Skip to main content
Log in

Emergence of Complex Conditional Discriminations by Joint Control of Compound Samples

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to explore the emergence of verbal behavior resulting from the joint control of two antecedent stimuli that are presented together for the first time. Conditional discriminations were used for teaching and for probing. Four stimuli P1, P2, Q1, and Q2 were samples and four stimuli A1, A2, B1, and B2 were the comparisons in all discriminations of the study. We taught 4 conditional discriminations with 1 sample and 2 comparisons in each trial; overall, each sample controlled selections of 2 comparison stimuli (i.e., sample P1 controlled selections of A1 in 1 conditional discrimination and controlled selections of B1 in another conditional discrimination). In a probe with no reinforcement, 1 P and 1 Q stimuli formed a compound sample, and the 4 comparisons appeared in each trial. Only selections of 1 comparison have been reinforced in the presence of the 2 sample stimuli during teaching (i.e., only selections of A1 have been reinforced in the presence of P1, in 1 conditional discrimination, and in the presence of Q1, in the other conditional discrimination). We analyzed whether the 2 sample stimuli would jointly control comparison selections. In Study 1, 2 adult participants did not show the emergence of the discrimination with the compound samples. In Study 2, we modified the procedure of Study 1 in such a way that (a) a prompt procedure was used, (b) trials of the 4 single-sample conditional discriminations were gradually intermixed, and (c) the reinforcement was reduced. The 2 adult participants showed the emergence of the conditional discrimination with the compound samples. This study thus demonstrated the emergence of discriminations by joint control. These results have important consequences for the study of language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALONSO-ÁLVAREZ, B., & PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (2003, July). Joint control by two samples in conditional discriminations. Poster presented to the First Conference of the European Association of Behaviour Analysis, Parma, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & DE ROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DUBE, W. V. (1991). Computer software for stimulus control research with Macintosh computers. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOWENKRON, B. (1997). The role of joint control in the development of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 244–247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LOWENKRON, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LYNCH, D. C., & GREEN, G. (1991). Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of emergent stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 139–154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MACKAY, H., WILKINSON, K., ROSENQUIST, C., & FARRELL, C. (2003, July). Variables influencing stimulus class merger and intersection. Symposium conducted at the First Conference of the European Association of Behaviour Analysis, Parma, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (1994). Transfer of relational stimulus control in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 487–503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., HERSZLIKOWICZ, K., & WILLIAMS, G. (2004). Stimulus relations analysis and the emergence of novel intraverbals. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., & SERNA, R. W. (2003). Transfer of specific contextual functions to novel conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 395–408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A., SPRADLIN, J. E., & SAUNDERS, K. J. (2000). Learning-set outcome in second-order conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 50, 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SERNA, R. W., & PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L. A. (2003). An analysis of generalized contextual control of conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 383–393.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & CRESSON, O. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515–523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., CRESSON, O., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 261–273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: A relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375–396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Antonio Pérez-González.

Additional information

This research was conducted, in part, with a grant of the project BSO2002-00494 of the Spanish administration. We thank Gladys Williams, for reviewing previous versions of this manuscript, and the participants of the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alonso-Álvarez, B., Pérez-González, L.A. Emergence of Complex Conditional Discriminations by Joint Control of Compound Samples. Psychol Rec 56, 447–463 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395560

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395560

Navigation