Skip to main content
Log in

Gödel space from wrapped M2-branes

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We show that M-theory admits a supersymmetric compactification to the Gödel universe of the form Gödel3×S2×CY3. We interpret this geometry as coming from the backreaction of M2-branes wrapping the S2 in an AdS3×S2×CY3 flux compactification. In the black hole deconstruction proposal similar states give rise to the entropy of a D4-D0 black hole. The system is effectively described by a three-dimensional theory consisting of an axion-dilaton coupled to gravity with a negative cosmological constant. Other embeddings of the three-dimensional theory imply similar supersymmetric Gödel compactifications of type IIA/IIB string theory and F-theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Witten, Baryons and branes in Anti de Sitter space, JHEP 07 (1998) 006 [hep-th/9805112] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Bachas, M.R. Douglas and C. Schweigert, Flux stabilization of D-branes, JHEP 05 (2000) 048 [hep-th/0003037] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Simons, A. Strominger, D.M. Thompson and X. Yin, Supersymmetric branes in AdS 2 × S 2 × CY (3), Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 066008 [hep-th/0406121] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Raeymaekers and K.P. Yogendran, Supersymmetric D-branes in the D1-D5 background, JHEP 12 (2006) 022 [hep-th/0607150] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Raeymaekers, Open String Attractors, JHEP 04 (2007) 075 [hep-th/0702142] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Gaiotto, A. Simons, A. Strominger and X. Yin, D0-branes in black hole attractors, hep-th/0412179 [SPIRES].

  7. D. Gaiotto, A. Strominger and X. Yin, Superconformal black hole quantum mechanics, JHEP 11 (2005) 017 [hep-th/0412322] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Denef, D. Gaiotto, A. Strominger, D. Van den Bleeken and X. Yin, Black hole deconstruction, hep-th/0703252 [SPIRES].

  9. E.G. Gimon and T.S. Levi, Black ring deconstruction, JHEP 04 (2008) 098 [arXiv:0706.3394] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S.R. Das et al., Branes wrapping black holes, Nucl. Phys. B 733 (2006) 297 [hep-th/0507080] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Witten, Three-dimensional gravity revisited, arXiv:0706.3359 [SPIRES].

  12. W. Li, W. Song and A. Strominger, Chiral gravity in three dimensions, JHEP 04 (2008) 082 [arXiv:0801.4566] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. B.R. Greene, A.D. Shapere, C. Vafa and S.-T. Yau, Stringy cosmic strings and noncompact Calabi-Yau manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 1 [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Godel, An example of a new type of cosmological solutions of Einstein's field equations of graviation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 (1949) 447 [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Israel, Quantization of heterotic strings in a Gödel/Anti de Sitter spacetime and chronology protection, JHEP 01 (2004) 042 [hep-th/0310158] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J.P. Gauntlett, J.B. Gutowski, C.M. Hull, S. Pakis and H.S. Reall, All supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 4587 [hep-th/0209114] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. C.A.R. Herdeiro, Spinning deformations of the D1-D5 system and a geometric resolution of closed timelike curves, Nucl. Phys. B 665 (2003) 189 [hep-th/0212002] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Harmark and T. Takayanagi, Supersymmetric Gödel universes in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 662 (2003) 3 [hep-th/0301206] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Compere, S. Detournay and M. Romo, Supersymmetric Gödel and warped black holes in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 104030 [arXiv:0808.1912] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. E.G. Gimon and P. Hořava, Over-rotating black holes, Gödel holography and the hypertube, hep-th/0405019 [SPIRES].

  21. P. Berglund, E.G. Gimon and T.S. Levi, Supergravity microstates for BPS black holes and black rings, JHEP 06 (2006) 007 [hep-th/0505167] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. I. Bena and N.P. Warner, Bubbling supertubes and foaming black holes, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066001 [hep-th/0505166] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. de Boer, F. Denef, S. El-Showk, I. Messamah and D. Van den Bleeken, Black hole bound states in AdS 3 × S 2, JHEP 11 (2008) 050 [arXiv:0802.2257] [SPIRES].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.P. Gauntlett, R.C. Myers and P.K. Townsend, Supersymmetry of rotating branes, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 025001 [hep-th/9809065] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P.K. Townsend, Supermembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 189 (1987) 75 [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortín and G. Papadopoulos, κ-symmetry, supersymmetry and intersecting branes, Nucl. Phys. B 502 (1997) 149 [hep-th/9705040] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. E.J. Hackett-Jones, D.C. Page and D.J. Smith, Topological charges for branes in M-theory, JHEP 10 (2003) 005 [hep-th/0306267] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. D. Gaiotto, A. Strominger and X. Yin, The m5-brane elliptic genus: modularity and BPS states, hep-th/0607010.

  29. J. de Boer, M.C.N. Cheng, R. Dijkgraaf, J. Manschot and E. Verlinde, A Farey tail for attractor black holes, JHEP 11 (2006) 024 [hep-th/0608059] [SPIRES].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Raeymaekers, Near-horizon microstates of the D1-D5-P black hole, JHEP 02 (2008) 006 [arXiv:0710.4912] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Bellorin, P. Meessen and T. Ortin, All the supersymmetric solutions of N = 1, d = 5 ungauged supergravity, JHEP 01 (2007) 020 [hep-th/0610196].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Huebscher, P. Meessen and T. Ortin, Supersymmetric solutions of N = 2 d = 4 SUGRA: the whole ungauged shebang, Nucl. Phys. B 759 (2006) 228 [hep-th/0606281] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Strominger, Loop corrections to the universal hypermultiplet, Phys. Lett. B 421 (1998) 139 [hep-th/9706195] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Behrndt and S. Gukov, Domain walls and superpotentials from M theory on Calabi-Yau three-folds, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 225 [hep-th/0001082] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. G.W. Gibbons, M.B. Green and M.J. Perry, Instantons and seven-branes in type IIB superstring theory, Phys. Lett. B 370 (1996) 37 [hep-th/9511080] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. E.I. Semenov, New exact solutions to the nonautonomous Liouville equation, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 49 (2008) 166.

    Google Scholar 

  37. I. Bengtsson and P. Sandin, Anti-de Sitter space, squashed and stretched, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 971 [gr-qc/0509076].

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Rooman and P. Spindel, Goedel metric as a squashed Anti-de Sitter geometry, Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 3241 [gr-qc/9804027] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. D. Anninos, W. Li, M. Padi, W. Song and A. Strominger, Warped AdS 3 black holes, JHEP 03 (2009) 130 [arXiv:0807.3040] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. E.K. Boyda, S. Ganguli, P. Hořava and U. Varadarajan, Holographic protection of chronology in universes of the Gödel type, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 106003 [hep-th/0212087] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. N. Drukker, B. Fiol and J. Simon, Gödel's universe in a supertube shroud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 231601 [hep-th/0306057] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. V. Balasubramanian, E.G. Gimon and T.S. Levi, Four dimensional black hole microstates: from D-branes to spacetime foam, JHEP 01 (2008) 056 [hep-th/0606118] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Nuovo Cim. B44S10 (1966) 1 [Erratum ibid. B 48 (967) 463] [Nuovo Cim. B44 (1966) 1].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. J.R. David, G. Mandal, S. Vaidya and S.R. Wadia, Point mass geometries, spectral flow and AdS 3-CFT(2) correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B 564 (2000) 128 [hep-th/9906112] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. M.A. Shifman and T. ter Veldhuis, Calculating the tension of domain wall junctions and vortices in generalized Wess-Zumino models, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 065004 [hep-th/9912162] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. J. Dai, R.G. Leigh and J. Polchinski, New connections between string theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2073 [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. P. Horava and E. Witten, Heterotic and type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 506 [hep-th/9510209] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Marolf and M. Trodden, Black holes and instabilities of negative tension branes, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 065019 [hep-th/0102135] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. S.D. Mathur, The fuzzball proposal for black holes: An elementary review, Fortsch. Phys. 53 (2005) 793 [hep-th/0502050] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, S. El-Showk and I. Messamah, Black holes as effective geometries, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 214004 [arXiv:0811.0263] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. S.D. Mathur, Fuzzballs and the information paradox: a summary and conjectures, arXiv:0810.4525 [SPIRES].

  52. O. Lunin and S.D. Mathur, AdS/CFT duality and the black hole information paradox, Nucl. Phys. B 623 (2002) 342 [hep-th/0109154] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. S. Giusto and S.D. Mathur, Geometry of D1-D5-P bound states, Nucl. Phys. B 729 (2005) 203 [hep-th/0409067] [SPIRES]

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. S. Giusto, S.D. Mathur and A. Saxena, 3-charge geometries and their CFT duals, Nucl. Phys. B 710 (2005) 425 [hep-th/0406103] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. S. Giusto, S.D. Mathur and A. Saxena, Dual geometries for a set of 3-charge microstates, Nucl. Phys. B 701 (2004) 357 [hep-th/0405017] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. I. Bena and N.P. Warner, One ring to rule them all…and in the darkness bind them?, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9 (2005) 667 [hep-th/0408106] [SPIRES].

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. V.S. Rychkov, D1-D5 black hole microstate counting from supergravity, JHEP 01 (2006) 063 [hep-th/0512053] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, I. Messamah and D. Van den Bleeken, Quantizing N = 2 multicenter solutions, arXiv:0807.4556 [SPIRES].

  59. J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, I. Messamah and D. Van den Bleeken, A bound on the entropy of supergravity?, arXiv:0906.0011 [SPIRES].

  60. M. Guica, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger, The Kerr/CFT Correspondence, arXiv:0809.4266 [SPIRES].

  61. G. Compere and S. Detournay, Centrally extended symmetry algebra of asymptotically Goedel spacetimes, JHEP 03 (2007) 098 [hep-th/0701039] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. J. Raeymaekers, W. Van Herck, B. Vercnocke and T. Wyder, 5D fuzzball geometries and 4D polar states, JHEP 10 (2008) 039 [arXiv:0805.3506] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. D. Gaiotto, A. Strominger and X. Yin, New connections between 4D and 5D black holes, JHEP 02 (2006) 024 [hep-th/0503217] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. J.P. Gauntlett and S. Pakis, The geometry of D = 11 Killing spinors, JHEP 04 (2003) 039 [hep-th/0212008] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. E. Bergshoeff et al., N = 2 supergravity in five dimensions revisited, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 3015 [hep-th/0403045] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. S. Levi.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 0909.4081

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levi, T.S., Raeymaekers, J., Van den Bleeken, D. et al. Gödel space from wrapped M2-branes. J. High Energ. Phys. 2010, 82 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2010)082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2010)082

Keywords

Navigation