Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the efficiency of the Partially Solving Method (PSM) in comparison with the Gaussian elimination method

  • Published:
Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have proposed a new efficient solution method for linear systems called the Partially Solving Method (PSM), which essentially deals with a subsystem at each processing stage without complete knowledge of the entire system, resulting in significant reduction in necessary memory space and computation time.

In the present paper, we estimate the complexity of PSM and compare it with that of the prominent Gaussian elimination method. We derive an analytic expression of the total number of operations required to get a final solution of a system based on each of these schemes. Dependence of the total number of operations on the size and sparsity of a coefficient matrix of a linear system is examined. It is demonstrated that PSM is approximately twice as efficient as the Gaussian method when linear systems are sufficiently large and moderately sparse. We clarify the origin of these essential features of PSM by analyzing operations in different levels of procedures.

In addition, as a benchmark test we have confirmed the effectiveness of PSM by estimating numerically the complexity to solve linear systems with coefficient matrices given statistically. To our best knowledge, we are the first to quantitatively evaluate the complexity of the solving methods, including the Gaussian elimination method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. L.A. Pipes and S.A. Hovanessian, Matrix-Computer in Engineering. John Wiley, New York, NY, 1969.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Osano, K. Nakajima and M. Tanimoto, A new efficient solution method for a system of linear equations: Partially Solving Method (PSM). Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math. (JJIAM),13, No. 2 (1996), 243; Bulletin of the Electrotechnical Laboratory,60, No. 2 (1996), 93.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. D.J. Rose and R.A. Willaoughby, eds., Sparse Matrices and Their Applications. Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.P. Tewarson, Sparse Matrices. Academic Press, New York, NY, 1973.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Padilha and A. Morelato, A W-matrix methodology for solving sparse network equations on multiprocessor computers. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, PWRS.7, No. 3 (1992), 1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F.L. Alvarado, D.C. Yu, and R. Betancourt, Partitioned sparse A−1 methods. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, PWRS.5, No. 2 (1990), 452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.K. Enns, W.F. Tinney and F.L. Alvarado, Sparse matrix inverse factors. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, PWRS.5, No. 2, (1990), 466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Tanimoto, M., Yaoita, A., Nakajima, K. et al. Evaluation of the efficiency of the Partially Solving Method (PSM) in comparison with the Gaussian elimination method. Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math. 15, 443–459 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167321

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167321

Key words

Navigation