Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Das Rätsel des prozeßorientierten Softwarequalitätsmanagement

  • WI — Aufsatz
  • Published:
Wirtschaftsinformatik

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Anderson, Christopher: A World Gone Soft: A Survey of the Software Industry. In: IEEE Engineering Management Review 24 (1996) 4, S. 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arthur, Lowell Jay: Improving Software Quality. An Insider’s Guide to TQM. Wiley, New York 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arthur, W. Brian: Increasing Returns and the New World of Business. In: Harvard Business Review 74 (1996) 4, S. 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bach, James: The Immaturity of the CMM. In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 9, S. 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bach, James: The challenge of good enough Software. In: American Programmer 8 (1995) 10, S. 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bellin, Georg: Softwarequalitätsmanagement gemäß ISO 9000 — Eine empirische Untersuchung zertifizierter Qualitätsmanagementsysteme anhand ausgewählter Aspekte. Diplomarbeit, Universität zu Köln, Köln 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beirne, Martin; Panteli, Androniki; Ramsay, Harvie: Going soft on quality?: Process management in the Scottish Software industry. In: Software Quality Journal 6 (1997) 3, S. 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bollinger, Terrry B.; McGowan, Clement: A Critical Look at Software Capability Evaluations. In: IEEE Software 8 (1991) 7, S. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coallier, Francois: How ISO 9001 fits into the Software world. In: IEEE Software 11 (1994) 1, S. 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coallier, Francois: TRILLIUM: A Model for the Assessment of Telecom Product Development & Support Capability. In: Software Process Newsletter 2 (1995) 1, S. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis, Bill: A Mature View of the CMM. In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 9, S. 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cusumano, Michael A.; Selby, Richard W.: Microsoft Secrets: How the world’s most powerful Software company creates technology, shapes markets, and manages people. The Free Press, New York 1995.

  13. DeMarco, Tom: The Role of Software Development Methodologies: Past, Present, and Future. In: 18th International Conference on Software Engineering. March 25–29, 1996, Berlin, Germany. Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA 1996, S. 2-4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DIN, EN, ISO (Hrsg.): Normen zum Qualitätsmanagement und zur Qualitätssicherung/ QM-Darlegung. Teil 1: Leitfaden zur Auswahl und Anwendung. DIN EN ISO 9000-1: 1994-08. Beuth, Berlin 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. DIN, EN, ISO (Hrsg.): Qualitätsmanagementsysteme. Modell zur Qualitätssicherung/ QM-Darlegung in Design/Entwicklung, Produktion, Montage und Wartung. DIN EN ISO 9001: 1994-08. Beuth, Berlin 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Department of Trade and Industry, British Standards Institute (Hrsg.): TicklT — making a better job of Software. Guide to Software Quality Management System Construction and Certification using EN 29001. Issue 2.0. DISC TickIT Office, London, England 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. El Emam, Khaled; Drouin, Jean- Normand; Melo, Walcélio: SPICE The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fox, Christopher; Frakes, William: Elements of the Quality Paradigm. In: Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) 6, S. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fox, Christopher; Frakes, William: The Quality Approach: Is It Delivering? In: Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) 6, S. 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerhardt, Tilmann: Strategie und Struktur in der deutschen Softwareindustrie. Eine industrieökonomische Untersuchung der Unternehmensentwicklung in der Softwarebranche. Verlag V. Florentz GmbH, München 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gibbs, W. Wayt: Trends in Computing. Software’s Chronic Crisis. In: Scientific American 43 (1994) 9, S. 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gilb, Tom: Level 6: Why we can’t get there from here. In: IEEE Software 13 (1996) 1, S. 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldenson, Dennis; Herbsleb, James D.: After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Technical report CMU/SEI-95-TR-009. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grady, Robert B.: Successful Software Process Improvement. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haynes, Philip; Meyn, Stephan: Is ISO 9000 going to put you out of Business? In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 2, S. 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hayes, Will; Zubrow, Dave: Moving on up: Data and Experience doing CMMBased Process Improvement. Technical Report. CMU/SEI-95-TR-008. ESC-TR-95–008. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Herbsleb, James et al.: Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results. Technical Report. CMU/SEI- 94-TR-13. ESC-TR-94-013. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herbsleb, James et al.: Software Quality and the Capability Maturity Model. In: Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) 6, S. 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Humphrey, Watts S.; Curtis, Bill: Comments on ‘A critical look’. In: IEEE Software 8 (1991) 7, S. 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Iansiti, Marco; MacCormack, Alan: Developing Products on Internet Time. In: Harvard Business Review 75 (1997) 5, S. 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ISO/IEC (Hrsg.): ISO/IEC PDTR 15504. Software Process Assessment — Part 1: Concepts and Introductory Guide (SPICE V2.0). International Organization for Standardization, Genf 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson, Jim: Creating Chaos. In: American Programmer 8 (1995) 7. S. 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jones, Capers: Patterns of Software Systems Failure and Success. International Thomson Computer Press, London, England 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kuvaja, P.; Bicego, A.: BOOTSTRAP — a European assessment methodology. In: Software Quality Journal 3 (1994) 3, S. 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kuhn, Thomas S.: Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Loken, Cecile B.; Skramstad, Torbjorn: ISO 9000 Certification — Experiences from Europe. In: American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) et al. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the First World Congress for Software Quality, June 202–22, 7995. ASQC, San Francisco, CA 1995, Session Y, S. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Matsubara, Tomoo: Does ISO 9000 really help improve Software Quality? In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 2, S. 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ould, Martyn A.: CMM and ISO 9001. In: Software Process — Improvement and Practice 2 (1996) 4, S. 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Paulk, Mark C. et al.: Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Technical Report. CMU/SEI-93-TR-024. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Paulk, Mark C.: How ISO 9001 compares with the CMM. In: IEEE Software 12 (1995) 1, S. 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paulk, Mark C. et al.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Perry, Tekla S.: In Search of The Future of Air Traffic Control. In: IEEE Spectrum 34 (1997) 8, S. 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Prokesch, Steven E.: Mastering Chaos at the High-Tech Frontier: An Interview with Silicon Graphic’s Ed McCracken. In: Harvard Business Review 71 (1993) 6, S. 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sanders, Joe; Curran, Eugene: Software Quality. A Framework for Success in Software Development and Support. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Spillner, Andreas: Kann eine Krise 25 Jahre dauern? In: Informatik-Spektrum 17 (1994) 1, S. 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  46. The Standish Group International, Inc.: Chaos. Standish Group, Dennis, MA 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stienen, Hans; Engelmann, Franz: Die BOOTSTRAP-Methode zur Bewertung und Verbesserung der Software-Entwicklung. In: WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 38 (1996) 6, S. 609–624.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stelzer, Dirk; Mellis, Werner; Herzwurm, Georg: Software Process Improvement via ISO 9000? Results of Two Surveys Among European Software Houses. In: Software Process — Improvement and Practice 2 (1996) 3, S. 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Taube, Frank: Stand der kontinuierlichen Verbesserung in der Softwareentwicklung. Eine empirische Untersuchung bei Softwareunternehmen in Deutschland mit nach ISO 9001 zertifiziertem Qualitätsmanagementsystem. Diplomarbeit. Universität zu Köln, Köln 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thaller, Georg Erwin: Qualitätsoptimierung in der Software-Entwicklung. Das Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Vieweg, Braunschweig 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thomsett, Rob: Project Pathology: A Study of Project Failures. In: American Programmer 8 (1995) 7, S. 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ungermann, C. et al.: Qualitätsmanagement bei der Software-Erstellung. Leitfaden für die Umsetzung der DIN EN ISO 9000ff. VUI-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wallmüller, Ernest: Ganzheitliches Qualitätsmanagement in der Informationsverarbeitung. Hanser, München 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yourdon, Ed: Good Enough Software. In: Guerrilla Programmer 2 (1995) 4, S. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systementwicklung, Universität zu Köln, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, D-50923, Köln, Deutschland

    Werner Mellis (Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik) &  Dirk Stelzer

Authors
  1. Werner Mellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Stelzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Mellis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mellis, W., Stelzer, D. Das Rätsel des prozeßorientierten Softwarequalitätsmanagement. Wirtschaftsinf 41, 31–39 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03250633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03250633

Search

Navigation