Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The measurement of Instrumental ADL: Content validity and construct validity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new measure of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), which is able to discriminate among the large group of elderly who do not depend on help, was tested for content validity and construct validity. Most assessments of functional ability include Physical ADL (PADL) and Instrumental ADL (IADL). PADL-scales assess the basic capacity of persons to care for themselves. lADL-scales are used to assess somewhat higher levels of performance, such as the ability to perform household chores or go shopping. Data were collected from 734 70-year-old people in Denmark in the county of Copenhagen. The measure of Instrumental ADL included 30 activities in relation to tiredness and reduced speed. Construct validity was tested by the Rasch model for item analysis; internal validity was specifically addressed by assessing the homogeneity of items under different conditions. The Rasch item analysis of IADL showed that 14 items could be combined into two qualitatively different additive scales. The IADL-measure complies with demands for content validity, distinguishes between what the elderly actually do, and what they are capable of doing, and is a good discriminator among the group of elderly persons who do not depend on help. It is also possible to add the items in a valid way. However, to obtain valid IADL-scales, we omitted items that were highly relevant to especially elderly women, such as house-work items. We conclude that the criteria employed for this IADL-measure are somewhat contradictory. (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 5: 371-383, 1993)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fillenbaum G.G.: The well-being of the Elderly. Approaches to multidimensional assessment. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kane R.A., Kane R.L.: Assessing the Elderly. A practical guide to measurement. Lexington Books, Toronto, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feinstein A.R., Josephy B.R., Wells C.K.: Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann. Intern. Med. 105: 413–420, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fillenbaum G.G.: Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental Activities of Daily Living measure. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 33: 698–706, 1985.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spector W.D., Katz S., Murphy J.B., Fulton J.P.: The hierarchical relationship between Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. J. Chronic Dis. 40: 481–489, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Asberg K.H., Sonn U.: The cumulative structure of Personal and Instrumental ADL. A Study of Elderly People in a Health Service District. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 21: 171–177, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koyano W., Shibata H., Hakazato K., Haga H., Suyama Y., Matsuzaki T.: Prevalence of disability in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living among elderly Japanese. J. Gerontol. 43: S41–S45, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz S., Ford A.B., Moskowitz R.W., Jackson B.A., Jaffe M.W.: Studies of illness in the aged. J.A.M.A. 12: 914–919, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahoney F.I., Barthel D.W.: Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. M. State Med. J. 14: 61–65, 1965.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ware J.E., Brook R.H., Davies A.R., Lohr K.N.: Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. Am. J. Public Health 71: 620–625, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McDowell I., Newell C.: Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirshner B., Guyatt G.: A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J. Chronic Dis. 38: 27–36, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ware J.E. Jr.: Standards for validating health measures: Definition and content. J. Chronic Dis. 40: 473–480, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guyatt G.H., Deyo R.A., Charlsen M., Levine M.N., Mitchell A.: Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: A clarification. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 42: 403–408, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawton M.P., Moss M., Fulcomer M., Kleban M.H.: A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument. J. Gerontol. 37: 91–99, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fillenbaum G.G., Smyer M.A.: The development, validity and reliability of the OARS Multidimensional Functional Questionnaire. J. Gerontol. 36: 428–434, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hellevik O.: Forskningsmetode i sosiologi og statsvitenskap, ed. 3. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1984, pp. 108–140.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andrich D.: Rasch models for measurement. Sage University Paper. Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Series no. 07-001. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cronbach L.J.: Test validation. In: Thorndike R.L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement. American Council on Education, Washington D.C., 1971, pp. 443–507.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Foldspang A., Juul S., Olsen J., Sabroe S.: Epidemiologi. Sygdom og befolkning, ed. 2. Munksgård, Copenhagen, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Teresi J.A., Golden R.R., Gurland B.J., Wilder D.E., Bennet R.G.: Construct validity of indicator-scales developed from the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation Interview Schedule. J. Gerontol. 39: 147–157, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Avlund K., Schultz-Larsen K.: What do 70-year-old men and women do? And what are they able to do? From the Glostrup Survey in 1984. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 3: 39–49, 1991.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fillenbaum G.G.: Assessment of health and functional status: An international comparison. In: Kane R.L., Evans J.G., MacFayden D. (Eds.), Improving the health of older people. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990, pp. 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heikkinen E., Waters W.E., Brzezinski Z.J.: The elderly in eleven countries. A sociomedical survey. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waters W.E., Heikkinen E., Dontas A.S.: Health, lifestyles and services for the elderly. Public Health in Europe. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Avlund K., Kreiner S., Schultz-Larsen K.: Construct validation and the Rasch model: Functional ability of healthy elderly people. Scand J. Soc. Med. (In press).

  27. Schultz-Larsen K., Avlund K., Kreiner S.: Functional ability of community dwelling elderly. Criterion validity of a new measure of functional ability. J. Clin. Epidemiol 45: 1315–1326, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hambleton R.K., Rogers H.J.: Solving criterion-referenced measurement problems with item response models. Int. J. Educ. Res. 13: 145–160, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenbaum P.: Criterion-related construct validity. Psychometrika 54: 625–634, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lord F.: Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guttman L.: The basis of scalogram analysis. In: Stouffer S.A., Guttman L., Suchman E.A, Lazarsfield P.F., Star S.A., Clausen J.A. (Ed.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton University Press, New York, 1950, pp. 60–90.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cook L.L., Eignor D.R.: Using item response theory in test-score equating. Int. J. Educ. Res. 13: 161–173, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Williams M.E., Hadler N.M., Earp J.A.L.: Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J. Chronic Dis. 35: 115–122, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams M.E., Hornberger J.C.: A quantitative method of identifying older persons at risk for increasing Long Term Care Services. J. Chronic Dis. 9/10: 705–711, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lundgren-Lindquist B.: Functional capability in 79-year-old women and men. University of Gothenburg; The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Geriatric and Long-Term Care Medicine, Thesis, 1982.

  36. Hunt S.M., McKenna S.P., McEwen J., Williams J., Papp E.: The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc. Sci. Med. 15A: 221–229, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dawson D., Hendershot G., Fulton J.: Aging in the eighties. Functional limitations of individuals age 65 years and over. National Center for Health Statistics. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. No. 133. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 87-1250. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, MD, June 10. 1987, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Holstein B., Almind G., Due P., Holst E.: Ældres selvrapporterede helbred og lægemiddelforbrug. Ugeskr. Laeger 152: 286–391, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rosow I., Breslau N.: A Guttman health scale for the aged. J. Gerontol 21: 556–559, 1966.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lawton M.P., Brody E.M.: Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist 9: 179–186, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bergström G., Aniansson A., Bjelle A., Grimby G., Lundgren-Lindquist B., Svanborg A.: Functional consequences of joint impairment at age 79. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 17: 183–190, 1985.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hendriksen C., Lund E., Strømgård E.: Ældre menneskers funktionsformåen. En opgørelse fra “Rødovre-projektet”. Ugeskr. Laeger 149: 1835–1839, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Manton K.G.: The linkage of health status changes and disability. Comprehensive Gerontology A 1: 16–24, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lammi U.K., Kivelä S.K., Nissinen A., Pekkanen J., Punsar S.: Functional capacity and associated factors in elderly Finnish men. Scand. J. Soc. Med. 17: 67–75, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Manton K.G.: A longitudinal study of functional change and mortality in the United States. J. Gerontol. 54: 625–634, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jette A.M., Branch L.G.: The Framingham Disability Study: II. Physical disability among the aging. Am. J. Public Health 71: 1211–1216, 1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gossman-Hedström G., Aniansson A., Persson G.B.: ADL-reduction and need for technical aids among 70-year-olds. Comprehensive Gerontology B 2: 16–23, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jette A.M., Pinsky J.L., Branch L.G., Wolf P.A., Feinleib M.: The Framingham Disability Study: Physical disability among community-dwelling survivors of stroke. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 41: 719–726, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Manton K.G.: Epidemiological, demographic, and social correlates of disability among the elderly. Milbank Q. 67: 13–58, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Warren H.H.: Self-perception of independence among urban elderly. Am. J. Occ. Ther. 28: 329–336, 1974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wade D.T., Legh-Smith J., Hewer R.L.: Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int. Rehabil. Med. 7: 176–181, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kivelä S.K.: Measuring disability — do self-ratings and service provider ratings compare? J. Chronic Dis. 37: 115–123, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jette A.M., Deniston O.L.: Inter-observer reliability of a functional status assessment instrument. J. Chronic Dis. 31: 573–580, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pollard W.E., Bobbitt R.A., Bergner M., Martin D.P., Gilson B.S.: The Sickness Impact Profile: Reliability of a health status measure. Med. Care 14: 146–155, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Sheikh K., Smith D.S., Meade T.W., Goldenberg E., Brennan P.J., Kinsella G.: Repeatability and validity of a modified Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index in studies of chronic disability. Int. Rehab. Med. 1: 51–58, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Haworth R.K., Hollings E.M.: Are hospital assessments of daily living activities valid? Int. Rehab. Med. 1: 59–62, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Parkerson G.R., Gehlbach S.H., Wagner E.H., James S.A., Clapp N.E., Muhlbaier L.H.: The Duke-UNC Health Profile: An adult health status instrument for primary care. Med. Care 19: 806–828, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sonn U., Åsberg K.H.: Assessment of Activities of Daily Living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 23: 193–202, 1991.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Pfeffer R.I., Kurosaki T.T., Harrah C.H., Chance J.M., Filos S.: Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J. Gerontol. 37: 323–329, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Teresi J.A., Cross P.S., Golden R.R.: Some applications of latent trait analysis to the measurement of ADL. J. Gerontol. 44: S196–S204, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Fugl-Meyer A.R., Jääskö L.: Post-stroke hemiplegia and ADL-performance. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. (Suppl 7): 140-152, 1980.

  62. Rubenstein L.Z., Schairer C., Wieland G.D., Kane R.: Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: Effects of different data sources. J. Gerontol. 39: 686–691, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Magaziner J., Simonsick E.M., Kashner T.M., Hebel J.R.: Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 41: 1065–1074, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Lindmark B., Hamrin E.: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in two patient populations, three months and.one year after stroke. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 3: 161–169, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Andersen E.B.: Discrete statistical models with social science applications. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Gustafsson J-E.: Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch Model. Er. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 33: 205–233, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kreiner S.: Analysis of multidimensional contingency tables by exact conditional tests: Techniques and strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 14: 97–112, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kreiner S.: Rasch 1 & 2. Programs for item analysis. Technical Report. Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Kirsten Avlund & K. Schultz-Larsen

  2. The Glostrup Population Studies, Glostrup University Hospital,G, lostrup

    Kirsten Avlund & K. Schultz-Larsen

  3. Danish Institute of Educational Research, Copenhagen, Denmark

    S. Kreiner

Authors
  1. Kirsten Avlund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Schultz-Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Kreiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avlund, K., Schultz-Larsen, K. & Kreiner, S. The measurement of Instrumental ADL: Content validity and construct validity. Aging Clin Exp Res 5, 371–383 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324192

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324192

En]Keywords

Search

Navigation