Skip to main content
Log in

In response

Compatibility of person-centered planning and applied behavior analysis

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to Osborne (1999), the aims and practices of person-centered planning (PCP) are compared to the basic principles of applied behavior analysis set forth by Baer, Wolf, and Risley (1968, 1987). The principal goal of PCP is social integration of people with disabilities; it qualifies as a socially important behavior, and its problems have been displayed sufficiently. However, social integration is a complex social problem whose solution requires access to system contingencies that influence lifestyles. Nearly all of the component goals of PCP proposed by O’Brien (1987b) have been reliably quantified, although concurrent measurement of outcomes such as friendship, autonomy, and respect presents a formidable challenge. Behavioral principles such as contingency and contextual control are operative within PCP, but problems in achieving reliable implementation appear to impede an experimental analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, S. R., Singleton, L. C, Tinsley, B. R., & Hymel, S. (1979). A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 15, 443–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. S. (1991). Marketing behavior analysis requires different talk. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 445–448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, W M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior, and culture. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, T. G. (1988). Supported employment: A community implementation guide. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, V. J. (1994). Evolution of a new service paradigm. In V. J. Bradley, J. W Ash-baugh, & B. C. Blaney (Eds.), Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities: A mandate for change at many levels (pp. 11–32). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, J., Hagner, H., Heikkinen, B., Far-is, S., DeMello, S., & McDonough, K. (1993). Whole life planning: A guide for organizers and facilitators. Boston: Training and Research Institute for People with Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, K. J., & Browder, D. M. (1998). Enhancing choice and participation for adults with severe disabilities in community-based instruction. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faw, G. W., Davis, P. K., & Peck, C. (1996). Increasing self-determination: Teaching people with mental retardation to evaluate residential options. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 173–188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Himadi, B. (1995). Discussion: Reflections from the clinical trenches. Behavioral Interventions, 10, 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, C. S., & Pfadt, A. (1998). Clinicians on person-centered planning teams: New roles, fidelity of planning, and outcome assessment. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 1, 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, C. S., & Vietze, P. (1998). Has person-centered planning become the alchemy of developmental disabilities? A response to O’Brien, O’Brien, and Mount. Mental Retardation, 36, 485–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, C. S., & Vietze, P. (1999). Acknowledging barriers in adopting person-centered planning. Mental Retardation, 37, 117–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, S. (1997). A renaissance in residential behavior analysis? A historical perspective and a better way to help people with challenging behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 20, 61–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, B. L. (1970). The first twenty years are the hardest. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnick, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior: From cure to prevention (Vol. 2, pp. 358–365). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H., Horner, R. H., & Newton, S. J. (1989). Social contacts of adults with severe disabilities living in the community: A descriptive analysis of relationship patterns. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 190–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H., Horner, R. H., Newton, S. J., & Kanda, E. (1990). Measuring activity patterns of adults with severe disabilities using the resident lifestyle inventory. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1993). Teaching children with autism to initiate to peers: Effects of a script-fading procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 121–132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, J. H. (1987). The future of JABA: A comment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 329–333.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, H. (1985). Cognitive counseling and persons with special needs: Adapting behavioral approaches to the social context. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, H. (1996). Learning to listen. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. G., Almeida, M. C., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Feldman, R. S. (1992). Promoting reciprocal interactions via peer incidental teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 117–126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, B. (1992). Person-centered planning: Finding directions for change. A sourcebook of values, ideals, and methods to encourage person-centered development. New York: Graphic Futures Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, B. (1994). Benefits and limitations of personal futures planning. In V. J. Bradley, J. W. Ashbaugh, & B. C. Blaney (Eds.), Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities: A mandate for change at many levels (pp. 97–108). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, B., & Zwernick, K. (1988). It’s never too early, it’s never too late: A booklet about personal futures planning (Publication No. 421-88-109). St. Paul, MN: Metropolitan Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirje, B. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In R. B. Kugal & W. Wolfensberger (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 179–195). Washington, DC: President’s Committee on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J. (1987a). Embracing ignorance, error, and fallibility: Competencies for leadership of effective services. In S. J. Taylor, D. Biklin, & J. Knoll (Eds.), Community integration for people with severe disabilities (pp. 85–108). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J. (1987b). A guide to life-style planning: Using the activities catalogue to integrate services and natural support systems. In G. T Bellamy & B. Wilcox (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to the activities catalogue: An alternative curriculum for youth and adults with severe disabilities (pp. 175–189). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J., & Lovett, H. (1992). Finding a way toward everyday lives: The contribution of person centered planning. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Office of Mental Retardation. (Available from the Research and Training Center on Community Living, Center on Human Policy, Syracuse University)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J., O’Brien, C. L., & Mount, B. (1997). Person-centered planning has arrived … or has it? Mental Retardation, 35, 480–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, G. (1999). Renaissance or killer mutation? A response to Holburn. The Behavior Analyst, 22, 47–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pearpoint, J., O’Brien, J., & Forest, M. (1993). PATH: A workbook for planning positive possible futures and planning alternative tomorrows with hope for schools, organizations, businesses, and families (2nd ed.). Toronto: Inclusion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. H., Everson, J. M., & Green, C. W (1999). A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 461–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reppucci, N. D., & Saunders, J. T. (1974). The social psychology of behavior modification: Problems of implementation in natural settings. American Psychologist, 29, 649–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Risley, T. (1996). Get a life! Positive behavioral intervention for challenging behavior through life arrangement and life coaching. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Community, school, family and social inclusion through positive behavioral support (pp. 425–437). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risley, T. (1999). Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis. In E. G. Carr, R. H. Horner, A. P. Turnbull, J. G. Marquis, D. Mag-ito McLaughlin, M. L. McAtee, C. E. Smith, K. A. Ryan, M. B. Ruef, A. Doolabh, & D. Braddock (Eds.), Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis (pp. xi–xiii). Washington DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L. (1996). Reconsidering the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life. In R. L. Schalock (Ed.), Quality of life: Vol. 1. Conceptualization and measurement (pp. 123–139). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. A., Jacobson, J. W, & Holburn, C. S. (2000). Defining and measuring person-centeredness. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I. S., Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smull, M. W, & Harrison, S. B. (1992). Supporting people with severe retardation in the community. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Retardation Program Directors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T., Felce, D., & Symons, F. J. (2000). Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, A., Strain, P. S., Hendrickson, J. M., & Shores, R. E. (1981). Using normative data for subject and target behavior selection. Behavior Modification, 5, 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandercook, T, York, J., & Forest, M. (1989). The McGill action planning system (MAPS): A strategy for building the vision. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsburg, R. T, & Rusch, F. R. (1979). Training severely handicapped students to cross partially controlled intersections. AAESPH Review, 4, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. A. (1999). Further comments on person-centered approaches. The Behavior Analyst, 22, 53–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wehman, P. (1981). Competitive employment: New horizons for severely disabled individuals. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Kelchner, K., & Richards, S. (1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior of individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632–642.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfensberger, W. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21, 234–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holburn, S. In response. BEHAV ANALYST 24, 271–281 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392038

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392038

Key words

Navigation