Abstract
Indirect and direct CP violations have been established in K L and B d decays. They have been found in two-body decay channels — with the exception of K L → π + π − e + e − transitions. Evidence for direct CP asymmetry has just appeared in LHCb data on A CP(D 0 → K + K −) − A CP(D 0 → π + π −) with 3.5σ significance. Manifestations of New Dynamics (ND) can appear in CP asymmetries just below experimental bounds. We discuss \( D_{{(s)}}^{\pm } \), \( {D^0}/{\overline D^0} \) and D L /D S transitions to 2-, 3- and 4-body final states with a comment on predictions for inclusive vs. exclusive CP asymmetries. In particular we discuss T asymmetries in D → h 1 h 2 l + l − in analogy with K L → π + π − e + e − transitions due to interference between M1, internal bremsstrahlung and possible E1 amplitudes. Such an effect depends on the strength of CP violation originating from the ND — as discussed here for Little Higgs Models with T parity and non-minimal Higgs sectors — but also in the interferences between these amplitudes even in the Standard Model. More general lessons can be learnt for T asymmetries in non-leptonic D decays like D → h 1 h 2 h 3 h 4. Such manifestations of ND can be tested at LHCb and other Super-Flavour Factories like the projects at KEK near Tokyo and at Tor Vergata/Frascati near Rome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y.H. Ahn, H.-Y. Cheng and S. Oh, Wolfenstein parametrization at higher order: seeming discrepancies and their resolution, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 571 [arXiv:1106.0935] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Evidence for CP-violation in time-integrated D 0 → h + h − decay rates, arXiv:1112.0938 [INSPIRE].
I. Bediaga et al., On a CP anisotropy measurement in the Dalitz plot, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 096006 [arXiv:0905.4233] [INSPIRE].
I.I. Bigi, A. Paul and S. Recksiegel, Conclusions from CDF results on CP-violation in D 0 → π + π − ,K + K − and future tasks, JHEP 06 (2011) 089 [arXiv:1103.5785] [INSPIRE].
CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Measurement of CP-violating asymmetries in D 0 → π + π − and D 0 → K + K − decays at CDF, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 012009 [arXiv:1111.5023] [INSPIRE].
Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton properties, arXiv:1010.1589 [INSPIRE].
L.M. Sehgal and M. Wanninger, CP violation in the decay K L → π + π − e + e −, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 1035 [INSPIRE].
L.M. Sehgal and M. Wanninger, Erratum: CP violation in the decay K L → π + π − e + e −, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5209.
B. Kayser, Kinematically nontrivial CP-violation in beauty decay, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 13 (1990) 487 [INSPIRE].
I.I. Bigi and L. Moroni eds., Heavy flavor physics: a probe of nature’s grand design, in Proceedings of the 137th Course of the International School of Physics ‘Enrico Fermi’, Varenna Italy, 8-18 July 1997, IOS Pr., Amsterdam Netherlands (1998) [INSPIRE].
I.I. Bigi and N.G. Uraltsev, \( {D^0} - {\overline D^0} \) oscillations as a probe of quark hadron duality, Nucl. Phys. B 592 (2001) 92 [hep-ph/0005089] [INSPIRE].
S. Bianco, F.L. Fabbri, D. Benson and I.I. Bigi, A Cicerone for the physics of charm, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 26N7 (2003) 1 [hep-ex/0309021] [INSPIRE].
M. Bobrowski, A. Lenz, J. Riedl and J. Rohrwild, How large can the SM contribution to CP-violation in \( {D^0} - {\overline D^0} \) mixing be?, JHEP 03 (2010) 009 [arXiv:1002.4794] [INSPIRE].
A. Lenz and M. Bobrowski, Standard model predictions for D 0 -oscillations and CP-violation, arXiv:1011.5608 [INSPIRE].
A.F. Falk, Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, Y. Nir and A.A. Petrov, The \( {D^0} - {\overline D^0} \) mass difference from a dispersion relation, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 114021 [hep-ph/0402204] [INSPIRE].
A.F. Falk, Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti and A.A. Petrov, SU(3) breaking and \( {D^0} - {\overline D^0} \) mixing, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 054034 [hep-ph/0110317] [INSPIRE].
K. Blum, Y. Grossman, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Combining \( {K^0} - {\overline K^0} \) mixing and \( {D^0} - {\overline D^0} \) mixing to constrain the flavor structure of new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 211802 [arXiv:0903.2118] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, S. Recksiegel, C. Tarantino and S. Uhlig, Littlest Higgs model with T-parity confronting the new data on \( {D^0} - {\overline D^0} \) mixing, Phys. Lett. B 657 (2007) 81 [hep-ph/0703254] [INSPIRE].
I.I. Bigi, M. Blanke, A.J. Buras and S. Recksiegel, CP violation in \( {D^0} - {\overline D^0} \) oscillations: general considerations and applications to the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, JHEP 07 (2009) 097 [arXiv:0904.1545] [INSPIRE].
L.M. Sehgal and J. van Leusen, Time evolution of decay spectrum in K 0 , \( {\overline K^0} \) → π + π − e + e−, Phys. Lett. B 489 (2000) 300 [hep-ph/0006336] [INSPIRE].
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777 [INSPIRE].
P. Heiliger and L. Sehgal, Direct and indirect CP-violation in the decay K L → π + π − e + e −, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4146 [INSPIRE].
P. Heiliger and L. Sehgal, Erratum: Direct and indirect CP-violation in the decay K L → π + π − e + e −, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 079902.
A. Paul, I.I. Bigi and S. Recksiegel, On D → X u l + l − within the standard model and frameworks like the littlest Higgs model with T parity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 114006 [arXiv:1101.6053] [INSPIRE].
T. Inami and C. Lim, Effects of superheavy quarks and leptons in low-energy weak processes K L → \( \mu \overline \mu \) , K + → π+ \( \nu \overline \nu \) and K 0 ↔ \( {\overline K^0} \), Prog. Theor. Phys. 65 (1981) 297 [INSPIRE].
G. Burdman, E. Golowich, J.L. Hewett and S. Pakvasa, Rare charm decays in the standard model and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 014009 [hep-ph/0112235] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla and A.J. Buras, The rare decays K + → \( {\pi^{ + }}\nu \overline \nu \) and K L → μ + μ − beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B 412 (1994) 106 [hep-ph/9308272] [INSPIRE].
A. Paul, I.I. Bigi and S. Recksiegel, D 0 → γγ and D 0 → μ + μ − rates on an unlikely impact of the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 094006 [arXiv:1008.3141] [INSPIRE].
M. Gronau and J.L. Rosner, Triple product asymmetries in K, D (s) and B (s) decays, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 096013 [arXiv:1107.1232] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, (De)constructing dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 4757 [hep-th/0104005] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction, Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed et al., The minimal moose for a little Higgs, JHEP 08 (2002) 021 [hep-ph/0206020] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen, T. Gregoire and J.G. Wacker, Phenomenology of electroweak symmetry breaking from theory space, JHEP 08 (2002) 020 [hep-ph/0202089] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Kaplan and M. Schmaltz, The little Higgs from a simple group, JHEP 10 (2003) 039 [hep-ph/0302049] [INSPIRE].
M. Schmaltz, The simplest little Higgs, JHEP 08 (2004) 056 [hep-ph/0407143] [INSPIRE].
M. Perelstein, Little Higgs models and their phenomenology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58 (2007) 247 [hep-ph/0512128] [INSPIRE].
T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath and L.-T. Wang, Phenomenology of the little Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 095004 [hep-ph/0301040] [INSPIRE].
H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, TeV symmetry and the little hierarchy problem, JHEP 09 (2003) 051 [hep-ph/0308199] [INSPIRE].
H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, Little hierarchy, little Higgses and a little symmetry, JHEP 08 (2004) 061 [hep-ph/0405243] [INSPIRE].
I. Low, T parity and the littlest Higgs, JHEP 10 (2004) 067 [hep-ph/0409025] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz and A.E. Nelson, The littlest Higgs, JHEP 07 (2002) 034 [hep-ph/0206021] [INSPIRE].
J. Hubisz and P. Meade, Phenomenology of the littlest Higgs with T-parity, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 035016 [hep-ph/0411264] [INSPIRE].
J. Hubisz, S.J. Lee and G. Paz, The flavor of a little Higgs with T-parity, JHEP 06 (2006) 041 [hep-ph/0512169] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke et al., Another look at the flavour structure of the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007) 253 [hep-ph/0609284] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke et al., Particle-antiparticle mixing, є K , δγ q , \( A_{\text{SL}}^q \) , A CP(B d → ψK S ), A CP(B s → ψϕ) and B → X s,d γ in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, JHEP 12 (2006) 003 [hep-ph/0605214] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, S. Recksiegel, C. Tarantino and S. Uhlig, Correlations between є ′ /є and rare K decays in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, JHEP 06 (2007) 082 [arXiv:0704.3329] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke and A.J. Buras, A guide to flavour changing neutral currents in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, Acta Phys. Polon. B 38 (2007) 2923 [hep-ph/0703117] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Buras and C. Tarantino, Quark and lepton flavour physics in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity, in Proceedings of the Workshop CKM2006, Nagoya Japan, 12-16 December 2006 [hep-ph/0702202] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, S. Recksiegel and C. Tarantino, The littlest Higgs model with T-parity facing CP-violation in \( {B_s} - {\overline B_s} \) mixing, arXiv:0805.4393 [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Recksiegel and C. Tarantino, FCNC processes in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity: an update, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41 (2010) 657 [arXiv:0906.5454] [INSPIRE].
A. Pich and P. Tuzón, Yukawa alignment in the two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 091702 [arXiv:0908.1554] [INSPIRE].
A. Pich, Flavour constraints on multi-Higgs-doublet models: Yukawa alignment, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 209 (2010) 182 [arXiv:1010.5217] [INSPIRE].
S. Pakvasa and H. Sugawara, Discrete symmetry and Cabibbo angle, Phys. Lett. B 73 (1978) 61 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to a great physicist and a wonderful friend — Bruce Winstein (1943-2011)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bigi, I.I., Paul, A. On CP asymmetries in two-, three- and four-body D decays. J. High Energ. Phys. 2012, 21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2012)021
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2012)021