Skip to main content
Log in

How to address group dynamics in virtual worlds

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of group dynamics highlights the activity in the group in terms of its performance and communication. The experience of facilitating virtual communities and teams (Eunice and Kimball in http://www.Tmn.com/~lisa/odn-teams.htm, 1997) suggests that groups go through the same stages either in face-to-face or in online mode. The paper brings together a theoretical framework based on the literature on virtual communities, Gestalt systems and online facilitation in order to address the issue of electronic togetherness, in particular from a group dynamics perspective. The empirical work on which the paper is based is an observation of a group of students in a training set playing a decision-making game. The model of Tuckman (Tuckman in Psychol Bull 63:384–399, 1965; Tuckman and Jensen in Group Organ Stud 2:419–427, 1977) is used as a framework within which to discuss the findings of the case. The paper finishes with concrete recommendations for facilitators of online communities and designers of the electronic spaces where these communities operate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque AL, Velho L (2003) Togetherness through virtual worlds: how real can be that presence? http://www.visgraf.impa.br/RefBib/Data/PS_PDF/nelmapresence2002/togetherness2002.pdf

  • Armstrong D (1999) Making absences present: the contribution of WR Bion to understanding unconscious social phenomena. http://www.shef.ac.uk/~psysc/group/chap3.html

  • Arnheim R (1999) Gestalten and computers. Gestalt Theory J 21(3):181–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Benne S, Sheats B (1948) Functional roles of group members. J Soc Issues 4:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley T (1994) Facilitation: providing opportunities for learning. J Ind Train 18(5):8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia R (1999) A rhizomic model of organisational change and transformation: perspective from a metaphysics of change. Br J Manag 10:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson P (1995) Change in organisations. Whurr Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey I (1999) Grounding grounded theory. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze G, Guattari F (1972) Anti-oedipus, capitalism and schizophrenia, translated by Huxley R, Seem M, Lane H. Viking Press, New York

  • Durlach N, Slater M (1998) Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. BT presence workshop. http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/m.slater/BTWorkshop/durlach.html

  • Estes CP (1992) Women who run with the wolves. Rider Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Eunice A, Kimball L (1997) Zen and the art of facilitating virtual teams, presentation for OD network annual conferment, October 1997. http://www.Tmn.com/~lisa/odn-teams.htm

  • Fernback J, Thompson B (1995) Computer mediated communication and the American collectivity: the dimension of community within cyberspace. In: Annual convention of the international communication association, Albuquerque, NM

  • Grudin J (1994) Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Commun ACM 37(1):92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth P, Kimble C, Wright P (1998) Computer mediated communications and international communities of practice. In: Proceedings of Ethicomp’98, March. Erasmus University, The Netherlands, pp 275–286

  • Honey P (1994) Teams and leaders, Trainer’s guide. Melrose Film Productions

  • Hunt J (1979) Managing people at work. Pan

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1998) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(4)

  • Jones Q (1997) Virtual communities, virtual settlements and cyber-archaeology: a theoretical outline. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(3). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue3/jones.html

  • Jorn L, Duin AH, Wahlstrom (1996) Designing and managing virtual learning communities. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 39(4):183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin JA (1992) Education on the networks of today and tomorrow: the integration of computer-supported cooperative learning and work. ACM SIGCUE Outlook 21(3):8–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolopoulou K (2001) Internal report on on-line facilitation competences

  • Nicolopoulou K, Kostomaj M (2002) Evaluation of the group dynamics in the decision-making game. Internal report

  • Norman DA (2002) The design of everyday things. Basic Books, New York, reprint 1988 (originally published as The psychology of everyday things)

  • Palloff R, Pratt K (1999) Defining and redefining community, chapter 2. In: Building learning communities in cyberspace: effective strategies for the online classroom. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

  • Pinelle D, Gutwin C (2001) Group task analysis for groupware usability evaluations. In: Proceedings of IEEE wetice 2001

  • Poldony JM, Page KL (1998) Network forms of organisation. Annu Rev Sociol 24:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece J (2000) Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees F (1998) The facilitator excellence handbook: helping people work creatively and productively together. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds M (1994) Groupwork in education and training. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold H (1993) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair G, Cuttell D, Vandeveer R, Menefee M (2002) Human behavior in organizations, 4th edn. Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelberg S (1982) The phenomenological movement: a historical introduction, 3rd edn. M. Nijhof Publishers, Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan M, Walter C (1997) How English works. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott D, Gaston A (1993) Paradigm shift: the new promise of information technology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie A, Boyle J (2000) Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: a review and case study. Comput Educ 34(2):119–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman B (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull 63:384–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman B, Jensen M (1977) Stages of small group development. Group Organ Stud 2:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls J (1993) Global networking for local development. In: Harasim L (ed) Global networks. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger EC, Snyder WM (2000) Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harv Bus Rev, January

  • Wertheimer (1924) Source book of Gestalt psychology, translated by Ellis W, 1938. Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York

  • White N (2001) The arts of facilitation. http://www.fullcirc.com/community/communityfacilitation.htm

  • Yin RK (1994) Case study research, design and methods. Sage publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katerina Nicolopoulou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicolopoulou, K., Koštomaj, M. & Campos, A. How to address group dynamics in virtual worlds. AI & Soc 20, 351–371 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0027-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0027-0

Keywords

Navigation