Skip to main content
Log in

Fate and exposure models in relation to risk assessment

Developments and validation criteria

  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recognition of potential long-term effects of substances, has led to the development of regulations and legislation which emphasis the need for assessing the risks posed by both new and existing substances for man and the environment. The evaluation of fate and exposure models is put into perspective in relation to the developments over the last five years in the framework of the EU regulations and national legislation within the European Community. The validation of environmental exposure models (multi-media models) is described in the context of quality assurance of models available to a user group, which is different from the quality assurance aspects for a developers group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Technical Guidance Documents in Support of The Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Substances (1993)

  2. The Commission Regulation EC No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances (1994)

  3. ECETOC Technical Report No 51: Environmental Hazard Assessment of Substances (1993)

  4. ECETOC Technical Report No 61: Environmental Exposure Assessment (September 1994)

  5. ECETOC Special Report No 8: Hazchem, A Mathematical Model for Use in Risk Assessment of Substances (October 1994)

  6. ECETOC Technical Report No 68: Assessment Factors in Human Health Risk Assessment (August 1995)

  7. D.T. Jager andC.J.M. Visser: Uniform System for the Evaluation of Substances (USES). Version 1.0 RIVM VROM WVC Distribution no 11144/150 (January 1994)

  8. Circular: Dutch Intervention Values Soil Remediation. Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and Environmental Conservation DG Environmental Conservation (1994)

  9. ECETOC Technical Report No 40: Hazard Assessment of Chemical Contaminants in Soil (1990), (Describing HESP (Human Exposure to Soil Pollutants) updated in January 1995)

  10. ASTM Designation: ES 38–94, Emergency Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Sites (July 1994)

  11. C.J. van Leeuwen andJ.L.M. Hermens: Risk Assessment of Chemicals, An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Press (1995)

  12. ECETOC Technical Report No 50: Estimating Environmental Concentrations of Chemicals Using Fate and Transport Models (November 1992)

  13. C.E. Cowan;D. Mackay;T.C.J. Feijtel;D. van de Meent;A. Di Guardo;J. Davies andN. Mackay: The Multi-Media Fate Model — A vital tool for predicting the fate of chemicals. SETAC Press Pensacola (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Mackay;S. Paterson andW.Y. Shiu: Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals. Chemosphere 24, 659 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Mackay: Multimedia Environmental Fate Models. The fugacity approach (1991)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veerkamp, W., Wolff, C. Fate and exposure models in relation to risk assessment. Environ. Sci. & Pollut. Res. 3, 91–95 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985497

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985497

Key words

Navigation