Skip to main content
Log in

Classes, colonialism, and acculturation

Essay on a system of inter-ethnic relations in mesoamerica

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sol, Tax, “The Municipios of the Midwestern Highlands of Guatemala,” American Anthropologist, Vol. 39, 1937; Henning, Siverts, “Social and Cultural Changes in a Tzeltal (Mayan) Municipio, Chiapas, Mexico,” Proceedings of the 32nd International Congress of Americanists, Copenhagen, 1956.

  2. See Georges Gurvitch,La Vocation Actuelle de la Sociologie, Paris, 1950, p. 301,passim.

  3. Nathan Whetten,Rural Mexico, Chicago, 1948.

  4. Alfonso Caso, “Definición del indio y lo indio,”América Indigena, Vol. VIII, No. 5, 1948.

  5. Sol Tax, Penny Capitalism, A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington, 1953.

  6. Loc. cit., Sol Tax,Penny Capitalism, A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington, 1953. p. 183.

  7. Eric Wolf, “The Indian in Mexican Society,”Alpha Kappa Delta, Vol. XXX, No. 1, 1960.

  8. Eric Wolf,“Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico,” American Anthropologist, Vol. 58, 1956.

  9. Robert Redfield and Sol Tax, “General Characteristics of Present Day Mesoamerican Indian Society,” inHeritage of Conquest, Glencoe: The Free Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alfonso Caso,“Los fines de la acción indigenista en México,” Revista Internacional del Trabajo, December, 1955, and Aguirre Beltrán, G., El proceso de aculturación, Mexico, UNAM, 1957, which still constitutes the most complete theoretical exposition on Mexican nativism.

  11. Charles Wagley,Santiago Chimaltenango, Guatemala, 1957.

  12. Sol Tax,Penny Capitalism,op. cit. A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington, 1953.

  13. Eric Wolf, “The Indian in Mexican Society,”loc. cit.

  14. Melvin Tumin,Caste in a Peasant Society, Princeton, 1952.

  15. A. D. Marroquín, “Consideraciones sobre el problema económico de la región tzeltal-tzotzil,” América Indigena, Vol. XVI, No. 3, 1956.

  16. R. Pozas, Chamula, un pueblo indio de los Altos de Chiapas, Mexico, 1959.

  17. M. Monteforte Toledo, Guatemala, monografia sociológica, Mexico, 1959.

  18. A. Y. Dessaint, “Effects of the Hacienda and Plantation Systems on Guatemala’s Indians,”América Indigena, Vol. XXII, No. 4, 1962.

  19. Dessaint,loc. cit.

  20. Melvin Tumin,op. cit. Melvin Tumin,Caste in a Peasant Society, Princeton, 1952.

  21. Cf. Manning Nash,Machine Age Maya: The Industrialization of a Guatemalan Community Glencoe, 1958.

  22. Cf. Goubaud’s remarks in the discussion of the report by Sol Tax, “Economy and Technology,” in S. Tax (ed.),Heritage of Conquest,op. cit., Glencoe: The Free Press, 1952. p. 74.

  23. Penny Capitalism,op. cit. A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington, 1953.

  24. Calixta Guiteras Holmes,Perils of the Soul, Glencoe, 1961.

  25. Ricardo Pozas,Chamula, un pueblo indio de los Altos de Chiapas, Mexico, 1959.

  26. Melvin Tumin,Caste in a Peasant Society,op. cit. Princeton, 1952.; John Gillin,San Luis Jilotepeque, Guatemala, 1958.

  27. Sol Tax,Penny Capitalism,op. cit. A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington 1953.

  28. Charles Wagley,Santiago Chimaltenango,op. cit., Guatemala, 1957, p. 67.

  29. Cf. Calixta Guiteras Holmes,Perils of the Soul, Glencoe, 1961.

  30. Op. cit. Cf. Calixta Guiteras Holmes,Perils of the Suol, Glencoe, 1961, p. 63.

  31. Sol Tax,Penny Capitalism,op. cit. A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington, 1953.

  32. Charles Wagley,op. cit.,Santiago Chimaltenango, Guatemala, 1957. p. 73,passim.

  33. “La situación agratia de las comunidades indigenas,” Acción Indigenista, No. 105, March, 1962.

  34. Robert Redfield, “Primitive Merchants of Guatemala,”The Quarterly Journal of Inter-American Relations, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1939.

  35. Sol Tax,Penny Capitalism,op. cit. A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington, 1953, p. 13.

  36. A. Marroquín,“Introducción al mercado indígena mexicano,” Ciencias Politicas y Sociales, No. 8, 1957.

  37. Robert Redfield,op. cit.

  38. Ricardo Pozas,Chamula,op. cit. un pueblo indio de los Altos de Chiapas, Mexico, 1959. p. 111.

  39. G. Aguirre Beltrán, Formas de gobierno indígena, Mexico, 1954.

  40. F. Cámara Barbachano, “Religious and Political Organization,” in S. Tax (ed.).Heritage of Conquest, Glencoe, 1952.

  41. G. Aguirre Beltrán,Formas de gobierno indígena,op. cit. Mexico, 1954.

  42. Ricardo Pozas,Chamula, un pueblo indio de los Altos de Chiapas,op. cit. Mexico, 1959.

  43. Ibid. Ricardo Pozas,Chamula, un pueblo indio de los Altos de Chiapas,op. cit. Mexico, 1959

  44. G. Aguirre Beltrán,Formas de gobierno indígena, p. 103.

  45. Ibid. G. Aguirre Beltrán,Formas de gobierno indígena, p. 103.

  46. Richard N. Adams,Encuesta sobre la cultura de los ladinos en Guatemala. Guatemala, EMEP, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Melvin Tumin,Caste in a Peasant Society,op. cit. Princeton, 1952.

  48. Sol Tax,Penny Capitalism,op. cit. A Guatemala Indian Economy, Washington, 1953.

  49. B. Colby and Van den Berghe. “Ethnic relations in Southeastern Mexico,”American Anthropologist, Vol. 53, No. 4, 1961.

  50. B. Colby and Van den Berghe,loc. cit.

  51. Robert Redfield, “The Relations Between Indians and Ladinos in Agua Escondida, Guatemala,”América Indigena, Vol. XVI, No. 4, 1956.

  52. Angel Palerm, “Notas sobre la clase media en México,” Ciencias Sociales (Washington), No. 14–15 and 16–17, 1952. (Reproduced inLas clases sociales en México, Mexico, s.f. (1960)

  53. On the concepts of relation of dependence and relation of order and their application to the study of class structures, see S. Ossowski,Class Structure in the Social Consciousness, London, 1963.

  54. Pablo González Casanova, in a different and independent analysis, also brings forth the existence of internal colonialism in Mexico. The present essay bears a particular case, which may be considered within González Casanova’s general approach See his study. “Internal Colonialism and National Development".Studies in Comparative International Development. Vol. 1. No. 4, 1965.

  55. Sol Tax, “La Visión del mundo y las relaciones sociales en Guatemala,”Cultura Indigena de Guatemala, Guatemala, EMEP, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  56. V. Goldkin, “Ethnic Relations in Southeastern Mexico: A Methodological Note,” American Anthropologist, Vol. 65, No. 2, 1963.

  57. We use the term “class situation” not in the sense given by Max Weber (Cf. H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills, eds.,From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology New York, Oxford University Press, 1946, p. 181), but in the sense that the individual who finds himself in such a situation participates with others in a kind of relations having the character of class relations.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See S. F. Nadel,The Theory of Social Structure, London, 1957, especially chapter IV.

  59. Cf. Pablo González Casanova, “Sociedad plural y desarrollo: el caso de México,” Améria Latína, Year 5, No. 4, 1962.

  60. Jaime Díaz Rozzotto,El carácter de la revolución guatemalteca, Mexico, 1958. Also see Richard N. Adams, “Social Change in Guatemala and U.S. Policy,” inSocial Change in Latin America Today, New York, 1960.

  61. Cf. Rodolfo Stavenhagen, “La réforme agraire et les classes sociales rurales au Mexique,” Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, 34 1963.

  62. Cf. Eric Wolf,Sons of the Shaking Earth, Chicago, 1959.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stavenhagen, R. Classes, colonialism, and acculturation. St Comp Int Dev 1, 53–77 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041077

Keywords

Navigation