Skip to main content
Log in

Basic iron sulfate — a potential killer in the processing of refractory gold concentrates by pressure oxidation

  • Special Gold Section
  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Refractory gold concentrates often contain submicroscopic gold that is encapsulated within the crystal matrix of iron sulfide minerals, such as pyrite, pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite. To recover the gold, the host mineral must generally be broken down chemically by oxidative processes, such as roasting, pressure oxidation or bacterial leaching, which expose the gold for subsequent recovery by leaching in cyanide solution. The focus of attention in these pretreatment processes is usually the oxidation of the sulfides to elemental sulfur, sulfur dioxide gas or sulfate ions. Less attention is paid to the deportment of iron and the changes in its oxidation state, although this can have a profound effect on gold and silver liberation, as well as downstream operating costs. Iron sulfide minerals break down completely during pressure oxidation, and dissolve in the sulfuric acid solution that is generated from oxidation of the sulfides. This dissolution liberates the tiny gold particles that were originally trapped in the sulfide crystals, and gold recovery during subsequent cyanidation is usually very high (>95%). Iron goes into solution in the oxidation process, initially as ferrous sulfate, but this compound is rapidly oxidized to ferric sulfate, which then hydrolyzes and reprecipitates. The form of the precipitate varies depending on the operating conditions in the autoclave and the presence of certain metal cations. When the acidity in the autoclave is quite low (<20 g/L H2SO4) and the temperature is high (>200°C), the formation of hematite is favored. When the acidity is high (>20 g/L H2SO4) and the temperature is relatively low (160 to 200°C), the formation of basic iron sulfate is favored. If the ore or the leach solution contains significant levels of certain cations (such as Na+, K+, NH4+, Ag+ or Pb2+) and the acidity is high (>20 g/L H2SO4), jarosite compounds are favored. Hematite is the desired iron product in the autoclave discharge, for both metallurgical and environmental reasons, but it is difficult to operate an autoclave under the conditions required for effective liberation of gold without converting some of the iron to basic iron sulfate and/or jarosite. These compounds fall into a category of iron compounds known generically as iron hydroxy sulfates, all of which can cause significant processing and environmental problems in the downstream gold process. This paper deals specifically with basic iron sulfate: the conditions under which it is formed in an autoclave, the problems that are caused by its presence in the feed to a cyanidation plant and possible remedial strategies that can be adopted, both in the autoclave and downstream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babcan, J., 1971, “Synthesis of jarosite, KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6,” Geol Zb., Vol 22, No. 2, pp. 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezowsky, R.M.G.S., and Weir, D.R., 1989, “Refractory gold: the role of pressure oxidation,” Proceedings of World Gold’ 89 Symposium, edited by Bhappu, R.B., and Harden, R.J., New York, American Institute of Mining Metallurgy and Petroleum Engineers, pp. 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M.H., and Gale, D.C., 1990, “Sulfur’s impact on the size of pressure oxidation autoclaves,” Journal of Metals, pp. 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, C.A., Brown, J.A., and Botha, M., 2010, “An economic and environmental case for re-processing gold tailings in South Africa,”Proceedings of the Canadian Mineral Processes Conference, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 365–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, J., King, J.A., Fleming, C.A., and Ferron, C.J., 2006, “Reduction of lime consumption when treating refractory gold ores or concentrates,” U.S. Patent Application No. 11/249,120, Publication No. 2006/0133974 A1, June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper number MMP-09-045.

Discussion of this peer-reviewed and approved paper is invited and must be submitted to the SME Publications Dept. prior to November 30, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleming, C.A. Basic iron sulfate — a potential killer in the processing of refractory gold concentrates by pressure oxidation. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 27, 81–88 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402383

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402383

Key words

Navigation