Skip to main content
Log in

Constraint Satisfaction Methods for Solving the Staff Transfer Problem

  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Staff Transfer Problem is concerned with the assignment of transfer postings to employees in large organizations. Staff transfers are an important issue in Human Resource Management in countries like India and China that have many large public sector undertakings. The Staff Transfer Problem can be viewed as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem, and methods such as Simulated Annealing, Genetic Algorithms, Satisfiability (GSAT), and Conflict Directed Backjumping can all be employed to solve randomly generated problem instances. Computer experiments indicate that Simulated Annealing is the best method of solution. GSAT with a tabu list yields solutions of good quality but is unable to solve large instances. Genetic Algorithms is also good, but it takes much more time than Simulated Annealing, Conflict Directed Backjumping, a deterministic search technique, is markedly inferior to the other methods. Thus for solving the Staff Transfer Problem, randomized approaches appear to be superior to deterministic ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Satisfiability Problem: A Constraint Satisfaction Approach, PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Calcutta, 2001.

  2. Acharyya S and Bagchi A, Staff Transfers in a Large Organization: A Constraint Satisfaction Approach, Proc KBCS-98, International Conference on Knowledge-Based Computer Systems, Mumbai, India, 1998, pp 51–63

  3. Beer M et al, Human Resource Management, A General Manager’s Perspective, Text & Cases, The Free Press, 1985

  4. Dessler G, Human Resource Management (17th Ed), Prentice Hall India, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fukunaga A S, Variable Selection Heuristics in Local Search for SAT, Proc AAAI-97, 1997, pp 275–280

  6. Computers & Intractibility: A Guide to the Theory of NP- Completeness, W H Freeman & Co, 1979.

  7. Goldberg D E, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, 1989

  8. Johnson D S, Aragon C R, McGeoch L A & Schevon C, Optimization by Simulated Annealing: An Experimental Evaluation, Part II, Graph Coloring and NumberPartitioning, Operations Research, Vol 39, 1991, pp 378–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kondrak G and van Beek P, A Theoretical Evaluation of Selected Backtracking Algorithms, Proc IJCAI-95, 1995, pp 541–547

  10. Simulated Annealing Algorithms for Continuous Global Optimization, in Handbook of Global Optimization II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, pp 179–230

  11. Mazure B, Sais L & Gregoire E, Tabu Search For SAT, Proc AAAI-97, 1997, pp 281–285

  12. Mitchell M, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press, 1996

  13. Papadimitriou C H & Steiglitz K, Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity, Prentice Hall, 1982

  14. Reeves C R, Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems, Orient Longman, 1993

  15. _Selman B, Levesque H J & Mitchell D G, A New Method for Solving Hard Satisfiability Problems, Proc AAAI-92, 1992, pp 440–446

  16. Selman B & Kautz H, Domain-Independent Extensions to GSAT: Solving Large Structured Satisfiability Problems, Proc IJCAI-93, 1993, pp 290–295

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acharyya, S., Bagchi, A. Constraint Satisfaction Methods for Solving the Staff Transfer Problem. OPSEARCH 42, 179–198 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398729

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398729

Keywords

Navigation