Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Soil Plowing and Fertilization on the Susceptibility of Four Olive Cultivars to the InsectBactrocera oleae and the FungiSphaeropsis dalmatica andSpilocaea oleagina

  • Phytopathology
  • Note
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Susceptibility to the insectBactrocera oleae and the fungiSpilocaea oleagina andSphaeropsis dalmatica was investigated in four olive cultivars, two for table fruit production (Kalamon and Chondrolia Chalkidikis) and two for oil production (Lianolia and Koroneiki). Cv. Chondrolia Chalkidikis was the most susceptible to all three pathogens, followed by cv. Kalamon. Soil plowing and the organic fertilizer Bio-Trust® (10-3-6+8% MgCO3+10% CaCO8) increased the susceptibility of all four tested olive cultivars to the insect and the two fungi. Correlations were found between the attacks byB. oleae and infections byS. oleagina andS. dalmatica on the four olive cultivars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed, S.A. and El-Bassiouny, M.N. (2002) Spatial distribution of olive fruit flyBactrocera (Dacus) oleae (Gmelin) on olive varieties in North Sinai.Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor 40:541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anon. (1986) Hojiblanca. Gordal Sevillana.Olivae 3:34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anon. (1999) Bouteillan.Arboric. Fruit. 533:71.

  4. Boco, M., Pilli, M. and Tombesi, A. (2002) First evaluation of pruning intensities and intervals in olive.Riv. Fruttic Ortofloric. 64:71–75 (Italian, with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dimou, I., Koutsikopoulos, C., Economopoulos, A.P. and Lykakis, J. (2003) Depth of putation of the wild olive fruit fly,Bactrocera (Dacus) oleae (Gmel.) (Dipt. Tephritidae), as affected by soil abiotic factors.J. Appl. Entomol. 127:12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Bassiouny, M.N., Negm, F.H. and Salem, M.M. (1996) Susceptibility of the olive varieties for the infestation byDacus oleae (G) as related to their physical and chemical properties.Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor 34:1935–1942.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greca, L. and Vrenna, G. (1995) Damage bySphaeropsis dalmatica in Calabria.Inf. Fitopatol. 45:32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gümusay, B., Özilbey, U., Ertem, G. and Oktar, A. (1990) Studies on the susceptibility of some important table and oil olive cultivars of the Aegean region to olive fly (Dacus oleae Gmel.) in Turkey.Acta Hortic. 286:359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iannotta, N. (1999) Susceptibility of diverse olive cultivars to olive fly and peacock spot.Inf. Agrario 55: 48, 69–73 (Italian; English summary in CAB Abstracts Database #20001608820).

    Google Scholar 

  10. López-Doncel, L.M., Trapero, A. and Garcia-Berenguer, A. (1999) Resistance of olive tree cultivars to leaf spot caused bySpilocaea oleagina.Acta Hortic. 474:549–554.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michelakis, S. (1990) The influence of pests and diseases on the quantity and quality of olive oil production.Olive 67:38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Proietti, P. and Famiani, F. (2005) Cultural choices and olive health.Inf. Fitopatol. 55:4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zachos, D.G. and Tzavella-Klonari, K. (1979) Research on the identity and systematic position of the fingus causing the olive disease attributed toMacrophoma orSphaeropsis dalmatica.Ann. Inst. Phytopathol. Benaki 12:59–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Thomidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Navrozidis, E., Zartaloudis, Z., Thomidis, T. et al. Effect of Soil Plowing and Fertilization on the Susceptibility of Four Olive Cultivars to the InsectBactrocera oleae and the FungiSphaeropsis dalmatica andSpilocaea oleagina . Phytoparasitica 35, 429–432 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020599

Key words

Navigation