Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Units of Interaction, Evolution, and Replication: Organic and Behavioral Parallels

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organic and behavioral evolution both involve variation, selection, and replication with retention; but the individuals involved in these processes differ in the two kinds of evolution. In this paper, biological units of evolution, selection, and retention are compared with analogous units at the behavioral level. In organic evolution, natural selection operates on variations among organisms within a species, with the result of preserving in future generations of organisms those heritable characteristics that contributed to the organism’s survival and reproduction. Species evolve as characteristics of the population change as a result of past selection. Continuity in a lineage in the biosphere is maintained by replication of genes with retention of organismic characteristics across successive generations of organisms. In behavioral evolution, reinforcement operates on variations among responses within an operant, with the result of preserving in future responses those characteristics that resulted in reinforcement. Continuity in a behavioral lineage, within the repertoire of a given organism, appears to involve retention and replication, but the unit of retention and replication is unknown. We suggest that the locus of retention and replication is the nervous system of the behaving organism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, G. (1992). Models of proximate and ultimate causation in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1359–1370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior, and culture. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, W. M., & Heath, J. L. (1992). Behavioral explanations and intentional explanations in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1312–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J. (1992). Fitness: Theoretical contexts. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 115–119). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. N., & Burian, R. M. (1984). Genes, organisms, populations: Controversies over the units of selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1956). Adaptive behavior from random response. Behavioral Science, 1, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1973). The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 1, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1992). B. F. Skinner, organism. American Psychologist, 47, 1521–1530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, M. (1992). Radical behaviorism and scientific frameworks: From mechanistic to relational accounts. American Psychologist, 47, 1287–1299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1958). The origin of species. New York: New American Library. (Original work published 1859)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahoe, J. W., Burgos, J. E., & Palmer, D. C. (1993). A selectionist approach to reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 17–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1989). The interpretation of complex human behavior: Some reactions to Parallel Distributed Processing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 399–416.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A. (1992). Natural selection: Current usages. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 220–224). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, S. S. (1991). Contingencies and meta-contingencies: Relations between behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P. Lamal (Ed.), Behavior analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 39–73). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, S. S., Ellis, J., & Greenspoon, J. (1992). On the revolutionary nature of the operant as a unit of behavioral selection. American Psychologist, 47, 1329–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, S. S., & Field, D. P. (1994). Functions of the environment in behavioral evolution. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 241–259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1984). Units of evolution: A metaphysical essay. In R. N. Brandon & R. M. Burian (Eds.), Genes, organisms, populations: Controversies over the units of selection (pp. 142–160). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1989). The metaphysics of evolution. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1992). Fitness: Reproductive ambiguities. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 120–121). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattal, K. A. (1992). B. F. Skinner and psychology: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist, 47, 1269–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1988). Beyond behaviorism. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1994). Organisms, things done, and the fragmentation of psychology. Behavior and Philosophy, 22, 7–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1980). Prologue: Some thoughts on the history of the evolutionary synthesis. In E. Mayr & W. B. Provine (Eds.), The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology (pp. 1–48). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology: Observations of an evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechner, F. (1992). Behavior monographs: The revealed operant: A way to study the characteristics of individual occurrences of operant responses (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C., & Donahoe, J. W. (1992). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1344–1358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. (1992). Fitness: Historical perspectives. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 112–114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, J. D. (1993). Adaptation, teleology, and selection by consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 3–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, K. (1971). Operants. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 413–423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D. (1980). The meaning of the evolutionary synthesis. In E. Mayr & W. B. Provine (Eds.), The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology (pp. 388–398). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1972). Two types of conditioned reflex: A reply to Konorski and Miller. In Cumulative record (3rd ed., pp. 489–497). (Originally published in The Journal of General Psychology, 16, 272–279)

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1984). The evolution of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 217–221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1986). The evolution of verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 115–122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (1973). On the notion of cause, with applications to behaviorism. Behaviorism, 1, 25–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L., Xue, B. G., & Belluzzi, J. D. (1994). In vitro reinforcement of hippocampal bursting: A search for Skinner’s atom of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 155–168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. A., King, J. L., & Sanders, G. P. (1981). Biology: The science of life. Glenview, EL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The abridged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Behavior Analysis, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 13438, Denton, Texas, 76203, USA

    Sigrid S. Glenn & Gregory J. Madden

Authors
  1. Sigrid S. Glenn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory J. Madden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glenn, S.S., Madden, G.J. Units of Interaction, Evolution, and Replication: Organic and Behavioral Parallels. BEHAV ANALYST 18, 237–251 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392711

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392711

Key words

Search

Navigation