Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing Rumors, Gossip, and Urban Legends Through Their Conversational Properties

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A conversational approach is developed to explain the ubiquitous presence of rumors, urban legends, and gossip as arising from their conversational properties rather than from side effects of cognitive processing or “effort after meaning.” It is suggested that the primary function of telling rumors, gossip, and urban legends is not to impart information to the listener or alleviate listener anxiety about the topic but to entertain or keep the listener’s attention, thereby enhancing social relationships. In this way, the traditional views of such stories are turned on their head, and an implication is that there is no essential feature of such stories just a range of conversational properties. The model also predicts hybrid forms that cannot be placed into one of the commonly named forms of talk. Some examples of these are given. The wider ramifications for changing “cognitive processing” effects into properties of social relationships are also drawn out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALLPORT, F. H., & LEPKIN, M. (1945). Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: Why some people believe them. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40, 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALLPORT, G. W., & POSTMAN, L. (1945). The basic psychology of rumor. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series II, 8, 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALLPORT, G. W., & POSTMAN, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARNO, A. (1980). Fijian gossip as adjudication: A communication model of informal social control. Journal of Anthropological Research, 36, 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARTLETT, F. C. (1932). Remembering. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BESNIER, N. (1994). The truth and other irrelevant aspects of Nukulaelae gossip. Pacific Studies, 17, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • BORDIA, P., & ROSNOW, R. L. (1998). Rumor rest stops on the information highway: Transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research, 25, 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRUNVAND, J. H. (Ed.). (1979). Readings in American folklore. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNVAND, J. H. (1984). The choking doberman and other ‘new’ urban legends. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • CANTRIL, H. (1940). The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAPMAN, S., & LUPTON, D. (1994). Freaks, moral tales & medical marvels: Health & medical stories on Australian television. Media Information Australia, 72, 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHESHIRE, J. (2000). The telling or the tale? Narratives and gender in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 234–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CORNWELL, D., & HOBBS, S. (1992). Rumour and legend: Irregular interactions between social psychology and folkloristics. Canadian Psychology, 33, 609–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COX, B. A. (1970). What is Hopi gossip about? Information management and Hopi factions. Man (N. S.), 5, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECLERQUE, J., TSUI, A. O., ABUL-ATA, M. F., & BARCELONA, D. (1986). Rumor, misinformation and oral contraceptive use in Egypt. Social Science Medicine, 23, 83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DEODHAR, N. S., YEMUL, V. L., & BANERJEE, K. (1998). Plague that never was: A review of the alleged plague outbreaks in India in 1994. Journal of Public Health Policy, 19, 184–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DIFONZO, N., BORDIA, P., & ROSNOW, R. L. (1994). Reining in rumors. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DONAVAN, D. T., MOWEN, J. O., & CHAKRABORTY, G. (2001). Urban legends: Diffusion processes and the exchange of resources. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FESTINGER, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FINE, G. A. (1986). Redemption rumor: Mercantile legends and corporate beneficence. Journal of American Folklore, 99, 208–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (2001a). Replacing catharsis and uncertainty reduction theories with descriptions of the historical and social context. Review of General Psychology, 5, 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (2001b). Individuals as social relationships: 18 ways that acting alone can be thought of as social behavior. Review of General Psychology, 5, 406–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (2003). Language use as social strategy: A review and an analytic framework for the social sciences, fiewew of General Psychology, 7, 251–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (2004). Handbook for analyzing the social strategies of everyday life. Reno, NY: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARRINGTON, C. L., & BEILBY, D. D. (1995). Where did you hear that? Technology and the social organization of gossip. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 607–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAVILAND, J. B. (1977). Gossip as competition in Zinacantan. Journal of Communication, 27(1), 186–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HERR, P. M., KARDES, F. R., & KIM, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IYER, E. S., & DEBEVEC, K. (1991). Origin of rumor and tone of message in rumor quelling strategies. Psychology & Marketing, 8, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KELLEY, H. H., & MICHELA, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LIENHARDT, P. A. (1975). The interpretation of rumour. In J. H. M. Beattie & R. G. Lienhardt (Eds.), Studies in social anthropology: Essays in memory of E. E. Evans-Pritchard by his former Oxford colleagues (pp. 105–131). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIYAZAKI, Y., & GUERIN, B. (2000). [Experiments in rumours and urban legends]. Unpublished raw data.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOSCOVICI, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEUBAUER, H-J. (1999). The rumour: A cultural history. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRASAD, J. (1935). The psychology of rumor: A study relating to the great Indian earthquake of 1934. British Journal of Psychology, 26, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRASAD, J. (1950). A comparative study of rumours and reports in earthquakes. British Journal of Psychology, 41, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSNOW, R. L. (1991). Inside rumor: A personal journal. American Psychologist, 46, 484–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROSNOW, R. L., & FINE, G. A. (1976). Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUTENBERG, N., & WATKINS, S. C. (1997). The buzz outside the clinics: Conversations and contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya. Studies in Family Planning, 28, 290–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCANLON, T. J. (1977). Post-disaster rumor chains: A case study. Mass Emergencies, 2, 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIBUTANI, T. (1966). Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • SINGH, J. (1990). Voice, exit, and negative word-of-mouth behaviors: An investigation across three service categories. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SINHA, D. (1952). Behaviour in a catastrophic situation: A psychological study of reports and rumours. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 200–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • TISHKOV, V. (1995). ‘Don’t kill me, I’m a Krygyz!’: An anthropological analysis of violence in the Osh ethnic conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 32, 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia

    Bernard Guerin & Yoshihiko Miyazaki

Authors
  1. Bernard Guerin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshihiko Miyazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Guerin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerin, B., Miyazaki, Y. Analyzing Rumors, Gossip, and Urban Legends Through Their Conversational Properties. Psychol Rec 56, 23–33 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395535

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395535

Search

Navigation