Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of Bacillus subtilis spore survival after a combined non-isothermal-isothermal heat treatment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different inactivation kinetics data have been used to predict the number of survivors exposed to a heat treatment and, in consequence, to design thermal processes for the food industry. In this work, spores of an acidophilic strain of Bacillus subtilis were heated under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Experimental results obtained after isothermal treatments were analysed using the classical two-step linear regression procedure and a one-step non-linear regression method. Data obtained after non-isothermal treatments were analysed using a one-step, non-linear procedure. Kinetic parameters obtained from isothermal heating were close, either using the two-step linear regression (D 100=6.5 min) or the one-step non-linear regression (D 100=6.3 min), although the second method gave smaller 95% confidence intervals. The z values derived from non-isothermal heating were higher than those obtained in isothermal conditions (z=9.3 °C for non-isothermal heating at 1 °C/min versus z=7.7 °C for isothermal heating one step non-linear regression). Results were validated with experimental data obtained after different heat treatments, consisting of a phase of temperature increase at a fixed rate, followed by a holding phase. Non-isothermal methods predicted accurately the number of survivors after the heating ramp, while isothermal methods were more accurate for the holding phase of the treatment. When a temperature profile of a typical heat treatment process applied in the food industry was simulated, all predictions were on the safe side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a, b
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peleg M, Cole MB (1998) Crit Rev Food Sci 38:353–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moats WA, Dabbah R, Edwards WM (1971) J Food Sci 36:523–526

    Google Scholar 

  3. Periago PM, Palop A, Martínez A Fernández PS (2002) Dairy Food Environ Sanitation 22:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raso J, Alvarez I, Condón S, Sala Trepat FJ (2000) Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 1:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Welt BA, Teixeira AA, Balaban OM, Smerage GH, Hintinlang DE, Smittle BJ (1997) J Food Sci 62:529–538

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pflug IJ, Odlaug TE (1978) Food Technol 32:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  7. Monk JD, Beuchat LR, Doyle MP (1995) J Food Prot 58:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Gerwen SJC, Rombouts FM, van't Riet K, Zwietering MH (1999) J Food Prot 62:1024–1032

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arabshahi A, Lund DB (1985) J Food Process Eng 7:239–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández A, Ocio MJ, Fernández PS, Martínez A (2001) Int J Food Microbiol 63:257–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Periago PM, Leontidis S, Fernández PS, Rodrigo C, Martínez A (1998) Food Sci Technol Int 4:443–447

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández A, Ocio MJ, Fernández PS, Rodrigo M, Martínez A (1999) Food Microbiol 16:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reichart O (1979) Acta Aliment 8:131–155

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hayakawa KI, Schnell PG, Kleyn DH (1969) Food Technol 23:1990–1994

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cunha LM, Oliveira FAR, Brandao TRS, Oliveira JC (1997) J Food Eng 33:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Cordt S, Hendrickx M, Maesmans G, Tobback P (1992) Int J Food Sci Technol 27:661–673

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leontidis S, Fernández A, Rodrigo C, Fernández PS, Magraner L, Martínez A (1999) J Food Prot 62:958–961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fields ML, Zamora AF, Bradsher M (1977) J Food Sci 42:931–934

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez JH, Cousin MA, Nelson PE (1993) J Food Prot 56:165–168

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cazemier AE, Wagenaars SFM, terSteeg PF (2001) J Appl Microbiol 90:761–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Condón S, Arrizubieta MJ, Sala FJ (1993) J Microbiol Methods 18:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología of the Spanish Government through the Project AGL-2000-0494.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo Palop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conesa, R., Periago, P.M., Esnoz, A. et al. Prediction of Bacillus subtilis spore survival after a combined non-isothermal-isothermal heat treatment. Eur Food Res Technol 217, 319–324 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0749-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0749-5

Keywords

Navigation