Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting combinatorial ambiguities at Hadron Colliders with M T2

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a method to resolve combinatorial issues in multi-particle final states at hadron colliders. The use of kinematic variables such as M T2 and invariant mass significantly reduces combinatorial ambiguities in the signal, but at a cost of losing statistics. We illustrate this idea with gluino pair production leading to 4 jets \( {\not{E}_T} \) in the final state as well as \( t\bar{t} \) production in the dilepton channel. Compared to results in recent studies, our method provides greater efficiency with similar purity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.J. Barr and C.G. Lester, A Review of the Mass Measurement Techniques proposed for the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 123001 [arXiv:1004.2732] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A.J. Barr et al., Guide to transverse projections and mass-constraining variables, arXiv:1105.2977 [SPIRES].

  3. A.J. Barr et al., A Storm in a‘T’Cup, arXiv:1108.5182 [SPIRES].

  4. I. Hinchliffe, F.E. Paige, M.D. Shapiro, J. Soderqvist and W. Yao, Precision SUSY measurements at LHC, Phys.Rev. D55 (1997)5520 [hep-ph/9610544] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. ATLAS collaboration, N. Ozturk, SUSY Parameters Determination with ATLAS, arXiv:0710.4546 [SPIRES].

  6. B. Dutta, T. Kamon, N. Kolev and A. Krislock, Bi-Event Subtraction Technique at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 475 [arXiv:1104.2508] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Alwall, A. Freitas and O. Mattelaer, The Matrix Element Method and QCD Radiation, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 074010 [arXiv:1010.2263] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Alwall, K. Hiramatsu, M.M. Nojiri and Y. Shimizu, Novel reconstruction technique for New Physics processes with initial state radiation, Phys.Rev.Lett. 103 (2009) 151802 [arXiv:0905.1201] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.M. Nojiri and K. Sakurai, Controlling ISR in sparticle mass reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115026 [arXiv:1008.1813] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Konar, K. Kong and K.T. Matchev, \( {\sqrt {{\hat{s}}}_{\min }} \) : A Global inclusive variable for determining the mass scale of new physics in events with missing energy at hadron colliders, JHEP 03 (2009) 085 [arXiv:0812.1042] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Konar, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, RECO level \( {\sqrt {s}_{\min }} \) and subsystem \( {\sqrt {s}_{\min }} \) : Improved global inclusive variables for measuring the new physics mass scale in E T events at hadron colliders, JHEP 06 (2011) 041.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Krohn, L. Randall and L.-T. Wang, On the Feasibility and Utility of ISR Tagging, arXiv:1101.0810 [SPIRES].

  13. J. Alwall et al., Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2008) 473 [arXiv:0706.2569] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Plehn, D. Rain water and P.Z. Skands, Squark and gluino production with jets, Phys. Lett. B 645 (2007) 217 [hep-ph/0510144] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti and J.G. Wacker, Model-Independent Jets plus Missing Energy Searches, Phys.Rev. D 79 (2009) 015005 [arXiv:0809.3264] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C.G. Lester and D.J. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders, Phys.Lett. B 463 (1999) 99 [hep-ph/9906349] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Barr, C. Lester and P. Stephens, m T2 : The Truth behind the glamour, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 2343 [hep-ph/0304226] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Burns, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, Using Subsystem MT2 for Complete Mass Determinations in Decay Chains with Missing Energy at Hadron Colliders, JHEP 03 (2009) 143 [arXiv:0810.5576] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. K.T. Matchev, F. Moortgat, L. Pape and M. Park, Precise reconstruction of sparticle masses without ambiguities, JHEP 08 (2009) 104 [arXiv:0906.2417] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Konar, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, Superpartner Mass Measurement Technique using1D Orthogonal Decompositions of the Cambridge Transverse Mass Variable M T2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 051802 [arXiv:0910.3679] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. K.T. Matchev and M. Park, A general method for determining the masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 061801 [arXiv:0910.1584] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Rajaraman and F. Yu, A New Method for Resolving Combinatorial Ambiguities at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 126 [arXiv:1009.2751] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Blanke, D. Curtin and M. Perelstein, SUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 035020 [arXiv:1004.5350] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Zhang, E.L. Berger, Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen and G. Shaughnessy, Color Sextet Vector Bosons and Same-Sign Top Quark Pairs at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 68 [arXiv:1009.5379] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. E.L. Berger, Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, G. Shaughnessy and H. Zhang, Color Sextet Scalars in Early LHC Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 181802 [arXiv:1005.2622] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. CMS collaboration, G.L. Bayatian et al., CMS technical design report, volume II:Physics performance, J. Phys. G 34 (2007) 995 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. ATLAS collaboration, E. Richter-Was, Prospect for the Higgs searches with the ATLAS detector, Acta Phys. Polon. B 40 (2009) 1909 [arXiv:0903.4198] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. CMS collaboration, G.L. Bayatian et al., CMS physics: Technical design report, CERN-LHCC-2006-001.

  30. A.J. Barr, B. Gripaios and C.G. Lester, Transverse masses and kinematic constraints: from the boundary to the crease, JHEP 11 (2009) 096 [arXiv:0908.3779] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Konar, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, Dark Matter Particle Spectroscopy at the LHC: Generalizing MT2 to Asymmetric Event Topologies, JHEP 04 (2010) 086 [arXiv:0911.4126] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Y.-C. Chen, private communication.

  33. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Conway, PGS 4,Pretty Good Simulation of high energy collisions http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/~conway/research/software/pgs/pgs4-general.htm.

  35. N. Kidonakis, Top quark cross sections and differential distributions, arXiv:1105.3481 [SPIRES].

  36. K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, FEWZ–Fully Exclusive W, Z Production through NNLO in pQCD, http://gate.hep.anl.gov/fpetriello/FEWZ.html.

  37. J. Campbell and K. Ellis, MCFM–Monte Carlo for FeMtobarn processes, http://mcfm.fnal.gov/.

  38. CDF collaboration, A Measurement of \( t\bar{t} \) Spin Correlations Coefficient in 2.8 fb 1 Dilepton Candidates, CDF note 9824.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathew McCaskey.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1109.1563

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baringer, P., Kong, K., McCaskey, M. et al. Revisiting combinatorial ambiguities at Hadron Colliders with M T2 . J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2011)101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2011)101

Keywords

Navigation