Skip to main content
Log in

The use of multicriteria decision aid system in the information technology (It) allocation problem

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision Makers (DM) should know how to allocate information technology in their organizations. Multicriteria methods can be used to analyze decisions dealing with this problem. This paper provides the use of systemic approach to reduce the level of uncertainty prevalent in this type of decisions; thus, we use multicriteria aid decision making to solve this complex problem. Using also mathematical programming (0,1), having as input those conditions resulting from the multicriteria results, it is possible to allocate easier the different strategic, tactic and operational Information Systems into organization’s IT structure. We will utilize as case study the needs in IT by several Research and Development teams working within the framework of a University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bana e Costa, CA., Vansnick, J.C, (1997). “Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model”,Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6 (2), 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C., (1999). “The MACBETH approach: Basic ideas, software and an application”, In: Maskens, N., Roubens, M. (Eds.), Advances in Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, S.A. (1995).“Why some R&D Organizations are More Productive than Others ”. Research Technology Management, January-February.

  • Brans J.P. and B. Mareschal (1994). “The Promcalc and Gaia Decision-Support System for Multicriteria Decision Aid. Decision Support Systems, 12 (4-5): 297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans J.P. B. Mareschal et al (1984). “PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis”. In J. P. Brans, editor, Operational Research ’84; 477–490

  • Brans Jean-Pierre and Bertrand Marechal (2002). “PROMÉTHÉE-GAIA Une méthodologie d’aide à la decision en presence de critères multiples”. Editions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles.

  • Brans, J.P and B. Mareschal, (1992). “The PROMÉTHÉE—V MCDM problems with segmentation constraints”. INFORMS, 30(2): 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, T.C., Esparza, F.E., Puente, L., Uquillas, D. (1990). “Modelos para la Jerarquización y selectión óptima de proyectos de investigatión y desarrollo Tecnológico”. Ciencia Ed. (IMIQ), 5 (1). 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D. (1992), “The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance”,Harvard Business Review, January-February, 71–9.

  • Lewis, I. and Talalayevsky, A. (2000), “Third party logistics: leveraging information technology”,Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 20 No. 2, 173–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharis, C., J.P. Brans et al (1998). The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure (a PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support. Journal of Decision Systems, 7: 283–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putrus, R. (1990). “Accounting for intangibles in integrated manufacturing’”,Information Strategy: the Executive’s Journal, Vol. 4, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. 1985.Méthodologie Multicritère d’aide à la Décision. Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and D. Bouyssou (1993) “Aide Multicritère à la decisión Méthodes et cas” Economica. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. P. 1973. “La Méthode ELECTRE II, Une Application Au Média-Planning”. M. Ross (edit). North Holland, 291–302.

  • Ryan, S.D. and Harrison, D.A. (2000), “Considering social subsystem costs and benefits in information technology investment decisions: a view from the field on anticipated payoffs”.Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 31 No. 4, 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. y L.G. Vargas. 1994.Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Vol. VII. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. y L.G. Vargas. 1994.Fundamentals of Decision Making and priority Theory with the Ananlytical Hierarchy Process.Vol. VI. RWS Publications Pittsbburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. and Sundarraj, R.J. (2001), “A decision model for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies’“.Information Systems Management, Vol. 3, pp. 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärlig Alain (1990), Décider sur pluiseurs critères Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes. Laussane

  • Schniederjans, Marc J and Janie L. Hamaker (2003) “A new Strategic Information Technology Investment Model”.Management Decision (41/1); 8–17.

  • Talluri, S. (2000), “An IT/IS acquisition and justification model for supply-chain management”,International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistic Management, Vol. 30 Nos. 3-4,. 221–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke Philippe.(1989), L’aide Multicritère à la Décision. Editions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles.

  • Ward, J.M. (1990), “A portfolio approach to evaluating information systems investments and setting priorities’“.Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 5, 222–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. Escobar-Toledo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Escobar-Toledo, C.E., López-García, B. The use of multicriteria decision aid system in the information technology (It) allocation problem. Oper Res Int J 5, 223–240 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944310

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944310

Keywords

Navigation