Skip to main content
Log in

An Agent-Based Dynamic Model for Analysis of Distributed Space Exploration Architectures

  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A range of complex challenges, but also potentially unique rewards, underlie the development of exploration architectures that use a distributed, dynamic network of resources across the solar system. From a methodological perspective, the prime challenge is to systematically model the evolution (and quantify comparative performance) of such architectures, under uncertainty, to effectively direct further study of specialized trajectories, spacecraft technologies, concept of operations, and resource allocation. A process model for System-of-Systems Engineering is used to define time-varying performance measures for comparative architecture analysis and identification of distinguishing patterns among interoperating systems. Agent-based modeling serves as the means to create a discrete-time simulation that generates dynamics for the study of architecture evolution. A Solar System Mobility Network proof-of-concept problem is introduced representing a set of longer-term, distributed exploration architectures. Options within this set revolve around deployment of human and robotic exploration and infrastructure assets, their organization, interoperability, and evolution, i.e., a system-of-systems. Agent-based simulations quantify relative payoffs for a fully distributed architecture (which can be significant over the long term), the latency period before they are manifest, and the up-front investment (which can be substantial compared to alternatives). Verification and sensitivity results provide further insight on development paths and indicate that the framework and simulation modeling approach may be useful in architectural design of other space exploration mass, energy, and information exchange settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lo, M.W. and Ross, S.D. “The Lunar L1 Gateway: Portal to the Stars and Beyond,” presented as AIAA Paper No. 2001-4768 at the AIAA Space 2001 Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Aug. 28–30, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, J.N. “An Introduction to Systems Engineering,” Tutorial, Presented at the INCOSE Crossroads of American Chapter, Indianapolis, Indiana, Feb. 25, 2005.

  3. Saleh, J.H., Hastings, D.E., and Newman, D.J. “Flexibility in System Design and Implications for Aerospace Systems,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 53, Issue 12, December 2003, pp. 927–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornelius, C. and Doyle, R. “Architecture Design Strategies for the Evolutionary Development of Networked Human and Robotic Planetary Exploration Systems,” presented as AIAA Paper No. 2004-6517 at the 1st AIAA Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, Chicago, Illinois, Sept. 20–22, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mcmanus, H.L., Richards, M.G., Ross, A.M., and Hastings, D.E. “A Framework for Incorporating “itilies” in Tradespace Studies,” presented as AIAA Paper No. 2007-6100 at the AIAA Space 2007 Conference & Exposition, Long Beach, California, Sept. 18–20, 2007.

  6. Delaurentis, D.A. and Callaway, R.K. “A System-of-Systems Perspective for Public Policy Decision,” Review of Policy Research, Vol. 21, Issue 6, November 2004, pp. 829–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cureton, K.L. and Settles, F.S. “System-of-Systems Architecting: Educational Findings and Implications,” 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Waikoloa, Hawaii, Oct. 10–12, 2005, Vol. 3, pp. 2726–2731.

  8. Delaurentis, D.A. “Understanding Transportation as a System-of-Systems Design Problem,” presented as AIAA Paper No. 2005-123 at the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, Jan, 10–13, 2005.

  9. Sindiy, O. “A System-of-Systems Framework for Improved Decision Support in Space Exploration,” M.S. Thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, May 2007.

  10. Bonabeau, E. “Agent-based Modeling: Methods and Techniques for Simulating Human Systems,” Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the Unites States of America, Vol. 99, Suppl. 2, May 14, 2002, pp. 7280–7287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. “From Value to Architecture: The Exploration System-of-Systems,” Phase I Presentation, NASA Conceptual Exploration and Refinement Study, MIT and Draper Laboratory, Boston, Massachusetts, Mar. 2, 2005.

  12. Rader, S., Kearney, M., Mcvittie, T., and Smith, D. “Moving Towards a Common Ground and Flight Data Systems Architecture for NASA’s Exploration Missions,” presented as AIAA Paper No. 2006-5723 at the SpaceOps 2006 Conference, Rome, Italy, Jun. 19–23, 2006.

  13. Weisbin, C.R., Rodriguez, G., Elfes, A., and Smith, J.H. “Toward a Systematic Approach for Selection of NASA Technology Portfolios,” Systems Engineering, Vol. 7, Issue 4, Sept. 15, 2004, pp. 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross, A.M., Hastings, D.E., Warmkessel, J.M., and Diller, N.P. “Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 1, January–February 2004, pp. 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weigel, A.L. and Hastings, D.E. “Measuring the Value of Designing for Uncertain Future Downward Budget Instabilities,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2004, pp. 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walton, M.A. and Hastings, D.E. “Applications of Uncertainty Analysis Applied to Architecture Selection of Satellite,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2004, pp. 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. “MIT Space Logistics Project; Interplanetary Supply Chain Management and Logistics Architecture,” MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, URL: spacelogistics.mit.edu [Cited May 19, 2006].

  18. Lewe, J.-H., Delaurentis, D.A., Mavris, D.N., and Schrage, D.P. “Entity-Centric Abstraction and Modeling Framework for Transportation Architectures,” Journal of Air Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 3, Fall 2006, pp. 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sauer, C. “Preliminary Draft of User’s Guide to MIDAS,” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 1990-1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Crossley, W. “Genetic Algorithms,” Presentation and MATLAB program code, AAE 550—Multidisciplinary Design Optimization course, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, Fall 2006.

  21. Zhang, P., Peeta, S., and Friesz, T. “Dynamic Game Theoretic Model of Multi-Layer Infrastructure Networks,” Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2005, pp. 147–178.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Coppin, B. “Chapter 19: Intelligent Agents,” Artificial Intelligence Illuminated, Junes and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sindiy, O.V., DeLaurentis, D.A. & Stein, W.B. An Agent-Based Dynamic Model for Analysis of Distributed Space Exploration Architectures. J of Astronaut Sci 57, 579–606 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321518

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321518

Keywords

Navigation