Skip to main content
Log in

La transferabilidad de las evaluaciones económicas: concepto e instrumentos de medida

  • Artículo de Investigacón Original
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Spanish Research Articles

Resumen

Objetivos: Los estudios de evaluación económica de tecnologías sanitarias ofrecen información útil para la adopción de decisiones y cada vez se publican más artículos referidos a esta materia. Sin embargo, los estudios están referidos a un contexto determinado por lo que no es inmediato aprovechar los resultados sin antes efectuar algunas comprobaciones. Es decir, no es directa su transferencia a otros contextos.

Los objetivos de este artículo son mostrar la evolución que han tenido las diferentes formas de afrontar este problema y describir los métodos propuestos por diferentes autores respecto de la transferibilidad de los estudios de evaluación económica.

Método: Se definen los conceptos relacionados con la transferencia de resultados y, seguidamente, se revisan y resumen los métodos e índices propuestos por varios autores durante la última década; se presentan, además, algunos comentarios referidos a su aplicación práctica.

Resultados: Se muestran seis enfoques para abordar el asunto de la transferibilidad, algunos concretados en forma de índices numéricos que ponderan varios conceptos, y otros en forma de repaso de una serie de conceptos para los cuales la respuesta es dicotómica. El investigador ha de forjarse, a partir de ellos, un criterio general acerca de si acepta o no la transferencia de los resultados.

Conclusiones: Las decisiones de los agentes sanitarios tendrán que apoyarse en estudios de evaluación económica previos, en aras de la eficiencia del propio proceso de decisión. Para ello, la transferibilidad de los estudios es un elemento esencial. La elección del índice condicionará las decisiones futuras, por lo que los agentes sanitarios deberían conocer los instrumentos para medir la transferibilidad y sopesar sus ventajas e inconvenientes, así como el esfuerzo que significaría su aplicación.

Abstract

Objective: Economic evaluation studies provide some information that can be useful when taking decisions, and an increasing number of papers is currently been published on this matter. However, such studies are relevant for a specific context, and they cannot always be used in a different context with no checking. That is, transfer to other contexts is not straightforward.

This article aims to show how the various ways to deal with this problem have evolved, ant to describe the methods that have been offered by several authors to assess economic evaluation transferability.

Methods: Concepts related to results transfer are defined, and methods or indexes suggested by several authors in last decade are then reviewed and summarized. Some comments regarding its practical application are also reported.

Results: Six approaches to transferability are described. Some of them are based on numerical indexes that include several weighted concepts; some others review a list of concepts with a dichotomised assessment. Based on such assessments, researchers must establish a general criterion to accept or not that results are transferable.

Conclusions: Decisions taken by healthcare agents should be based on previous economic evaluations, to improve decision taking process efficiency. Transferability of studies is crucial for this. The selected index will determine future decisions. Thus, healthcare agents should know available tools to measure transferability and to weigh their advantages and disadvantages, as well as efforts needed to apply them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Referencias

  1. Gonzalez-Perez JG. Developing a scoring system to quality assess economic evaluations. Eur J Health Econ 2002;3(2):131–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Späth HM, Carrère MO, Fervers B, et al. Analysis of the eligibility of published economic evaluations for transfer to a giver health care system. Methodological approach and application to the French health care system. Health Policy 1999;49(3):161–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutten F. Economic evaluation and health care decision-making. Health Policy 1996;36(3):215–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sculpher MJ, Drummond MF. Analysis Sans Frontières: Can we ever make economic evaluations generalisable across jurisdictions? Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24(11):1087–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason JM, Mason AR. The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studies: issues and challenges ahead. Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24(10):937–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Birch S, Gafni A. Economics and the evaluation of health care programmes: generalisability of methods and implications for generalisability of results. Health Policy 2003;64(2):207–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee KKC. Are data arising from economic evaluation truly the solution to better decision making: a more global perspective. J Med Econ 2007;10(1):59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boulenger S, Nixon J, Drummond M, et al. Can economic evaluations be made more transferable? Eur J Health Econom 2005;6(4):334–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Antoñanzas F. Transferability of economic evaluation results. Pharmacoeconomics 2004:22(13):827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Welte R, Freenstra T, Jager H, et al. A decision chart for assessing and improving the transferability of economic evaluation results between countries. Pharmacoeconomics 2004;22(13):857–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiou CF, Hay JW, Wallace JF, et al. Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Med Care 2003;41(1):32–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Antoñanzas F, Rodríguez-Ibeas R, Juárez C, et al. Transferability indices for health economic evaluations: methods and applications. Health Econ 2009;18:629–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mason J. The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studies. PharmacoEconomics 1997;11(6):503–514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sculpher MJ, Pang FS, Manca A, et al. Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: A review and case studies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8(49):iii–117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heyland DK, Kernerman P, Gafni A, et al. Economic evaluations in the critical care literature: Do ther help us improve the efficiency of our unit? Crit Care Med 1996;24:1591–1598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Drummond MF, O’Brien, Stoddart LG, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programms. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nixon J, Rice S, Drummond M, et al. Guidelines for completing the EURONHEED transferability information checklists. Eur J Health Econ 2009;10:157–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Antoñanzas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antoñanzas, F., Ma Lorente, R. La transferabilidad de las evaluaciones económicas: concepto e instrumentos de medida. Pharmacoecon. Span. Res. Artic. 9, 3–12 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320869

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320869

Palabras clave

Key words

Navigation