Skip to main content
Log in

Tools for Thoughtful Action: The Role of Ecosystem Approaches to Health in Enhancing Public Health

  • Canadian Milestone in Population and Public Health Research
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intimate interdependence of human health and the ecosystems in which we are embedded is now a commonplace observation. For much of the history of public health, this was not so obvious. After over a century of focus on diseases, their biologic causes and the correction of exposures (clean water and air) and facilitation of responses (immunizations and nutrition), public health discourse shifted to embrace the concept of determinants of health as extending to social, economic and environmental realms. This moved the discourse and science of public health into an unprecedented level of complexity just as public concern about the environment heightened. To address multifactorial, dynamic impacts on health, a new paradigm was needed which would overcome the separation of humans and ecosystems. Ecosystem approaches to health arose in the 1990s from a rich background of intellectual ferment as Canada wrestled with diverse problems ranging from Great Lakes contamination to zoonotic diseases. Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC) played a lead role in supporting an international community of scientists and scholars who advanced ecosystem approaches to health. These collective efforts have enabled a shift to a research paradigm that embraces transdisciplinarity, social justice, gender equity, multi-stakeholder participation and sustainability.

Résumé

Il est aujourd’hui courant d’observer l’interdépendance étroite entre la santé humaine et les écosystèmes où nous sommes enracinés. Pendant la plus grande partie de l’histoire de la santé publique, ce n’était pas si évident. Après plus d’un siècle d’attention aux maladies, à leurs causes biologiques, ainsi qu’aux moyens de corriger les risques auxquels nous étions exposés (en purifiant l’eau et l’air) et de faciliter les réponses appropriées (les vaccins, la nutrition), le discours de la santé publique a changé en adoptant le concept des déterminants de la santé, qui s’étendent aux domaines social, économique et environnemental. Ceci a amené le discours et la science de la santé publique à un niveau de complexité sans précédent au moment même où la préoccupation du public pour l’environnement augmentait. Pour aborder ces impacts multifactoriels et dynamiques sur la santé, il fallait un nouveau paradigme qui effacerait la séparation entre l’être humain et l’écosystème. Des approches écosystémiques de la santé sont nées du riche ferment intellectuel des années 1990, alors que le Canada était aux prises avec divers problèmes, de la contamination des Grands Lacs aux zoonoses. Le Centre de recherches pour le développement international (CRDI) du Canada a joué un rôle prépondérant en appuyant une communauté internationale de scientifiques et d’érudits qui ont fait avancer les approches écosystémiques de la santé. Ces efforts collectifs ont opéré un changement vers un paradigme de recherche qui englobe la transdisciplinarité, la justice sociale, l’équité entre les sexes, la participation de groupes à intérêts multiples et la durabilité.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Great Lakes Research Advisory Board. The Ecosystem Approach: Scope and Implications of an Ecosystem Approach to Transboundary Problems in the Great Lakes Basin. International Joint Commission, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hancock T. Health, human development and the community ecosystem: Three ecological models. Health Promot Int. 1993;8(1):41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resiliences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waltner-Toews D, Kay J. The evolution of an ecosystem approach: The diamond schematic and an adaptive methodology for ecosystem sustainability and health. Ecol So. 2005;10(1):38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rapport DJ, Costanza R, McMichael AJ. Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998;13(10):397–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rapport DJ. Is it all about us? Ecosyst Health. 2000;6:169–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forget G, Lebel J. An ecosystem approach to human health. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001;7(Suppl 2):S3–S38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health of Canadians. A working document. Minister of National Health and Welfare. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Waltner-Toews D, Kay J. An ecosystem approach to health. Leis. 2002;18(Suppl 1):15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Development Research Centre. Communities of Practice. Available at: http://www.idrc.ca (Accessed May 14, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilcox B, Aguirre A, Daszak P, Horwitz P, Martens P, Parkes M, et al. Eco-Health: A transdisciplinary imperative for a sustainable future. EcoHealth. 2004;1(1):3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waltner-Toews D. Food, global environmental change and health: EcoHealth to the rescue? McGill Med. 2009;12(1):85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lebel J. In Focus: Health–An Ecosystem Approach. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lebel J, Roulet M, Mergler D, Lucotte M, Larribe F. Fish diet and mercury exposure in a Riparian Amazonian population. Water Air Soil Poll. 1997;97(1–2):31–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pilgrim W, Eaton P, Trip L. The need for integrated linkages and long-term monitoring of mercury in Canada. Environ Monit Assess. 2001;67(1):57–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Charron D. Ecohealth Research in Practice: Experiences in Ecosystems Approaches to Health. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (in press).

  17. Spiegel J, Yassi A, Mas P, Tate R. Dengue in Cuba: Mobilization against Aedes aegypti. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:207–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spiegel J, Bonet M, Ibarra A, Pagliccia N, Ouellette V, Yassi A. Social and environmental determinants of Aedes aegypti infestation in Central Havana: Results of a case-control study nested in an integrated dengue surveillance program in Cuba. Trop Med Int Healt. 2007;12(4):503–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonet M, Spiegel J, Ibarra A, Kouri G, Pintre A, Yassi A. An integrated ecosystem approach for sustainable prevention and control of dengue in Central Havana. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2007;13(2):188–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Charron DF, Thomas MK, Waltner-Toews D, Aramini JJ, Edge T, Kent RA, et al. Vulnerability of waterborne diseases to climate change in Canada: A review. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2004;67(20):1667–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parkes MW. Ecohealth and Aboriginal Health: A Review of Common Ground. Evidence review prepared for National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. Prince George, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health (in press).

  22. Parkes MW, Morrison KE, Bunch MJ, Hallström LK, Neudoerffer RC, Venema HD, et al. Towards integrated governance for water, health and social-ecological systems: The Watershed Governance Prism. Global Environ Chan. 2010;20(4):693–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Veterinarians without Borders/Vétérinaires sans Frontières. One Health for One World: A Compendium of Case Studies. Veterinarians without Borders / Vétérinaires sans Frontières, 2010:1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chatman House. Meeting Report: Shifting from Emergency Response to Prevention of Pandemic Disease Threats at Source. Available at: http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk (Accessed April 30, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mertens F, Saint-Charles J, Mergler D, Passos CJ, Lucotte M. Network approach for analyzing and promoting equity in participatory ecohealth research. Eco Health. 2005;2:113–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jena C. Webb PhD.

Additional information

Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge collective funding support for the Canadian Community of Practice in Ecosystem Approaches to Health from Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC) with particular acknowledgement of the role that Dominique Charron and Andrés Sánchez have played in fostering the CoPEH-Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webb, J.C., Mergler, D., Parkes, M.W. et al. Tools for Thoughtful Action: The Role of Ecosystem Approaches to Health in Enhancing Public Health. Can J Public Health 101, 439–441 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403959

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403959

Key words

Mots clés

Navigation