marine food web (Northwater Polynya, Baffin Bay). Sci Total Environ 351–352:247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CY, Stemberger RS, Klaue B, Blum JD, Pickhardt PC, Folt CL (2000) Accumulation of heavy metals in food web components across a gradient of lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1525–1536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CY, Dionne M, Mayes BM, Ward DM, Sturup S, Jackson BP (2009) Mercury bioavailability and bioaccumulation in estuarine food webs in the Gulf of Maine. Environ Sci Technol 43:1804–1810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung KC, Leung HM, Wong MH (2008) Metal concentrations of common freshwater and marine fish from the Pearl River Delta, South China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:705–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deniro MJ, Epstein S (1981) Influence of diet on the distribution of nitrogen isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 45:341–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CT, Yan C, Schofield C, Munson R, Holsapple J (1994) The mercury cycle and fish in the Adirondack lakes. Environ Sci Technol 28:136A–143A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CT, Han YJ, Chen CY, Evers DC, Lambert KF, Holsen TM et al (2007) Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the Northeastern United States. Bioscience 57:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk AT, Norstrom RJ, Cymbalisty CD, Muir DCG (1998) Dietary accumulation and depuration of hydrophobic organochlorines: bioaccumulation parameters and their relationship with the octanol/water partition coefficient. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:951–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald WF, Engstrom DR, Mason RP, Nater EA (1998) The case for atmospheric mercury contamination in remote areas. Environ Sci Technol 32:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour CC, Henry EA, Mitchell R (1992) Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Environ Sci Technol 26:2281–2287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K et al (1997) Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 19:417–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmidt CR, Fitzgerald WF (2004) Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments. Environ Sci Technol 38:1487–1495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmidt CR, Fitzgerald WF (2006) Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of methylmercury in Long Island Sound. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51:416–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrad SJ, Smith DJT (1997) Bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) and biota to sediment accumulation factors (BSAFs) for PCBs in pike and eels. Environ Sci Pollut R 4:189–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson KA, Ambrose WG, Renaud PE (1995) Sources of primary production, benthic-pelagic coupling, and trophic relationships within the Northeast Water Polynya: insights from delta C-13 and delta N-15 analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 128:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hop H, Borga K, Gabrielsen GW, Kleivane L, Skaare JU (2002) Food web magnification of persistent organic pollutants in poikilotherms and homeotherms from the Barents Sea. Environ Sci Technol 36:2589–2597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu JY, Jin F, Wan Y, Yang M, An LH, An W et al (2005) Trophodynamic behavior of 4-monylphenol and nonylphenol polyethoxylate in a marine aquatic food web from Bohai Bay, North China: comparison to DDTs. Environ Sci Technol 39:4801–4807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemoto T, Tu NPC, Okuda N, Iwata A, Omori K, Tanabe S et al (2008) Biomagnification of trace elements in the aquatic food web in the Mekong Delta, South Vietnam using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:504–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger I, Hop H, Gabrielsen GW (2009) Biomagnification of mercury in selected species from an Arctic marine food web in Svalbard. Sci Total Environ 407:4744–4751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman WM, Hobson KA, Sydeman WJ, Bacon CE, McLaren EB (1996) Influence of trophic position and feeding location on contaminant levels in the gulf of the farallones food web revealed by stable isotope analysis. Environ Sci Technol 30:654–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jernelöv A, Lann H (1971) Mercury accumulation in food chains. Oikos 22:403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd KA, Bootsma HA, Hesslein RH, Lockhart WL, Hecky RE (2003) Mercury concentrations in the food web of Lake Malawi, East Africa. J Gt Lakes Res 29:258–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertsson L, Nilsson M (2006) Organic material: the primary control on mercury methylation and ambient methyl mercury concentrations in estuarine sediments. Environ Sci Technol 40:1822–1829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence AL, Mason RP (2001) Factors controlling the bioaccumulation of mercury and methylmercury by the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus. Environ Pollut 111:217–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo CP (1990) People and environment in the Zhu Jiang Delta of South China. Natl Geogr Res 6:400–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsalek P, Svobodova Z, Randak T (2007) The content of total mercury and methylmercury in common carp from selected Czech ponds. Aquac Int 15:299–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RP, Lawrence AL (1999) Concentration, distribution, and bioavailability of mercury and methylmercury in sediments of Baltimore Harbor and Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2438–2447

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntrye JK, Beauchamp DA (2007) Age and trophic position dominate bioaccumulation of mercury and organochlorines in the food web of lake Washington. Sci Total Environ 372:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minagawa M, Wada E (1984) Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: further evidence and the relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:1135–1140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monperrus M, Tessier E, Point D, Vidimova K, Amouroux D, Guyoneaud R et al (2007) The biogeochemistry of mercury at the sediment-water interface in the Thau Lagoon. 2. Evaluation of mercury methylation potential in both surface sediment and the water column. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 72:485–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muhaya BBM, Leermakers M, Baeyens W (1997) Total mercury and methylmercury in sediments and in the polychaete Nereis diversicolor at Groot Buitenschoor (Scheldt estuary, Belgium). Water Air Soil Pollut 94:109–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power M, Klein GM, Guiguer KRRA, Kwan MKH (2002) Mercury accumulation in the fish community of a sub-Arctic lake in relation to trophic position and carbon sources. J Appl Ecol 39:819–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo JC, Ozamiz G, Etxebarria N, Tueros I, Munoz C, Muela A et al (2008) Mercury biomethylation assessment in the estuary of Bilbao (North of Spain). Environ Pollut 156:482–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riget F, Dietz R, Johansen P, Asmund G (2000) Lead, cadmium, mercury and selenium in Greenland marine biota and sediments during AMAP phase 1. Sci Total Environ 245:3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen JT, Seppanen K, Nyyssonen K, Korpela H, Kauhanen J, Kantola M et al (1995) Intake of mercury from fish, lipid-peroxidation, and the risk of myocardial-infarction and coronary, cardiovascular, and any death in Eastern Finnish men. Circulation 91:645–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Streets SS, Henderson SA, Stoner AD, Carlson DL, Simcik MF, Swackhamer DL (2006) Partitioning and bioaccumulation of PBDEs and PCBs in Lake Michigan. Environ Sci Technol 40:7263–7269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland EM, Gobas F, Branfireun BA, Heyes A (2006) Environmental controls on the speciation and distribution of mercury in coastal sediments. Mar Chem 102:111–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay A, Lucotte M, Meili M, Cloutier L, Pichet P (1996) Total mercury and methylmercury contents of insects from Boreal Lakes: ecological, spatial and temporal patterns. Water Qual Res J Can 31:851–873

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997a) Determination of carbon and nitrogen in sediments and particulates of estuarine/coastal waters using elemental analysis. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/microbes/m440_0.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2010

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997b) Mercury study report to Congress. EPA-452/R-97-005

  • Zhou HY, Wong MH (2000) Mercury accumulation in freshwater fish with emphasis on the dietary influence. Water Res 34:4234 United States Environmental Protection Agency 4242

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Cooperate Research Ground (Grant No. HKBU 1/07C), Special Equipment Grant No. HKBU09 from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong, and Mini-Area of Excellence Fund of Hong Kong Baptist University (RC/AOE/08-09/01) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Kunci Chen, Kaibin Li (Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China), and Jufang Chen (Institute of the Hydrobiology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, PR China) for field assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Hung Wong.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 116 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, Z., Liang, P., Shao, DD. et al. Mercury Biomagnification in the Aquaculture Pond Ecosystem in the Pearl River Delta. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 61, 491–499 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-010-9641-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-010-9641-z

Keywords

Navigation