Skip to main content
Log in

Age-specific reproductive behaviours in male roe deerCapreolus capreolus

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behaviour of active male roe deerCapreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758 was studied in a wild population on Storfosna island (Norway), during the pre-territorial and territorial seasons (February–August) of 1994. Observed behaviours were grouped in seven categories (mating, aggression, display, marking, vigilance, moving and maintenance), and the proportion of time spent in each behaviour by three age classes (yearlings, subadults and adults) was compared. Time spent in each behaviour varied significantly between months for all male age classes. From February to August, time spent in maintenance decreased, while time spent in vigilance increased. The time spent in mating increased both in adult and subadults but did not vary significantly for yearlings throughout the months. When comparing age classes within a month, there were no significant differences in time spent in each behaviour. Surprisingly, adult territorial males did not invest significantly more time in mating, with respect to yearlings and subadults. This may be consistent with the oligogynous mating system of roe deer, in which the reproductive success is divided amongst several years and their territoriality, which could be a tactic to reduce the competition for mating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behavior — sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R. and Linnell J. D. C. 1997. Variation in maternal investment in a small cervid; the effect of cohort, sex, litter size and time of birth in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) fawns. Oecologia 109: 74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio M., Festa-Bianchet M. and Mari F. 1989. Correlates of copulatory success in a fallow deer lek. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25: 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer R. T. 1981. Activity, movement, and distribution of Roosevelt elk during rut. Journal of Mammalogy 62: 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley P. T. 1991. Manifestations of social dominance in pronghorn bucks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 29: 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza J., Fernandez-Llario P. and Gomendio M. 1996. Correlates of territoriality in rutting red deer. Ethology 102: 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D., Gibson R. M. and Guinness F. E. 1979. The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Animal Behaviour 27: 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Guinness F. E. and Albon S. D. 1982. Red deer. Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: 1–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T.H. 1988. Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, London: 1–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Green D., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M. and Albon S. D. 1988. Passing the buck: resource defense, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 23: 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltman D. W., Festa-Bianchet M., Jorgenson J. T. and Strobeck C. T. 2002. Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 269: 165–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. 1978. The population ecology of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L. Cervidae) in central Europe. Spixiana 2: 5–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint A. P. F. and Krzywiński A. 1997. Sex differences in time budgeting in roe deer during the rut. Acta Theriologica 42: 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley M. P., Deutsc C. J. and Le Boeuf B. J. 1994. Size, dominance and copulatory success in male northern elephant seals,Mirounga angustrurostris. Animal Behaviour 48: 1249–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison A. J. M., Vincent J. P., Joachim J., Boisaubert B., Angibault J. M. and Cibien C. 1998. Modelling the effects of woodland fragmentation on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) distribution in agricultural landscapes. Gibier Faune Sauvage 1998: 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman M. V. 1979. Impala social behaviour: territory, hierarchy, mating, and the use of space. Advances in Ethology 21: 1–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson A. and Liberg O. 1996. Functional aspects of marking behaviour by male roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Journal of Mammalogy 77: 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komers P. E., Messier F. and Gates C. C. 1994. Plasticity of reproductive behaviour in wood bison bulls: when subadults are given a chance. Ethology Ecology Evolution 6: 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold W. 1978. On social organisation and behaviour of the gerenuk Litocranius walleri (Brooke 1878). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 47: 194–216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberg O., Johansson A., Andersen R. and Linnell J. D. C. 1998. Mating system, mating tactics and the function of male territoriality in roe deer. [In: The European roe deer: the biology of success. R. Andersen, P. Duncan and J. D. C. Linnell, eds]. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo: 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell J. D. C. and Andersen R. 1995. Site tenacity in roe deer: short-term effects of logging. Wildlife Society Bullettin 23: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell J. D. C. and Andersen R. 1998a. Territorial fidelity and tenure in roe deer bucks. Acta Theriologica 43: 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell J. D. C. and Andersen R. 1998b. Timing and synchrony of birth in a hider species, the roe deerCapreolus capreolus. Journal of Zoology, London 244: 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher C. R. and Byers J. A. 1987. Age-related changes in reproductive effort of male bison. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 21: 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher C. R. 1991. Activity budgets and mating system of male pronghorn antelope at Sheldon-National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada. Journal of Mammalogy 72: 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher C. R. 1994. Pronghorn male spatial organization — population differences in degree of non-territoriality. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 72: 455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miquelle D. G. 1990. Why don’t moose eat during the rut. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27: 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore N. P., Kelly P. F., Cahill J. P. and Hayden T. J. 1995. Mating strategies and mating success of fallow (Dama dama) bucks in a non-lekking population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N. 1993. Age, size, dominance and reproduction among male kudus: mating enhancement by attrition of rivals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32: 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pélabon C. and Komers P. E. 1997. Time-budget variations in relation to density-dependent social interactions in female and yearling male fallow deer during the rut. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75: 971–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pélabon P., Komers P. E., Birgersson B. and Ekvall K. 1999. Social interactions of yearling male fallow deer during rut. Ethology 105: 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff D. A. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Chapman and Hall, London: 1–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • San José C., Lovari S. and Ferrari N. 1996. Temporal evolution of vigilance in roe deer. Behavioural Processes 38: 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS for Windows 11.0 2000. SPSS Inc., USA.

  • Stearns S. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York: 1–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandgaard H. 1972. The roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) at Kalr and the factors regulating its size. Danish Review of Game Biology 7: 1–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner D. C. 1979. An analysis of time budgeting by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in an agricultural area. Behaviour 71: 246–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner D. C. 1980. A multi-variate analysis of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population activity. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 87: 991–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlström L. K. 1994. The significance of male-male aggression for yearling dispersion in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35: 409–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther F. R., Mungall E. C. and Grau G. A. 1983. Gazelles and their relatives — a study in territorial behaviour. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey: 1–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz N. G., Mysterud A., Langvatn R. and Stenseth N. C. 2002. Age-and density-dependent reproductive effort in male red deer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 269: 1523–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Associate Editor was Magdalena Niedzialkowska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melis, C., Hoem, S.A., Linnell, J.D.C. et al. Age-specific reproductive behaviours in male roe deerCapreolus capreolus . Acta Theriol 50, 445–452 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192638

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192638

Key words

Navigation