Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation and cytotoxicity comparison of type a gelatin nanoparticles with recombinant human gelatin nanoparticles

  • Communications
  • Published:
Macromolecular Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gelatin nanoparticles derived from bovine or porcine have been developed as various types of drug delivery system, and they need to be cross-linked to maintain their physicochemical properties in aqueous environments. Although gelatin is a widely used material in pharmaceutical industries, the safety issue of animal-origin gelatins, such as transmissible mad cow disease and anaphylaxis, remains to be solved. The purpose of this study was to prepare type A gelatin (GA) nanoparticles by modified, two-step, desolvation method and compare the toxicity of the resulting GA nanoparticles with recombinant human gelatin (rHG) nanoparticles. The GA nanoparticles were characterized, and drug loading and release pattern were measured. FITC-BSA, a model protein, was efficiently loaded in the nanoparticles and then released in a biphasic and sustained release pattern without an initial burst. In particular, the cell viability of the GA nanoparticles was less than that of the rHG nanoparticles. This finding suggests that rHG nanoparticles should be considered as an alternative to animal-origin gelatin nanoparticles in order to minimize the safety problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. K. Vasir, M. K. Reddy, and V. D. Labhasetwar,Curr. Nanosci.,1, 47 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. Park and Y. W. Cho,Macromol. Res.,15, 513 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Zwiorek, J. Kloeckner, E. Wagner, and C. Coester,J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.,7, 22 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. J. Marty, R. C. Oppenheim, and P. Speiser,Pharm. Acta Helv.,53, 17 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. A. Farrugia and M. J. Groves,J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,51, 643 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Azarmi, Y. Huang, H. Chen, S. McQuarrie, D. Abrams, W. Roa, W. H. Finlay, G. G. Miller, and R. Löbenberg,J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci.,9, 124 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Lee, J. K. Kim, S. R. Park, and Y. H. Chang,Macromol. Res.,15, 205 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. http://www.fibrogen.com/programs/fg-5009/.

  9. S. Young, M. Wong, Y. Tabata, and A. G. Mikos,J. Control. Release,109, 256 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. C. Liang, W. H. Chang, K. J. Lin, and H. W. Sung,J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,65A, 271 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. W. Sung, D. M. Huang, W. H. Chang, R. N. Huang, and J. C. Hsu,J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,46, 520 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. W. Won and Y. H. Kim,J. Control. Release,127, 154 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Weber, C. Coester, J. Kreuter, and K. Langer,Int. J. Pharm.,194, 91 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Dinauer, S. Balthasat, C. Weber, J. Kreuter, K. Langer, and H. von Briesen,Biomaterials,26, 5898 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. M. Jeon, T. H. Lim, S. H. Kim, J. G. Kim, and M. S. Gong,Macromol. Res.,15, 17 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. S. Brazel and N. A. Peppas,Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.,49, 47 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. K. Bajpai and J. Choubey,J. Appl. Polym. Sci.,101, 2320 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Tabata and Y. Ikada,Adv. Drug. Deliver. Rev.,31, 287 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Hee Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Won, YW., Kim, YH. Preparation and cytotoxicity comparison of type a gelatin nanoparticles with recombinant human gelatin nanoparticles. Macromol. Res. 17, 464–468 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218893

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218893

Keywords

Navigation