Skip to main content
Log in

Species recognition in agamosperms — The need for a pragmatic approach

  • Forum Species Concept In Agamic And Autogamic Complexes
  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that the taxonomie rank of species is now used for a very wide range of biological situations, from well-marked taxa that hybridize promiscuously to strict inbreeders, and that it should therefore be used equally in apomictic groups. Further, it is considered that the hierarchical variation found within such agamospecies should be designated by the usual ranks of subspecies, variety, etc., thus rendering the use of special terms for apomictic groups obsolete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong J.V. &Sell P.D. (1996): A revision of the British elms (Ulmus L.,Ulmaceae): the historical background.Bot J. Linn. Soc. 120: 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw M.E. (1963): Studies onAlchemilla filicaulis Bus., sensu lato, andA. minima Walters. Introduction and 1. Morphological variation inA. filicaulis, sensu lato.Watsonia 5: 304–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis P.H. &Heywood V.H. (1963):Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edees E.S. &Newton A. (1988):Brambles of the British Isles. The Ray Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackel E. (1882):Monographia Festucarum Europaearum. T. Fischer, Kassel & Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood V.H. (1963): The “species aggregate” in theory and practice.Regnum Veg. 27: 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrouille M.J. &Stace C.A. (1985): Pattern of variation of agamospermousLimonium (Plumbaginaceae) in the British Isles.Nordic J. Bot. 5: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrouille M.J. &Stace C.A. (1986): TheLimonium binervosum aggregate (Plumbaginaceae) in the British Isles.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 92: 177–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson T. (1976):Euphrasia in Sweden: hybridization, parallelism, and species concept.Bot. Not. 129: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • King L.M. (1993): Origins of genotypic variation in North American dandelions inferred from ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA restriction enzyme analysis.Evolution 47: 136–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leenhouts P.W. (1976): A conspectus of the genusAllophylus (Sapindaceae). The problem of the complex species.Blumea 15: 301–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markgraf-Dannenberg I. (1980):Festuca. In:Tutin T.G. et al. (eds.),Flora europaea 5, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marklund G. (1961): DerRanunculus auricomus-Komplex in Finnland I.Fl. Fenn. 3: 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville R. (1975):Ulmus L. In:Stace C.A. (ed.),Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles, Academic Press, London, pp. 292–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton A. (1980): Progress in BritishRubus studies.Watsonia 13: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards A.J. (1996): Genetic variability in obligate apomicts of the genusTaraxacum.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31:405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richens R.H. (1983):Elm. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell P.D., West C. &Tennant D.J. (1995): Eleven new British species ofHieracium L. sectionAlpina (Fries) F.N. Williams.Watsonia 20: 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C.A. (1975):Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C.A. (1989):Plant taxonomy and biosystematics. Ed. 2. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C.A. (1997):New flora of the British Isles. Ed. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C.A., Gornall R.J. &Shi Y. (1997): Cytological and molecular variation inHieracium sect.Alpina. Opera Bot. 132: 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Steenis C.G.G.J. (1957): Specific and infraspecific delimitation. In:Flora Malesiana, Ser. I, 5, Noordhoff, Djakarta, pp. clxvii-ccxxxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters S.M. (1993):Erophila. In:Tutin T.G. et al. (eds.),Flora europaea I, Ed. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber H.E. (1996): Former and modern taxonomie treatment of the apomicticRubus complex.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber H.E. (1998): Proposal concerning the names of apomictic species aggregates.Taxon 47: 495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo P.F. (1956): Hybridization between diploid and tetraploid species ofEuphrasia.Watsonia 6: 216–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo P.F. (1979): A taxonomie revision ofEuphrasia in Europe.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 223–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn K. H. (1921–1923):Compositae — Hieracium. In:Engler A. (ed.),Das Pflanzenreich IV. 280 (Hefte 75–79, 82), Engelmann, Berlin, pp. 1–1705.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stace, C.A. Species recognition in agamosperms — The need for a pragmatic approach. Folia Geobot 33, 319–326 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216207

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216207

Keywords

Navigation