Skip to main content
Log in

Legitimität und Innovation

Einführung wertorientierten Managements in Deutschland

  • Wertorientiertes Management
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper combines institutional theory and research in innovation to analyze the factors that contributed to the legitimization of value-based management (VBM) in Germany. The results of our study indicate that successful and large firms have the legitimacy to be early adopters of VBM. Another important determinant of whether and when organizations adopt VBM is CEO change. Our findings highlight the value of combining the notion of legitimacy with innovation research in building a theory of institutional change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Abrahamson, Eric (1996), Management Fashion, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, S. 254–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadjian, Christina L./ Robinson, Patricia (2001), Safety in Numbers: Downsizing and the Deinstitutionalization of Permanent Employment in Japan, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, S. 622–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Paul. D. (1984), Event History Analysis.

  • Baptista, Rui (1999), The Diffusion of Process Innovations: A Selective Review, in: International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 6, S. 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Shawn L./ Wicks, Andrew C./ Kotha, Suresh/ Jones, Thomas M. (1999), Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, S. 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethel, Jennifer E./ Liebeskind, Julia (1993), The Effects of Ownership Structure on Corporate Restructuring, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, Summer Special Issue, S. 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikchandani, Sushil/ Hirshleifer, David/ Welch, Ivo (1992), A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, S. 992–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, Warren (1997), Strategic Change: The Influence of Managerial Characteristics and Organizational Growth, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, S. 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromwich, Michael/ Walker, Martin (1998), Residual Income Past and Future, in: Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, S. 391–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Humes, Christopher/Hall, William (2002), Former ABB Head Defends € 100m Payout, in: Financial Times, 19.2.2002, S. 17.

  • Bühner, Rolf/Tuschke, Anja (1999), Wertmanagement — Rechnen wie ein Unternehmer, in: Bühner, Rolf/Sulzbach, Klaus (Hrsg.), Wertorientierte Steuerungs- und Führungssysteme: Shareholder Value in der Praxis, S. 3–41.

  • Burns, Lawton R./ Wholey, Douglas R. (1993), Adaption and Abandonment of Matrix Management Programs: Effects of Organizational Characteristics and Interorganizational Networks, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, S. 106–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. (1987), Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, S. 1287–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, Robert M./ Smith, Abbie J. (2001), Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 32, S. 237–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciscel, David H./ Carroll, Thomas M. (1980), The Determinants of Executive Salaries: An Economic Survey, in: Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 62, S. 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comment, Robert/ Jarrell, Gregg (1995), Corporate Focus and Stock Returns, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 37, S. 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, Thomas E./Koller, Tim/Murrin, Jack (1994), Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Values of Companies, 2. Aufl.

  • D’Aunno, Thomas/ Succi, Melissa/ Alexander, Jeffrey A. (2000), The Role of Institutional Forces in Divergent Organizational Change, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, S. 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Stephen (1979), The Diffusion of Process Innovations.

  • Davis, Gerald F./ Diekmann, Kristina A./ Tinsley, Catherine H. (1994), The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 59, S. 547–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, David L. (1996), Does Isomorphism Legitimate, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, S. 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, Gregory G./ Beard, Donald W. (1984), Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, S. 52–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J./ Powell, Walter W. (1983), The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, Nr. 4, S. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, John/ Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1975), Organizational Legitimacy: Social Value and Organizational Behavior, in: Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 18, S. 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, Kimberly D./ Sutton, Robert I. (1992), Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy Through Illegitimate Actions: A Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, S. 699–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil (1991), The Structural Transformation of American Industry: An Institutional Account of the Causes of Diversification of the Largest Firms, 1919–1979, in: Powell, Walter W./DiMaggio, Paul J. (Hrsg.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, S. 311–336.

  • Greenwood, Royston/ Hinings, C. R. (1996), Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, S. 1022–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, Donald C./ Mason, Phyllis A. (1984), Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, S. 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T./ Freeman, John (1977), The Population Ecology of Organizations, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 82, S. 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh, Philippe C./ Noda, Tomo/ Boulos, Fares (2001), Managing for Value: It’s not just about the Numbers, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, Nr. 7, S. 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, Pamela R. (1993), Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, S. 564–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, Jürgen (1993), Innovationsmanagement.

  • Haveman, Heather A. (1993), Organizational Size and Change: Diversification in the Savings and Loan Industry after Deregulation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, S. 20–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höpner, Martin (2001), Corporate Governance in Transition: Ten Empirical Findings on Shareholder Value and Industrial Relations in Germany, MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/5, Köln, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Glenn/ Palia, Darius (1999), A Reexamination of the Conglomerate Merger Wave in the 1960s: An Internal Capital Markets View, in: The Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, S. 1131–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittner, Christopher D./ Larcker, David F. (2001), Assessing Empirical Research in Managerial Accounting: A Value-based Management Perspective, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 32, S. 349–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C. (1986), Agency Cost of Free Cash-flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 76, S. 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C./ Meckling, William H. (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 24, S. 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, Alfred (1996), Moden und Mythen des Organisierens, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, Nr. 1, S. 21–40.

  • Kieser, Alfred/Grunwald, Roman (2001), Shareholder Value — ein Managementmythos?, in: Thom, Norbert/Zaugg, Robert J. (Hrsg.), Excellence durch Personal- und Organisationskompetenz, S. 157–184.

  • Kimberly, John R./ Evanisko, Michael J. (1981), Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, S. 689–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, Matthew S./ Moore, James H. (2002), Executive Migration and Institutional Change, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, S. 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, Matthew S./ Zajac, Edward J. (1996), Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Cases and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, S. 812–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamertz, Kai/ Baum, Joel A. (1998), The Legitimacy of Organizational Downsizing in Canada: An Analysis of Explanatory Media Accounts, in: Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 15, S. 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Larry/ Stulz, René (1994), Tobin’s Q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, S. 1248–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Larry/ Stulz, René/ Walkling, Ralph A. (1991), A Test of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: The Case of Bidder Returns, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 29, S. 315–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, Ian C./ Hambrick, Donald C./ Day, Diana L. (1982), The Product Portfolio and Profitability — A PIMS-Based Analysis of Industrial-Product Businesses, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, S. 733–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin (1961), Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation, in: Econometrica, Vol. 29, S. 741–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G./Olsen, Johan P. (1976), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations.

  • Markoczy, Livia (1997), Measuring Beliefs: Accept no Substitutes, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, S. 1228–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W./ Rowan, Brian B. (1977), Institutional Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, S. 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, Randall/ Shleifer, Andrei/ Vishny, Robert W. (1988), Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, S. 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Kevin J. (1999), Executive Compensation, in: Ashenfelter, Orley/Card, David (Hrsg.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, S. 2485–2563.

  • O’Hanlon, John/ Peasnell, Ken (1998), Wall Street’s Contribution to Management Accounting: The Stern Stewart EVA Financial Management System, in: Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, S. 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, Charles A./ Main, Brian G./ Crystal, Graef S. (1988), CEO Compensation as Tournament and Social Comparison: A Tale of Two Theories, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, S. 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Christine (1992), The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 13, S. 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Donald A./ Jennings, Devereaux/ Zhou, Xueguang (1993), Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, S. 100–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellens, Bernhard/ Tomaszewski, Claude/ Weber, Nicolas (2000), Wertorientierte Unternehmensführung in Deutschland, in: Der Betrieb, 53. Jg., S. 1825–1833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey/Salancik, Gerald R. (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.

  • Picot, Arnold/Dietl, Helmut/Franck, Egon (1997), Organisation: Eine ökonomische Perspektive.

  • Pitman, Brian (2003), Leading for Value, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81, Nr. 4, S. 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Alfred (1986), Creating Shareholder Value. The New Standard for Business Performance.

  • Rappaport, Alfred (1999), New Thinking of How to Linking Executive Pay to Performance, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77, Nr. 2, S. 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rediker, Kenneth J./ Seth, Anju (1995), Boards of Directors and Substitution Effects of Alternative Governance Mechanisms, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, Nr. 2, S. 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelstein, Stefan (1997), Investment Decisions and Managerial Performance Evaluation, in: Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 2, S. 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovation, 3. Aufl.

  • Rogerson, William P. (1997), Intertemporal Cost Allocation and Managerial Investment Incentives: A Theory Explaining the Use of Economic Value Added as a Performance Measure, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, S. 770–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, Richard P. (1974), Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance.

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2. Aufl.

  • Schwalbach, Joachim (1999), Motivation, Kompensation und Performance, in: Bühler, Wolfgang/Siegert, Theo (Hrsg.), Unternehmenssteuerung und Anreizsysteme: Kongress-Dokumentation, 52. Deutscher Betriebswirtschafter-Tag 1998, S. 169–182.

  • Scott, Richard W. (1987), The Adolescence of Institutional Theory, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, S. 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, Peter D./ Lee, Kyungmook (2002), Institutional Change in Large Law Firms: A Resource Dependency and Institutional Perspective, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, S. 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, Theo (1991), Stellungnahme zum Thema „Shareholder Value als Zielgröße der Unternehmensführung“, in: Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 43. Jg., S. 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, Theo (1994), Marktwertorientierte Unternehmensführung, in: Bühner, Rolf (Hrsg.), Der Shareholder-Value-Report: Erfahrungen, Ergebnisse, Entwicklungen, S. 107–126.

  • Staw, Barry M./ Epstein, Lisa D. (2000), What Bandwagons Bring: Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation and CEO Pay, in: Admistrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, S. 523–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1968), Constructing Social Theories.

  • Suchman, Mark C. (1995), Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, S. 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, Steen/ Pedersen, Torben (2000), Ownership Structure and Economic Performance in the Largest European Companies, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, S. 689–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, Victor H./ Pahl, Bernd (1971), Relationship Between Age and Risk Taking Among Managers, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 55, S. 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach, Peter (1999), Institutionalistische Ansätze in der Organisationstheorie, in: Kieser, Alfred (Hrsg.), Organisationstheorien, 3. Aufl., S. 319–353.

  • Westphal, James D./ Gulati, Ranjay/ Shortell, Stephen M. (1997), Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, S. 366–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Stefan (2001), Aktienoptionspläne und Motivationseffekte, in: Eckardstein, Dudo v. (Hrsg.), Handbuch variable Vergütung für Führungskräfte, S. 85–105.

  • Witte, Eberhard (1973), Organisation für Innovationsentscheidungen — Das Promotoren-Modell.

  • Woidtke, Tracy (2002), Agents Watching Agents?: Evidence from Pension Fund Ownership and Firm Value, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 63, S. 99–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, Kazuo (1991), Event History Analysis.

  • Young, Gary J./ Charns, Martin P./ Shortell, Stephen M. (2001), Top Manager and Network Effects on the Adoption of Innovative Management Practices: A Study of TQM in a Public Hospital System, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, S. 935–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Monica A./ Zeitz, Gerald J. (2002), Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, S. 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Lynne G. (1983), Organizations as Institutions, in: Bacharach, S. B. (Hrsg.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, S. 1–47.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Bühner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bühner, R., Stiller, P. & Tuschke, A. Legitimität und Innovation. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 56, 715–736 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372756

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372756

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Navigation