Abstract
In this paper we present a large class of flux backgrounds and solve the shortest vector problem in type IIB string theory on an orientifold of the 19 Landau-Ginzburg model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
K. Becker, M. Becker, C. Vafa and J. Walcher, Moduli stabilization in non-geometric backgrounds, Nucl. Phys. B 770 (2007) 1 [hep-th/0611001] [INSPIRE].
K. Becker, E. Gonzalo, J. Walcher and T. Wrase, Fluxes, vacua, and tadpoles meet Landau-Ginzburg and Fermat, JHEP 12 (2022) 083 [arXiv:2210.03706] [INSPIRE].
P. Candelas, G.T. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Vacuum configurations for superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B 258 (1985) 46 [INSPIRE].
J. Polchinski, Dirichlet branes and Ramond-Ramond charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4724 [hep-th/9510017] [INSPIRE].
J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, New vacua for type II string theory, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 736 [hep-th/9510227] [INSPIRE].
T.R. Taylor and C. Vafa, R R flux on Calabi-Yau and partial supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 130 [hep-th/9912152] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings, S. Kachru and J. Polchinski, Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 106006 [hep-th/0105097] [INSPIRE].
A. Giryavets, S. Kachru, P.K. Tripathy and S.P. Trivedi, Flux compactifications on Calabi-Yau threefolds, JHEP 04 (2004) 003 [hep-th/0312104] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef, M.R. Douglas and B. Florea, Building a better racetrack, JHEP 06 (2004) 034 [hep-th/0404257] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef et al., Fixing all moduli in a simple f-theory compactification, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9 (2005) 861 [hep-th/0503124] [INSPIRE].
A. Collinucci, F. Denef and M. Esole, D-brane deconstructions in IIB orientifolds, JHEP 02 (2009) 005 [arXiv:0805.1573] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, J. Blabäck, M. Graña and S. Lüst, The tadpole problem, JHEP 11 (2021) 223 [arXiv:2010.10519] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, J. Blabäck, M. Graña and S. Lüst, Algorithmically solving the tadpole problem, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 32 (2022) 7 [arXiv:2103.03250] [INSPIRE].
J. Bardzell et al., Type IIB flux compactifications with h1,1 = 0, JHEP 06 (2022) 166 [arXiv:2203.15818] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, L. Horer and P. Marconnet, Charting the landscape of (anti-)de Sitter and Minkowski solutions of 10d supergravities, JHEP 06 (2022) 131 [arXiv:2201.04152] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, L. Horer and P. Marconnet, Exploring the landscape of (anti-)de Sitter and Minkowski solutions: group manifolds, stability and scale separation, JHEP 08 (2022) 109 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2022) 184] [arXiv:2204.05327] [INSPIRE].
K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack and J. Louis, Supersymmetry breaking and α′ corrections to flux induced potentials, JHEP 06 (2002) 060 [hep-th/0204254] [INSPIRE].
K. Becker and M. Becker, M theory on eight manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 155 [hep-th/9605053] [INSPIRE].
S. Gukov, C. Vafa and E. Witten, CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds, Nucl. Phys. B 584 (2000) 69 [Erratum ibid. 608 (2001) 477] [hep-th/9906070] [INSPIRE].
K. Dasgupta, G. Rajesh and S. Sethi, M theory, orientifolds and G-flux, JHEP 08 (1999) 023 [hep-th/9908088] [INSPIRE].
K. Hori, A. Iqbal and C. Vafa, D-branes and mirror symmetry, hep-th/0005247 [INSPIRE].
C. Vafa, String vacua and orbifoldized L-G models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 1169 [INSPIRE].
A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus, D-branes in Gepner models, Nucl. Phys. B 531 (1998) 185 [hep-th/9712186] [INSPIRE].
I. Brunner, M.R. Douglas, A.E. Lawrence and C. Romelsberger, D-branes on the quintic, JHEP 08 (2000) 015 [hep-th/9906200] [INSPIRE].
I. Brunner and K. Hori, Orientifolds and mirror symmetry, JHEP 11 (2004) 005 [hep-th/0303135] [INSPIRE].
I. Brunner, K. Hori, K. Hosomichi and J. Walcher, Orientifolds of Gepner models, JHEP 02 (2007) 001 [hep-th/0401137] [INSPIRE].
R. Kannan, Minkowski’s convex body theorem and integer programming, Math. Oper. Res. 12 (1987) 415.
D. Micciancio and P. Voulgaris, A deterministic single exponential time algorithm for most lattice problems based on Voronoi cell computations, SIAM J. Comput. 42 (2013) 1364.
M. Ajtai, R. Kumar and D. Sivakumar, A sieve algorithm for the shortest lattice vector problem, in Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on theory of computing — STOC ′01, ACM, U.S.A. (2001), p. 601 [https://doi.org/10.1145/380752.380857].
M. Ajtai, The shortest vector problem in L2 is NP-hard for randomized reductions (extended abstract), in Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on theory of computing — STOC ′98, ACM, U.S.A. (1998) [https://doi.org/10.1145/276698.276705].
nait400/Flux_Tadpole_Shortest_Vector. Code NOmegas_WOri.nb, with precise equations. GitHub repository, https://github.com/nait400/Flux_Tadpole_Shortest_Vector.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Timm Wrase, Muthusamy Rajaguru and Johannes Walcher for helpful discussions. Portions of this research were conducted with the advanced computing resources provided by Texas A&M High Performance Research Computing. In particular we would like to thank Grigory Rogachev, Wilson Waldrop, Lisa Perez and Marinus Pennings for their invaluable help with setting up the computational part of this project. AS thanks William Linch for valuable feedback on an initial draft of the paper. NB and AS thank the Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation for their hospitality during the Cook’s Branch Workshop 2023 where part of this work was done. This work was partially supported by the NSF grant PHY-2112859.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2310.00770
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, K., Brady, N. & Sengupta, A. On fluxes in the 19 Landau-Ginzburg model. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)152
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)152