Skip to main content
Log in

Quality Aspects of A356 Castings with Multiple Gates

  • Published:
International Journal of Metalcasting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work examines the quality aspects of multiple gated castings in aluminum A356 alloys. During the casting of parts in which multiple ingates are used to distribute the liquid melt throughout the mold, oxidation of the surface may prevent the adherence of the opposing fronts upon rejoining, thus producing sites prone to defect formation referred to as confluence welds. This phenomenon is investigated by the production of thin vertically sand-cast plates via the Electromagnetic Pump Green Sand (EPGS) process developed by the Foundation for the Research and Development in Transport and Energy (CIDAUT), Valladolid, Spain. For this research, three multiple-gated designs and one single-gated design were used to research an optimal configuration for melt delivery throughout the mold cavity. A series of numerical simulations were developed for each of the gating designs in order to compare modeling results with plates cast in the overseas counterpart’s foundry. Four-point bend testing was used to obtain information about the mechanical properties of the castings, and from this data, a Weibull statistical analysis was performed in order to quantify specimen failure rate for each of the configurations. Metallographic analysis was carried out using optical microscopy and fractography using a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM). The numerical and experimental studies provided interesting insights on the formation of defects associated with the confluence of flow fronts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell, J., Castings 2ndEditionThe New Metallurgy of Cast Metals. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barkhudarov, M., Hirt, C.W., Proc. Materials Solutions Conference on Aluminum Casting Technology, IL, USA (1998).

  3. Berry, J.T., Luck, R., “Porosity Criteria Functions Revisited,” 2006 World Foundry Congress, 4–7 June, Harrogate, UK

  4. Nyahumwa, C., Green, N.R., Campbell, J., “Effect of Mold-Filling Turbulence on Fatigue Properties of Cast Aluminum Alloys,” AFS Transactions, vol. 106, pp. 215–223 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cuesta, R., Martin, J., Maroto, J.A., “New Casting Process: The EPGS Process: The Science and Technology of Casting Production,” Foundry Trade Journal, pp. 66–70 (March 2008).

  6. Campbell, J., Castings Practice — The 10 Rules of Castings, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sessler, J.G., Aerospace Structural Metals Handbook, vol. 3, code 3105, rev. June 1969 (1991).

  8. Cuesta, R., Delgado, A., Maroto, J.A., Mozo, D., “Numerically Modeling Oxide Entrainment in the Filling of Castings: The Effect of the Webber Number,” Journal of Metals, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 62–65 (November 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials by Four-Point Bending,” ASTM International, 08.03, D6272-02, 513–518 (2008).

  10. “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature,” ASTM International, 15.01, C1161-02c, 217-226 (2008).

  11. Mi, J., Harding, R.A., Campbell, J., “Effects of the Entrained Surface Film on the Reliability of Castings,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2893–2902 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffiths, W.D. and Lai, N.W., “Double Oxide Film Defects in Cast Magnesium Alloy,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 190–196 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, D., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Chang, L., Wu, D., Fang, Z., and Shi, Y., “Effects of the Number of Testing Specimens and the Estimation Methods on the Weibull Parameters of Solid Catalysts,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 56, issue 24, pp. 7035–7044 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox, M., Wickings, M., Kuang, J.P., Harding, R.A., Campbell, J., “Effect of Top and Bottom Filling on Reliability of Investment Castings in Al, Fe, and Ni Based Alloys,” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 16, nos. 11–12, pp. 1445–1452 (Nov. 2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cox, M., Harding, R.A., Campbell, J., “Optimised Running System Design for Bottom Filled Aluminium Alloy 2L99 Investment Castings,” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 613–625 (May 2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sirrell, B., Campbell, J., “Mechanism of Filtration in Reduction of Casting Defects Due to Surface Turbulence during Mold Filling,” AFS Transactions, vol. 104, pp. 645–654 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell, J., “The Ten Casting Rules: Guidelines for the Reliable Production of Reliable Castings,” First International Conference on Gating, Filling and Feeding of Aluminum Castings (October 1999).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lett, R., Felicelli, S., Berry, J. et al. Quality Aspects of A356 Castings with Multiple Gates. Inter Metalcast 6, 67–82 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355528

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355528

Keywords

Navigation